Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Legitimacy and the UN Security Council Agenda

  • Brian Frederking (a1) and Christopher Patane (a2)

Abstract

Is the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) a legitimate organization? Do the veto powers legitimately pursue international security, or do they protect their narrow national interests? One way to evaluate the legitimacy of the UNSC is through its agenda. Does it address the most significant conflicts in world politics? Or is it influenced by the national interests of the veto powers? This article addresses these questions with a dataset that includes the number of UNSC meetings held and resolutions passed on 40 conflicts from 1991 to 2013. This analysis provides evidence for the legitimacy of the UNSC—conflicts with more refugees and more deaths are significantly more likely to be on the agenda. The analysis does not support critics of the UNSC—the national interests of the veto powers, measured as arms sales to and trade with the conflict participants, do not significantly alter the UNSC agenda.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Beardsley, Kyle and Schmidt, Holger. 2012. “Following the Flag or Following the Charter?” International Studies Quarterly 56 (1): 3349.
Binder, Martin. 2009. “Humanitarian Crises and the International Politics of Selectivity.” Human Rights Review 10 (3): 327–48.
Binder, Martin and Heupel, Monika. 2015. “The Legitimacy of the UN Security Council.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (2): 238–50.
Boulden, Jane. 2006. “Double Standards, Distance and Disengagement: Collective Legitimization in the Post–Cold War Security Council.” Security Dialogue 37 (3): 409–23.
Buchanan, Allen and Keohane, Robert O.. 2006. “The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions.” Ethics & International Affairs 20 (4): 405–37.
Claude, Inis L. 1966. “Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations.” International Organization 20 (3): 367–79.
Doyle, Michael W. and Sambanis, Nicholas. 2006. Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Finnemore, Martha. 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Fortna, Virginia Page. 2008. Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents’ Choices after Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gilligan, Michael J. and Stedman, Stephen J.. 2003. “Where Do the Peacekeepers Go?” International Studies Review 5 (4): 3754.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Wallensteen, Peter, Eriksson, Mikael, Sollenberg, Margareta, and Strand, Håvard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 39 (5): 615–37.
Hultman, Lisa. 2013. “UN Peace Operations and Protection of Civilians: Cheap Talk or Norm Implementation?” Journal of Peace Research 50 (1): 5972.
Hurd, Ian. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53 (3): 379408.
Hurd, Ian. 2002. “Legitimacy, Power, and the Symbolic Life of the UN Security Council.” Global Governance 8 (1): 3551.
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 347–61.
Lake, David A. 2007. “Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics.” International Security 32 (1): 4779.
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 19 (3): 549.
Melander, Erik. 2009. “Selected to Go Where Murderers Lurk? The Preventive Effect of Peacekeeping on Mass Killings of Civilians.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 26 (4): 389406.
Mor, Ben D. 2007. “Power and Rhetorical Bargaining: The UN Security Council Debate on the Iraq War.” Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations 21 (2): 229–47.
Morris, Justin and Wheeler, Nicholas J.. 2007. “The Security Council’s Crisis of Legitimacy and the Use of Force.” International Politics 44: 214–31.
Mullenbach, Mark J. 2005. “Deciding to Keep the Peace.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (3): 529–55.
Neack, Laura. 1995. “UN Peace Keeping: In the Interest of Community or Self?” Journal of Peace Research 32 (2): 181–96.
Onuf, Nicholas. 1989. World of Our Making. Columbia: South Carolina University Press.
Sundberg, Ralph. 2008. “Collective Violence 2002–2007: Global and Regional Trends.” In States in Armed Conflict 2007, ed. Harbom, Lotta and Sundberg, Ralph, 2441. Uppsala, Sweden: Universitetstryckeriet.
Thakur, Ramesh. 2010. “Law, Legitimacy, and the United Nations.” Melbourne Journal of International Law 11 (1): 126.
Themnér, Lotta and Wallensteen, Peter. 2014. “Armed Conflict, 1946–2013.” Journal of Peace Research 51 (4): 541–54.
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2003. “CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Version 2.1. Available at http://gking.harvard.edu.
Wallensteen, Peter and Johansson, Patrik. 2004. “Security Council Decisions in Perspective.” In The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century, ed. Malone, David, 1733. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Frederking and Patane supplementary material
Tables S1-S2

 PDF (47 KB)
47 KB

Legitimacy and the UN Security Council Agenda

  • Brian Frederking (a1) and Christopher Patane (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed