Skip to main content

Does an EMILY's List Endorsement Predict Electoral Success, or Does EMILY Pick the Winners?

  • Rebecca J. Hannagan (a1), Jamie P. Pimlott (a2) and Levente Littvay (a3)

Women's political action committees (PACs)—those committees founded by women to raise money for women candidates—have been and will likely continue to be an important part of American electoral politics. In this article, we investigate the impact of EMILY's List, because it is the standard bearer of women's PACs and is commonly cited as crucial to women's electoral success. Empirical studies of EMILY's List impact to date have largely assumed causal inference by using traditional linear models. We use a propensity score–matching model to leverage on causality and find that an EMILY endorsement helps some candidates and hurts others. Our findings set the stage for further and more nuanced investigations of when, where, and how EMILY's List can enhance the likelihood of electoral success for women.

Hide All
Aldrich John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aldrich John H. 2000. “Southern Parties in the State and Nation.” Journal of Politics 63: 643–70.
Burrell Barbara. 1990. “The Presence of Women Candidates and the Role of Gender in Campaigns for the State Legislature in an Urban Setting.” Women and Politics 10: 85102.
Burrell Barbara. 1993. “Party Decline, Party Transformation, and Gender Politics: The USA.” In Gender and Party Politics, ed. Lovenduski Joni and Norris Pippa, 291308. New York: Sage.
Burrell Barbara. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Burrell Barbara. 2006. “Political Parties and Women's Organizations: Bringing Women into the Electoral Arena.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, ed. Carroll Susan J. and Fox Richard L., 143–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burton Michael John, and Shea Daniel M.. 2002. Campaign Mode: Strategic Vision in Congressional Elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Center for American Women, and Politics (CAWP). 2008. Fact Sheet: Women in Elective Office. Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
Cooperman Rosalyn. 2001. “Party Organizations and the Recruitment of Women Candidates to the U.S. House since the ‘Year of the Woman.’” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, August 30–September 2.
Darcy R., Welch Susan, and Clark Janet. 1994. Women, Elections and Representation. 2nd ed.Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Day Christine L., and Hadley Charles D.. 2005. Women's PACs: Abortion and Elections. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Dehejia Rajeev H., and Wahba Sadek. 2002. “Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies.” Review of Economics and Statistics 84: 151–61.
Delli Carpini M., and Fuchs E. R.. 1993. “The Year of the Woman: Candidates, Voters, and the 1992 Elections.” Political Science Quarterly 108: 2936.
Duerst-Lahti Georgia. 1998. “The Bottle Neck, Women Candidates.” In Women in Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Thomas Sue and Wilcox Clyde, 1525. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eagly Alice H., and Carli Linda L.. 2008. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Hartmann Susan M. 1989. From Margin to Mainstream: American Women and Politics since 1960. New York: Knopf.
Lawless Jennifer L. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57: 479–90.
Lawless Jennifer L., and Fox Richard. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lawless Jennifer L., and Pearson Kathryn. 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Politics 69: 11761209.
Mayhew David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
McDermott Rose. 2002. “Experimental Methodology in Political Science.” Political Analysis 10:325–42.
Niven David. 2006. “Throwing Your Hat Out of the Ring: Negative Recruitment and the Gender Imbalance in State Legislative Candidacy.” Politics and Gender 2: 473–89.
Pimlott Jamie P. 2006. “This Isn't Your Mother's Tupperware Party: How EMILY's List Changed the American Political Landscape.” Ph.D. diss., University of Florida.
Pimlott Jamie P. 2007. “The Chosen Few: EMILY's List Endorsements, 2000–2006.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 12–15.
Rosenbaum Paul, and Rubin D.. 1983. “The Central Role of Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70:4155.
Sanbonmatsu Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 2034.
Sanbonmatsu Kira. 2006a. “Do Parties Know that ‘Women Win’? Party Leader Beliefs about Women's Electoral Chances.” Politics and Gender 2: 431–50.
Sanbonmatsu Kira. 2006b. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Schlozman Kay Lehman, and Uhlaner Carole Jean. 1986. “Candidate Gender and Congressional Campaign Receipts.” Journal of Politics 48: 3050.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 151 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.