Hostname: page-component-546b4f848f-lx7sf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-01T03:10:58.124Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Navigating “Insider” and “Outsider” Status as Researchers Conducting Field Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2022

Eunji Kim
Vanderbilt University, USA
Sumitra Badrinathan
University of Oxford, UK
Donghyun Danny Choi
University of Pittsburgh, USA
Sabrina Karim
Cornell University, USA
Yang-Yang Zhou
University of British Columbia, Canada


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Field Experiments: Thinking Through Identity and Positionality
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Arriola, Leonardo R., Choi, Donghyun Danny, Davis, Justine M., Phillips, Melanie L., and Rakner, Lise. 2021. “Paying to Party: Candidate Resources and Party Switching in New Democracies.” Party Politics. Scholar
Badrinathan, Sumitra. 2021. “Educative Interventions to Combat Misinformation: Evidence from a Field Experiment in India.” American Political Science Review 115 (4): 1325–41. DOI:10.1017/S0003055421000459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouka, Yolande. 2015. “Researching Violence in Africa as a Black Woman: Notes from Rwanda.” Washington, DC: American University, Institute for Security Studies. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Choi, Dong-Hyun. 2018. “Severed Connections: Political Parties and Democratic Responsiveness in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Berkeley: University of California. PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
Choi, Donghyun Danny, Poertner, Mathias, and Sambanis, Nicholas. 2019. “Parochialism, Social Norms, and Discrimination Against Immigrants.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (33): 16274–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coffey, Amanda. 1999. The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin-Furman, Kate, and Lake, Milli. 2018. “Ethics Abroad: Fieldwork in Fragile and Violent Contexts.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 607–14.Google Scholar
Davis, Darren W., and Silver, Brian D.. 2003. “Stereotype Threat and Race of Interviewer Effects in a Survey on Political Knowledge.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 3345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Justine M. 2020. “Manipulating Africa? Perspectives on the Experimental Method in the Study of African Politics.” African Affairs 119 (476): 452–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Justine M., and Michelitch, Kristin. 2022. “Field Experiments: Thinking Through Identity and Positionality.” DOI:10.1017/S1049096522000671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desposato, Scott. 2015. Ethics and Experiments: Problems and Solutions for Social Scientists and Policy Professionals. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Lee Ann. 2017. Interviewing in Social Science Research: A Relational Approach. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Glennerster, Rachel, and Takavarasha, Kudzai. 2013. Running Randomized Evaluations: A Practical Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Nicholas, Haenschen, Katherine, Kumar, Tanu, Panagopoulos, Costas, Peyton, Kyle, Ravanilla, Nico, and Sierra-Arevalo, Michael. 2021. “Organizational Identity and Positionality in Randomized Control Trials: Considerations and Advice for Collaborative Research Teams.” Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University. Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Brian, and Michelson, Melissa. 2022. “LGBTQ Scholarship: Researcher Identity, RCTs, & Ingroup Positionality.” PS: Political Science & Politics. DOI:10.1017/S1049096522000038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Frances B. 2009. “‘We Thought You Would Be White’: Race and Gender in Fieldwork.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (2): 291–94.Google Scholar
Henry, Marsha Giselle. 2003. “‘Where Are You Really From?’: Representation, Identity, and Power in the Fieldwork Experiences of a South Asian Diasporic.” Qualitative Research 3 (2): 229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Biz D., Panin, Amma, Wellman, Elizabeth, Blair, Graeme, Pruett, Lindsay, Opalo, Ken Ochieng’, Alarian, Hannah M., Grossman, Allison N., Tan, Yvonne, Dyzenhaus, Alex, and Owsley, Nicholas. 2009. “Field Experiments in the Global South Assessing Risks, Localizing Benefits, and Addressing Positionality.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (2): 291–94.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan. 2015. “Reflections on the Ethics of Social Experimentation.” Journal of Globalization and Development 6 (1): 87112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karim, Sabrina. 2020. “Relational State Building in Areas of Limited Statehood: Experimental Evidence on the Attitudes of the Police.” American Political Science Review 114 (2): 536–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karim, Sabrina, and Beardsley, Kyle. 2017. Equal Opportunity Peacekeeping: Women, Peace, and Security in Post-Conflict States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Eunji. Forthcoming. “Entertaining Beliefs in Economic Mobility.” American Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
Lewis, Chloé, Banga, Alfred, Cimanuka, Ghislain, Hategekimana, Jean De Dieu, Lake, Milli, and Pierotti, Rachael. 2019. “Walking the Line: Brokering Humanitarian Identities in Conflict Research.” Civil Wars 21 (2): 200227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Evan, and Zhou, Yang-Yang. 2020. “Self-Efficacy and Citizen Engagement in Development: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 9 (1): 4663. DOI:10.1017/XPS.2020.47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyall, Jason, Zhou, Yang-Yang, and Imai, Kosuke. 2020. “Can Economic Assistance Shape Combatant Support in Wartime? Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan.” American Political Science Review 114 (1): 126–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, Efrén O. 2021. Diversity’s Child: People of Color and the Politics of Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramazanoglu, Caroline, and Holland, Janet. 2002. Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slough, Tara. 2019. “The Ethics of Electoral Experimentation: Design-Based Recommendations.” New York: Columbia University. Working Paper. Scholar
Soedirgo, Jessica, and Glas, Aarie. 2020. “Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (3): 527–31.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, Billig, Michael G., Bundy, Robert P., and Flament, Claude. 1971. “Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology 1 (2): 149–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teele, Dawn Langan, et al. 2014. “Reflections on the Ethics of Field Experiments.” In Field Experiments and Their Critics: Essays on the Uses and Abuses of Experimentation in the Social Sciences, ed. Teele, Dawn Langan, 115–40. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Marshall. 2009. “Research, Identities, and Praxis: The Tensions of Integrating Identity into the Field Experience.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (2): 325–28.Google Scholar
Townsend-Bell, Erica. 2009. “Being True and Being You: Race, Gender, Class, and the Fieldwork Experience.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (2): 311–14.Google Scholar
Wolf, Diane L. 2018. Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Yang-Yang. 2019. “How Refugee Resentment Shapes National Identity and Citizen Participation in Africa.” 2018 APSA Annual Meeting Paper. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Zou, Linda X., and Cheryan, Sapna. 2017. “Two Axes of Subordination: A New Model of Racial Position.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 112 (5): 696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed