Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-xg4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-03T04:05:01.041Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Long-Term Trends and Short-Term Forecasts: The Transformation of US Presidential Elections in an Age of Polarization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2014

Alan I. Abramowitz*
Emory University


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Symposium: US Presidential Election Forecasting
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Abramowitz, Alan I. 2012. “Forecasting in a Polarized Era: The Time for Change Model and the 2012 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 45 (4):. 1819.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2013. The Polarized Public: Why American GovernmentIis So Dysfunctional. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 1998. “ Ideological Realignment in the US Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60 (3): 634–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bafumi, Joseph and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” Journal of Politics, 71 (1): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “ Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science, 44 (1): 3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Michael J., and Bickers, Kenneth N.. 2012. “Forecasting the 2012 Presidential Election with State-Level Economic Indicators.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 45 (4): 669–74.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2012. “Forecasting the Presidential and Congressional Elections of 2012: The Trial-Heat and the Seats-in-Trouble Models.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 45 (4): 630–.34.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2012. “The Objective and Subjective Economy and the Presidential VotePS: Political Science and Politics, 45 (4): 620–24.Google Scholar
Highton, Benjamin, and Kam, Cindy D.. 2011. “The Long-Term Dynamics of Partisanship and Issue Orientations.” Journal of Politics, 73 (1): 202–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 2012. “Incumbency, National Conditions, and the 2012 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 45 (4): 640–43.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2012. “The Electoral Origins of Polarized Politics: Evidence from the 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study,” American Behavioral Scientist, 56 (12): 1612–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Tien, Charles. 2012. “Election Forecasting for Turbulent Times.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 45 (4): 625–29.Google Scholar
Lockerbie, Brad. 2012. “Economic Expectations and Election Outcomes: The Presidency and the House in 2012.? PS: Political Science and Politics, 45 (4): 644–47.Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut and Bednarczuk, Michael. 2012. “History and Primary: The Obama Reelection.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 45 (4): 614–17.Google Scholar