Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Left Unchecked: Political Hegemony in Political Science and the Flaws It Can Cause

  • L.J Zigerell (a1)
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Left Unchecked: Political Hegemony in Political Science and the Flaws It Can Cause
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Left Unchecked: Political Hegemony in Political Science and the Flaws It Can Cause
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Left Unchecked: Political Hegemony in Political Science and the Flaws It Can Cause
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

Copyright

References

Hide All
American Association of University Professors. 2009. “Statement on Professional Ethics.” Adopted 1966, revised 1987 and 2009. Available at https://web.archive.org/web/20181116010502/https://www.aaup.org/report/statement-professional-ethics.
American National Election Studies (ANES). 2017. “User’s Guide and Codebook for the ANES 2016 Time Series Study.” Ann Arbor, MI, and Palo Alto, CA: University of Michigan and Stanford University.
American National Election Studies, University of Michigan and Stanford University. 2017. “ANES 2016 Time Series Study.Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2017-09-19. Available at https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36824.v2.
American Political Science Association. 2012. “A Guide to Professional Ethics in Political Science.Second edition. Washington, DC.
American Political Science Association. 2018a. “Committee on the Status of Women in the Profession.” Available at https://web.archive.org/web/20180329122250/http://www.apsanet.org/statuscommitteewomen.
American Political Science Association. 2018b. “Minority Student Recruitment Program.” Available at https://web.archive.org/web/20180429130116/http://www.apsanet.org/msrp.
American Political Science Association. 2018c. “Status Committees.” Available at https://web.archive.org/web/20180429130141/https://www.apsanet.org/status-committees.
American Political Science Association. 2019. “Ralph Bunche Summer Institute Application Process.” Available at https://web.archive.org/web/20190201140935/https://www.apsanet.org/DIVERSITY/Ralph-Bunche-Summer-Institute/How-to-Apply.
Bracic, Ana, Israel-Trummel, Mackenzie, and Shortle, Allyson F.. 2018. “Is Sexism for White People? Gender Stereotypes, Race, and the 2016 Presidential Election.” Political Behavior (Early View): 127.
Cassese, Erin C., and Barnes, Tiffany D.. 2018. “Reconciling Sexism and Women’s Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races.” Political Behavior (Early View): 124.
Cassese, Erin C., and Holman, Mirya R.. 2019. “Playing the Woman Card: Ambivalent Sexism in the 2016 US Presidential Race.” Political Psychology 40 (1): 5574.
Ditto, Peter H., Liu, Brittany S., Clark, Cory J., Wojcik, Sean P., Chen, Eric E., Grady, Rebecca H., Celniker, Jared B., and Zinger, Joanne F.. 2019. “At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 14 (2): 273–91.
Duarte, José L., Crawford, Jarret T., Stern, Charlotta, Haidt, Jonathan, Jussim, Lee, and Tetlock, Philip E.. 2015. “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38: e130.
Frasure-Yokley, , Lorrie, . 2018. “Choosing the Velvet Glove: Women Voters, Ambivalent Sexism, and Vote Choice in 2016.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics 3 (1): 325.
Gampa, Anup, Wojcik, Sean, Motyl, Matt, Nosek, Brian A., and Ditto, Peter. 2019. “(Ideo)logical Reasoning: Ideology Impairs Sound Reasoning.” PsyArXiv, January 13. Available at doi:10.31234/osf.io/hspjz.
Gross, Neil, and Simmons, Solon. 2014. “The Social and Political Views of American College and University Professors.” In Professors and Their Politics, ed. Gross, Neil and Simmons, Solon, 19–50. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Honeycutt, Nathan, and Freberg, Laura. 2017. “The Liberal and Conservative Experience across Academic Disciplines: An Extension of Inbar and Lammers.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 8 (2): 115–23.
Klein, Daniel B., and Stern, Charlotta. 2005. “Professors and Their Politics: The Policy Views of Social Scientists.” Critical Review 17 (3–4): 257303.
Knuckey, Jonathan. 2018. “‘I Just Don’t Think She Has a Presidential Look’: Sexism and Vote Choice in the 2016 Election.” Social Science Quarterly (Early View): 117.
Lukianoff, Greg, and Haidt, Jonathan. 2018. The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting up a Generation for Failure. London: Penguin Press.
Maranto, Robert, Redding, Richard E., and Hess, Frederick M.. 2009. “The PC Academy Debate: Questions Not Asked.” In The Politically Correct University: Problems, Scope, and Reforms, ed. Maranto, Robert, Redding, Richard E., and Hess, Frederick M., 314. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Mitchell, Kristina M. W., and Martin, Jonathan. 2018. “Gender Bias in Student Evaluations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 648–52.
Nteta, Tatishe M., Brian Schaffner, , and MacWilliams, Matthew C.. 2017. “Racially Biased People Are Far More Likely to Oppose Black Athletes’ Protests. Here’s the Evidence.” The Monkey Cage, April 20. Available at https://web.archive.org/web/20170804211349/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/04/20/racial-bias-is-behind-opposition-to-black-athletes-protests-heres-the-evidence/.
R Core Team. 2018. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at www.R-project.org.
Schaffner, Brian F., MacWilliams, Matthew, and Nteta, Tatishe. 2018. “Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism.” Political Science Quarterly 133 (1): 934.
Sen, Maya. 2018. “Response to Dion, Sumner, and Mitchell.” Political Analysis 26 (3): 335–37.
Setzler, Mark, and Yanus, Alixandra B.. 2018. “Why Did Women Vote for Donald Trump?” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 523–27.
Simmons, Joseph P., Nelson, Leif D., and Simonsohn, Uri. 2011. “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant.” Psychological Science 22 (11): 1359–66.
Smith, Tom W., Davern, Michael, Freese, Jeremy, and Hout, Michael. 2019. “General Social Surveys, 1972–2018” [machine-readable data file]. Principal Investigator, Smith, Tom W.; Co-Principal Investigators, Davern, Michael, Freese, Jeremy, and Morgan, Stephen L., NORC Editor. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center. One data file (64,814 logical records) and one codebook (3,758 pages).
Staines, Heather. 2018. “Hypothesis and the Center for Open Science Collaborate on Annotation.” Hypothesis, February 8. Available at https://web.archive.org/web/20181025174806/https://web.hypothes.is/blog/cos-launch/.
StataCorp. 2017. “Stata Statistical Software: Release 15.” College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.
Taylor, Paul, Morin, Rich, Cohn, D’Vera, Clark, April, and Wang, Wendy. 2008. “A Paradox in Public Attitudes—Men or Women: Who’s the Better Leader?” Pew Research Center. Available at www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2010/10/gender-leadership.pdf.
Tetlock, Philip E. 1994. “Political Psychology or Politicized Psychology: Is the Road to Scientific Hell Paved with Good Moral Intentions?Political Psychology 15 (3): 509–29.
Valentino, Nicholas A., Wayne, Carly, and Oceno, Marzia. 2018. “Mobilizing Sexism: The Interaction of Emotion and Gender Attitudes in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (S1): 213–35.
Wickham, Hadley. 2016. “ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis.” New York: Springer-Verlag.
Zigerell, L. J 2017. “Reducing Political Bias in Political Science Estimates.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (1): 179–83.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Zigerell supplementary material
Zigerell supplementary material 1

 PDF (147 KB)
147 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed