Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-05T11:13:24.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In the Supreme Court Justices' Shoes: Critical ThinkingThrough the Use of Hypothetical Case Law Analyses and InteractiveSimulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2005

Richard J. (Rick) Hardy
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Columbia
Chapman Rackaway
Affiliation:
Fort Hays State University
Laurie E. Sonnier
Affiliation:
St. Martin High School—Jackson County (MS) Schools

Extract

Judicial decisions are an integral part of American politics and,despite the presence of written and explicated opinions of federaljudges, the internal deliberations and decision making processes ofjudges themselves remains a mystery to many. A burgeoning body ofliterature focuses on the use of simulations to engage students andbridge theory to practical application. Few simulations target thejudicial component of politics, despite its natural disposition forgroup participation in a simulation project.Richard J. (Rick) Hardy is the director of theInstitute for Leadership in Civic Education, director of theNational Institute for Advanced Civic Studies (sponsored by theCenter for Civic Education), and assistant director of theHonors College at the University of Missouri-Columbia. Heregularly teaches courses in American politics, constitutionallaw, and the Supreme Court. His publications include:Government in America (Houghton Mifflin),Missouri Government and Politics (MissouriPress), Civic Education (Pearson), andPolitics: The Art of Drawing Dividing Lines(Thomson). Hardy also serves as a political commentator fornumerous national outlets and is a presidential elector in theElectoral College. Chapman Rackaway teaches courses in Americangovernment, political campaign management, political parties,and voting behavior at Fort Hays State University. He is thedirector and advisor for the Political Campaigns and Managementtract at FHSU. He has published in the Journal ofPolitics and has consulted on numerous state andnational political races. Laurie E. Sonnier currently teachessocial studies courses at St. Martin high school in OceanSprings, Mississippi. She earned her B.A. in political scienceat the University of Southern Mississippi and her M.Ed. inEducation from Bowie State University. Laurie has won numerousteaching awards and has been actively involved with the NationalCouncil for the Social Studies and the Center for CivicEducation. She is the co-editor of Voices of Advocacy inAmerican Democracy (Pearson).

Information

Type
THE TEACHER
Copyright
© 2005 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baker, Nancy V. 1994. “Oyez, Oyez, Oyez: The Trials of Teaching the Supreme Court.” PS: Political Science and Politics 27 (June): 253255.Google Scholar
Berger, Raoul. 1997. Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Second Edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Endersby, James W., and David J. Webber. 1995. “Iron Triangle Simulation: A Role-Playing Game for Undergraduates in Congress, Interest Groups, and Public Policy Classes.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (September): 520523.Google Scholar
Hall, Kermit et al., eds. 1999a. American Legal History: Cases and Materials. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hall, Kermit. 1999b. The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Richard J., James D. King, and James W. Riddlesperger Jr. 1982. “The Presidential Selection Process: Role Playing in a Large American Government Class.” Simulation and Games 13 (December): 451467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensley, Thomas R. 1993. “Come to the Edge: Role Playing Activities in a Constitutional Law Class.” PS: Political Science and Politics 26 (March): 6468.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Kurt W. 1999. “The Bosnian War Crimes Trial Simulation: Teaching Students about the Fuzziness of World Politics and International Law.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32(September): 589592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Ken. 1980. Simulations: A Handbook for Teachers. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Lyn, Kathlene, and Judd Choate. 1999. “Running for Elected Office: A Ten-Week Political Campaign Simulation for Upper-Division Courses.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (March): 6976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacelle, Richard L. 1989. “Simulating Supreme Court Decision Making.” Political Science Teacher 2: 911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Elizabeth T., and Mark A. Boyer. 1996. “Designing In-Class Simulations.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (December): 690694.Google Scholar
Twelker, Paul. 1973. “A Basic Reference Shelf on Simulation and Gaming.” In The Guide to Simulations/Games for Education and Training, eds. David Zuckerman and Robert Horn. Lexington, MA: Information Services.Google Scholar
Vile, John R., and Thomas R. Van Dervort. 1994. “Revitalizing Undergraduate Programs through Intercollegiate Mock Trial Competition.” PS: Political Science and Politics 27 (December): 711717.Google Scholar
Whitaker, Steve. 1973. “A Role-Playing Simulation of the United States Supreme Court.” Teaching Political Science 1: 4753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodworth, James R., and W. Robert Gump. 1994. Camelot: A Role Playing Simulation for Political Decision Making. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar