Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Engaging Women: Addressing the Gender Gap in Women’s Networking and Productivity

  • Tiffany D. Barnes (a1) and Emily Beaulieu (a1)
Abstract

Women earn 40% of new PhDs in political science; however, once they enter the profession, they have strikingly different experiences than their male counterparts—particularly in the small but influential field of political methodology. For several years, the Society for Political Methodology, with support from the National Science Foundation, has attempted to address this gender gap through the Visions in Methodology (VIM) program. VIM features an annual conference that brings women together to present and discuss their research and to participate in professional-development sessions. Do programs like VIM have the desired impact? Using an original survey of political scientists, this study provides insights into the ways that bringing women together in small-group settings like VIM might facilitate networking and enhance productivity. In particular, the study finds that women who attend the VIM conference are better networked and more productive in terms of publication.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Engaging Women: Addressing the Gender Gap in Women’s Networking and Productivity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Engaging Women: Addressing the Gender Gap in Women’s Networking and Productivity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Engaging Women: Addressing the Gender Gap in Women’s Networking and Productivity
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Achen, Christopher H. 2014. “Why Do We Need Diversity in the Political Methodology Society?” The Political Methodologist 21 (2): 25.
Bagilhole, Barbara and Goode, Jackie. 2001. “The Contradiction of the Myth of Individual Merit, and the Reality of a Patriarchal Support System in Academic Careers: A Feminist Investigation.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 21 (8): 161–80.
Barnes, Tiffany D. 2016. Gendering Legislative Behavior: Institutional Constraints and Collaboration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barnes, Tiffany D. 2014. “Women’s Representation and Legislative Committee Appointments: The Case of the Argentine Province.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 23 (2): 135–63.
Blau, Francine, Currie, Janet M., Coroson, Rachel T. A., and Ginther, Donna K.. 2010. “Can Mentoring Help Female Assistant Professors? Interim Results from a Randomized Trial.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 15707.
Breuning, Marijke and Sanders, Kathryn. 2007. “Gender and Journal Authorship in Eight Prestigious Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (2): 347–51.
Dion, Michelle. 2014. “An Effort to Increase Women’s Participation: The Visions in Methodology Initiative.” The Political Methodologist 21 (2): 6.
Franceschet, Susan and Piscopo, Jennifer. 2014. “Sustaining Gendered Practices? Power and Elite Networks in Argentina.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (1): 86111.
Hesli, Vicki L., Lee, Jea Mook, and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2012. “Predicting Rank Attainment in Political Science: What Else Besides Publications Affects Promotion?” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (3): 475–92.
Maliniak, Daniel, Powers, Ryan, and Walter, Barara F.. 2013. “The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations.” International Organization 67 (4): 889922.
Manuel, Tiffany, Shefte, Susan, and Swiss, Deborah. 1999. Suiting Themselves: Women’s Leadership Styles in Today’s Workplace. Cambridge, MA: Radcliffe Public Policy Institute and the Boston Club.
Mathews, Lanethea and Anderson, Kristi. 2001. “A Gender Gap in Publishing? Women’s Representation in Edited Political Science Books.” PS: Political Science & Politics 34 (1): 143–7.
Mead, Lawrence M. 2010. “Scholasticism in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (2): 453–64.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, Lange, Samantha, and Brus, Holly. 2013. “Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations Journals.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 485–92.
O’Brien, Diana Z. 2015. “Rising to the Top: Gender, Political Performance, and Party Leadership in Advanced Articles Industrial Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 1022–39.
Sedowski, Leanne and Brintnall, Michael. 2007. “Data Snapshot: The Proportion of Women in the Political Science Profession.” American Political Science Association. Available at http://apsanet3b.inetu.net/imgtest/Website brief on women in PS v2 1 2007.pdf.
Teele, Dawn L. and Thelen, Kathleen. 2017. “Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics, Forthcoming.
Teodorescu, Daniel. 2000. “Correlates of Faculty Publication Productivity: A Cross-National Analysis.” Higher Education 39 (2): 201–22.
Young, Cheryl D. 1995. “An Assessment of Articles Published by Women in the 15 Top Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 28 (3): 525–33.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Barnes and Beaulieu supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (166 KB)
166 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 138 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 579 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 31st March 2017 - 16th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.