Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Contemporary Views of Liberal Democracy and the 2016 Presidential Election

  • William D. Hicks (a1), Seth C. McKee (a2) and Daniel A. Smith (a3)

Abstract

What are Americans’ views on liberal democracy? Have their attitudes changed since the 1950s? How do their attitudes about liberal democracy shape political behavior, such as vote choice? We replicated McClosky’s (1964) seminal study on a module to the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study. Our exploration of 26 survey questions reveals both continuity and change in Americans’ attitudes toward liberal democracy. Whereas Americans have become more hostile toward some standard democratic procedural rules of the game, we also find that they harbor more tolerant attitudes toward racial and ethnic equality. We subjected respondents’ answers to an exploratory factor analysis, which reveals three distinct dimensions regarding democratic values: elitism, authoritarianism, and racial supremacy. We find that elitism and racial supremacy significantly influenced political behavior in the 2016 presidential election and note that these factors contributed to mass unrest in 2020, exposing fault lines deeply rooted in America’s contentious political history.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2011. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?Journal of Politics 70 (2): 542–55.
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Webster, Steven W.. 2016. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41:1222.
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Webster, Steven W.. 2018. “Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties but Behave Like Rabid Partisans.” Advances in Political Psychology 39:119–35.
Banks, Antoine J. 2014. Anger and Racial Politics: The Emotional Foundation of Racial Attitudes in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David E., 206–61. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Fleisher, Richard, and Bond, John R.. 2004. “The Shrinking Middle in the US Congress.” British Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 429–51.
Gibson, James L. 2008. “Intolerance and Political Repression in the United States: A Half Century after McCarthyism.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 96108.
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hafner, Josh. 2016. “Donald Trump Loves the ‘Poorly Educated’—and They Love Him.” USA Today, February 24. Available at www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/02/24/donald-trump-nevada-poorly-educated/80860078.
Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 619–31.
Hicks, William D., McKee, Seth C., and Smith, Daniel A.. 2020. Replication data for “Contemporary Views of Liberal Democracy and the 2016 Presidential Election.” Available at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TL3BLS, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:6Uhz9eX4QaOHXnXRw+aZYw==[fileUNF].
Jewitt, Caitlin E., and Goren, Paul. 2016. “Ideological Structure and Consistency in the Age of Polarization.” American Politics Research 44 (1): 81105.
Kinder, Donald R., and Kalmoe, Nathan P.. 2017. Neither Liberal nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Krosnick, Jon. 1991. “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5 (3): 213–36.
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lupton, Robert N., Myers, William M., and Thornton, Judd R.. 2015. “Political Sophistication and the Dimensionality of Elite and Mass Attitudes, 1980–2004.” Journal of Politics 77 (2): 368–80.
Mason, Lilliana. 2018. “Ideologues without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (S1): 866–87.
McClosky, Herbert. 1964. “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics.” American Political Science Review 58 (2): 361–82.
Phoenix, Davin L. 2019. The Anger Gap: How Race Shapes Emotion in Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reilly, Katie. 2016. “Read Hillary Clinton’s ‘Basket of Deplorables’ Remarks About Donald Trump Supporters.” TIME, September 10. Available at https://time.com/4486502/hillary-clinton-basket-of-deplorables-transcript.
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Valentino, Nicholas A., Neuner, Fabian G., and Vandenbroek, L. Matthew. 2018. “The Changing Norms of Racial Political Rhetoric and the End of Racial Priming.” Journal of Politics 80 (3): 757–71.
Webster, Steven W., and Abramowitz, Alan I.. 2017. “The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate.” American Politics Research 45 (4): 621–47.
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Hicks et al. Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary materials

Hicks et al. supplementary material
Hicks et al. supplementary material

 PDF (149 KB)
149 KB

Contemporary Views of Liberal Democracy and the 2016 Presidential Election

  • William D. Hicks (a1), Seth C. McKee (a2) and Daniel A. Smith (a3)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.