Skip to main content Accessibility help

Decision Making at the State and Local Level: Does Science Matter?

  • Susan G. Mason (a1)
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.

Science is believed to be an important part of public policy decision making because of its inherent characteristics of measurability, rigor, objectivity, replication, and peer review. The purpose of this research was to explore the linkage of science to public policy decision making. The research explores what state and local public officials know about science and how much they actually use science in their decision making. Interview results with public officials in the State of Idaho demonstrate that policy makers ultimately see science as only one element in the mix. Findings suggest that equal attention and debate should be given to how science interacts with all of the other factors that affect the public policy making process.

Hide All
Ashford, Nicholas. 1994. “Value Judgments and Risk Assessment.” In Chemical Risk Assessment and Occupational Health, ed. Mark Smith, C., Christiana, David, and Kelsey, Karl, 197203. Westport, CT: Auburn House.
Buck, Eugene M., Corn, Lynne, and Baldwin, Pamela. 2007. “The Endangered Species Act and ‘Sound Science.’” CRS Report for Congress. Washington, DC: CRS.
Burnett, H. Sterling. 1999. “Openness Protects Science and the Decisions That Follow.” Idaho Statesman, August 1, 7B.
Byerly, Radford, and Pielke, Roger Jr., 1995. “The Changing Ecology of United States Science.” Science 269: 1531–2.
Cozzens, Susan, and Woodhouse, Edward. 1995. “Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes.” In Handbook of Science and Technology, ed. Jasanoff et al., 533–53.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dahlstrom, Michael F. 2014. “Using Narratives and Storytelling to Communicate Science with Non-expert Audiences.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (4): 13614–20.
Fischoff, Baruch, and Scheufele, Dietram A.. 2014. “The Science of Science Communication II.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (4): 13583–4.
Foray, Domonique, and Kazancigil, Ali. 1999. Science, Economics and Democracy: Selected Issues. Prepared for the World Conference on Science, UNESCO–ICSU. Budapest, Hungary, June 26–July 1:12.
Graham, John, Green, Laura, and Roberts, Marc. 1988. In Search of Safety: Chemicals and Cancer Risk. New York: Plenum Press.
Hoover, Kenneth, and Donovan, Todd. 2008. The Elements of Social Science Thinking, 9th edition. Boston: Thomson-Wadsworth.
Isaak, Alan C. 1985. Scope and Methods of Political Science, 4th edition. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 1994. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Joy, Billy. 2000. “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us.” Wired 8: 238–62.
Karl, Herman A., Scarlett, Lynne, Vargas-Moreno, Juan Carlos, and Flaxman, Michael. 2012. Restoring Lands: Coordinating Science, Politics and Action. New York: Springer.
Kraft, Michael E. 2011. Environmental Policy and Politics, 5th edition. Boston: Longman.
Lach, Denise, List, Peter, Steel, Brent, and Shindler, Bruce. 2003. “Advocacy and Credibility of Ecological Scientists in Resource Decision Making: A Regional Study.” BioScience 55 (2): 170–8.
Litfin, Karen. 1994. Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Meyer, Ryan. 2006. “Intractable Debate: Why Congressional Hearings on Climate Fail to Advance Policy.” Perspectives in Public Affairs 3: 8599.
Miller, Norman. 2009. Environmental Politics: Stakeholders, Interests, and Policymaking, 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.
Mooney, Chris. 2004. “Beware ‘Sound Science.’” Washington Post National Weekly Edition, March 8–14, p. 23.
Robison, Wade. 1994. Decisions in Doubt: The Environment and Public Policy. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
Sabatier, Paul. 2007. “The Need for Better Theories.” In Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd edition, ed. Sabatier, Paul, 318. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sarewitz, Daniel. 1996. Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress, Progress. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Schmandt, Jurgen. 1984. “Regulation and Science.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 9: 2338.
Silver, Brian L. 1998. The Ascent of Science. New York: Solomon Press.
Skodvin, Tora, and Underdal, Arild. 2000. “Exploring the Dynamics of the Science–Politics Interaction.” In Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes, ed. Andresen, Steinar, Skodvin, Tora, Underdal, Arild, and Wettestad, Jorgen, 2234. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
Skolnikoff, Eugene. 1999. “The Role of Science in Policy: The Climate Change Debate in the United States.” Environment 41: 2338.
Steel, Brent, Clinton, Richard, and Lovrich, Nicholas. 2003. Environmental Politics and Policy: A Comparative Approach. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Steel, Brent, List, Peter, Lach, Denise, and Shindler, Bruce. 2004. “The Role of Scientist in the Environmental Policy Process: A Case Study from the American West.” Environmental Science & Policy 7: 111.
Underdal, Arild. 2000. Science and Politics: The Anatomy of an Uneasy Partnership, In Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes, ed. Andresen, Steinar, Skodvin, Tora, Underdal, Arild, and Wettestad, Jorgen, 120. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
US General Accounting Office. 2007. Climate Change Research. GAO-07-1172. Washington, DC.
Van Beek, Jac, and Isaacs, Frances. 2008. “Convergence and Scientific Management” In Innovation, Science, and Environment: Canadian Policies and Performance, 2008–2009. ed. Toner, Glen, 209–29. Montreal, Canada: McGill Queen’s University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Mason supplementary material
Appendix A

 Word (16 KB)
16 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

A correction has been issued for this article: