Skip to main content Accesibility Help

Determinants of Representatives' Votes on the Flake Amendment to End National Science Foundation Funding of Political Science Research

  • Joseph E. Uscinski (a1) and Casey A. Klofstad (a2)

In May 2012, political scientists learned of efforts by representative Jeff Flake (R-AZ) to eliminate political science funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF) budget. The American Political Science Association (APSA) was caught off-guard, and concerned political scientists scrambled to contact their representatives and urge the amendment's defeat. Flake's initial effort to cut funds overall from the NSF was defeated, but a second measure, specifically to keep the NSF from funding political science, passed only hours later. This was the second time in three years that legislators targeted the NSF Political Science Program. Although these measures have been sponsored and widely supported by Republicans, some Democrats have supported these measures as well. This article examines the vote on the Flake Amendment to understand why individual representatives voted for or against cutting NSF funding for political science research.

Hide All
Bawn, Kathleen, and Koger, Gregory. 2008. “Effort, Intensity and Position Taking: Reconsidering Obstruction in the Pre-Cloture Senate.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 20: 6792.
Cardiff, Christopher, and Klein, Daniel B. 2005. “Faculty Partisan Affiliations in All Disciplines: A Voter-Registration.” Critical Review 17: 237–55.
A Different Agenda.” 2012. Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science 487.
Fenno, Richard. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
Klein, Ezra. 2012. “Jeff Flake's Plan to Politicize the National Science Foundation.” The Washington Post.
Lane, Charles. 2012. “Congress Should Cut Funding for Political Science Research.” The Washington Post.
Mayhew, David R. 1974. “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals.” Polity 6: 295317.
Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57: 4556.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Rocca, Michael, Sanchez, Gabriel R., and Uscinski, Joseph E.. 2008. “Descriptive Attributes of Latino Representatives.” Social Science Quarterly 89: 392405.
Snyder, James M., and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 193211.
Stevens, Jacqueline 2012. “Political Scientists Are Lousy Forecasters.” The New York Times Sunday Review.
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2001. “Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.”
Uscinski, Joseph E., and Klofstad, Casey A.. 2010. “Who Likes Political Science?: Determinants of Senators' Votes on the Coburn Amendment.” PS: Political Science & Politics 43: 701–06.
Uscinski, Joseph, Rocca, Michael S., Sanchez, Gabriel R., and Brenden, Marina. 2009. “Congress and Foreign Policy: Congressional Action on the Darfur Genocide.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42: 489–96.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed