Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Learning Political Science with Prediction Markets: An Experimental Study

  • Cali Mortenson Ellis (a1) and Rahul Sami (a1)
Abstract

Prediction markets are designed to aggregate the information of many individuals to forecast future events. These markets provide participants with an incentive to seek information and a forum for interaction, making markets a promising tool to motivate student learning. We carried out a quasi-experiment in an introductory political science class to study the effect of prediction markets on student engagement with the course topics. Although we found no significant improvement in students' enthusiasm or extent of topical reading, we did find that those students who were already reading broadly at the course start were more likely to trade actively in the markets. These findings indicate that prediction markets may be most successful as an education tool in settings, like graduate education, where individuals are already knowledgeable about the topics of the market, instead of an introductory learning context.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Learning Political Science with Prediction Markets: An Experimental Study
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Learning Political Science with Prediction Markets: An Experimental Study
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Learning Political Science with Prediction Markets: An Experimental Study
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Abramson, Paul R. 2010. “Using Intrade.com to Teach Campaign Strategies in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics 43 (1): 139–44.
Buckley, Patrick, Garvey, John, and McGrath, Fergal. 2011. “A Case Study on Using Prediction Markets as a Rich Environment for Active Learning.” Computers & Education 56: 418–28.
Duncan, T. G., and McKeachie, Wilbert J.. 2005. “The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.” Educational Psychologist 40 (2): 117–28.
Forsythe, Robert, Nelson, Forrest, Neumann, George R., and Wright, Jack. 1992. “Anatomy of an Experimental Political Stock Market.” American Economic Review 82 (5): 1142–61.
Hahn, Robert W., and Tetlock, Paul C.. 2003. “Using Information Markets to Improve Public Decision Making.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy (Summer); AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper No. 04-18.
Hanson, R. 2003. “Combinatorial Information Market Design.” Information Systems Frontiers 5 (1): 107–19.
Pintrich, Paul R., Smith, David A. F., Garcia, Teresa, and McKeachie, Wilbert J.. 1993. “Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).” Educational and Psychological Measurement 53 (3): 801–13.
Servan-Schreiber, Emile, Wolfers, Justin, Pennock, David M., and Galebach, Brian. 2004. “Prediction Markets: Does Money Matter?Electronic Markets 14 (3): 243–51.
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T.. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Sunstein, Cass R. 2006. “Deliberating Groups versus Prediction Markets (or Hayek's Challenge to Habermas).” Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3 (3): 192213.
Whitton, Nicola. 2007. “Motivation and Computer Game Based Learning.” In ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/whitton.pdf
Wolfers, Justin, and Zitzewitz, Eric. 2004. “Prediction Markets.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (2): 107–26.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed