Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-16T01:49:35.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Environmental Science/Policy Interface: Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries with a Team-Teaching Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

David Schlosberg  and
Thomas D. Sisk
David Schlosberg
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Thomas D. Sisk
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 33 , Special Issue 1: The Public Value of Political Science Research , March 2000 , pp. 75 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2000

References

Dryzek, John. 1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, Paul R., and Ehrlich, Anne H. 1996. Betrayal of Science and Reason. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Frank. 1995. “Hazardous Waste Policy, Community Movements and the Politics of Nimby: Participatory Risk Assessment in the USA and Canada.” In Greening Environmental Policy: The Politics of a Sustainable Future, ed. Fischer, Frank and Black, Michael. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism as a Site of Discourse on the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Patsy. 1993. “Planning through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, ed. Fischer, Frank and Forester, John. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles. 1959. “The Science of Muddling Through.” Public Administration Review 19(Spring): 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles. 1982. “The Market as Prison.” Journal of Politics 44(2): 324–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, D., and Walters, C.J. 1989. “A Robust Method for Parameter Estimation from Catch and Effort Data.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46(1): 137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Peter. 1998. “The Precautionary Principle.” Rachel's Environment & Health Weekly, February 19.Google Scholar
Ross, Andrew. 1996. “Introduction.” In Science Wars, ed. Ross, Andrew. Durham: Duke University Press Google Scholar
Sclove, Richard. 1995. Democracy and Technology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Soulé, Michael E., and Press, Daniel. 1998. “What Is Environmental Studies?” Bio-Science 48(5): 397–405.Google Scholar
Stauber, John, and Rampton, Sheldon.1995. Toxic Sludge Is Good For You! Lies, Damn Lies, and the Public Relations Industry. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1996. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar