Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-nzrtw Total loading time: 0.32 Render date: 2022-12-05T21:32:00.590Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Robert D. Putnam
Affiliation:
Harvard University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
1995 Annual Meeting Highlights
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bower, Robert T. 1985. The Changing Television Audience in America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brehm, John, and Rahn, Wendy. 1995. “An Audit of the Deficit in Social Capital.” Durham, NC: Duke University. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald. 1974. Political Change in Britain: The Evolution of Electoral Choice, 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplow, Theodore,Bahr, Howard M., Modell, John, and Chadwick, Bruce A. 1991. Recent Social Trends in the United States: 1960–1990. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. 1993. A Matter of Time: Risk and Opportunity in the Nonschool Hours: Executive Summary. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.Google Scholar
Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Comstock, George,Chaffee, Steven, Katzman, Natan, McCombs, Maxwell, and Roberts, Donald. 1978. Television and Human Behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Comstock, George. 1989. The Evolution of American Television. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Condry, John. 1993. “Thief of Time, Unfaithful Servant: Television and the American Child,” Daedalus 122 (Winter): 259–78.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1976. The Dynamics of Party Support: Cohort-Analyzing Party Identification. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cutler, Blaine. 1990. “Where Does the Free Time Go?” American Demographics (November): 3639.Google Scholar
Davis, James Allan, and Smith, Tom W.General Social Surveys, 1972–1994. [machine readable data file]. Principal Investigator, Davis, James A.; Director and Co-Principal Investigator, Smith, Tom W. NORC ed. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, producer, 1994; Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, distributor.Google Scholar
Dobb, Anthony N., and Macdonald, Glenn F. 1979. “Television Viewing and Fear of Victimization: Is the Relationship Causal?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 170–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Patricia Klobus,Edwards, John N., and Watts, Ann DeWitt, “Women, Work, and Social Participation.” Journal of Voluntary Action Research 13 (January–March, 1984), 722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. 1966. American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Gerbner, George,Gross, Larry, Morgan, Michael, and Signorielli, Nancy. 1980. “The ‘Mainstreaming’ of America: Violence Profile No. 11,” Journal of Communication 30 (Summer): 1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginzberg, Eli. The Unemployed. 1943. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Glenn, Norval D. 1987. “Social Trends in the United States: Evidence from Sample Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51: S109–S126.Google Scholar
Grabner, Doris A. 1993. Mass Media and American Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Paul M.The ‘Scary World’ of the Nonviewer and Other Anomalies: A Reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s Findings on Cultivation Analysis, Part I,” Communication Research 7 (October): 403–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Michael. 1980. “The Fruits of Cultivation Analysis: A Re-examination of the Effects of Television Watching on Fear of Victimization, Alienation, and the Approval of Violence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 44: 287303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahoda, Marie,Lazarsfeld, Paul, and Zeisel, Hans. 1933. Marienthal. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl. 1952. “The Problem of Generations.” In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, ed. Kecsckemeti, Paul. New York: Oxford University Press: 276322.Google Scholar
Meyrowitz, Joshua. 1985. No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren F., and Shanks, J. Merrill. 1995. The American Voter Reconsidered. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1992. “The Puzzle Transformed: Explaining Declining Turnout.” Political Behavior 14: 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, Ithiel de Sola. 1973. “Public Opinion.” In Handbook of Communication, ed. Pool, Ithiel de Sola et al. Chicago: Rand McNally: 779835.Google Scholar
Pool, Ithiel de Sola. 1990. Technologies Without Boundaries: On Telecommunications in a Global Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Postman, Neil. 1985. Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Viking-Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Public Perspective. 1995. “People, Opinion, and Polls: American Popular Culture.” 6 (August/September): 3748.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1995. “Bowling Alone, Revisited,” The Responsive Community (Spring): 1833.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1996. “Bowling Alone: Democracy in America at the End of the Twentieth Century,” forthcoming in a collective volume edited by Axel Hadenius. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, John. 1981. “Television and Leisure Time: A New Scenario,” Journal of Communication 31 (Winter): 120–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, John. 1990a. “The Time Squeeze.” American Demographics (February).Google Scholar
Robinson, John. 1990b. “I Love My TV.” American Demographics (September): 2427.Google Scholar
Robinson, John, and Godbey, Geoffrey. 1995. Time for Life. College Park, MD: University of Maryland. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1985. “Blame Dismal World Conditions on … Baseball. Miami Herald (May 18): 27A.Google Scholar
Schor, Juliet. 1991. The Overworked American. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sharkansky, Ira. 1969. “The Utility of Elazar's Political Culture.” Polity 2: 6683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist. 1995. “The Solitary Bowler.” 334 (18 February): 2122.Google Scholar
Timmer, S. G.,Eccles, J., and O'Brien, I. 1985. “How Children Use Time.” In Time, Goods, and Well-Being, ed. Juster, F. T. and Stafford, F. B.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1995 (and earlier years). Current Population Reports. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M. 1995. “Faith, Hope, and Charity: Social Capital, Trust, and Collective Action.” College Park, MD: University of Maryland. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney,Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcock, Richard, and Franke, Walter H. 1963. Unwanted Workers. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Williams, Tannis Macbeth, ed. 1986. The Impact of Television: A Natural Experiment in Three Communities. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
498
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *