No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Lessons on Running a Laboratory Experiment (in Graduate School)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2018
Abstract
Experimentation has taken on a new life in political science. As the use of experimental methods proliferates, it is important for researchers to share their experiences and best practices, particularly with early-career researchers. This article provides reflections from practical experience in the laboratory, particularly geared toward graduate students and early-career researchers who are conducting their first laboratory experiment. These lessons do not apply only to first-time experimenters. Experiences are presented regarding time management, using confederates and deception, incentivizing participation, and keeping a laboratory notebook. Finally, early-career researchers are encouraged to “go for it” if the methods are appropriate to their research question.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018
References
REFERENCES
Butler, Daniel M. 2014. Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., and Broockman, David E.. 2011. “Do Politicians Racially Discriminate against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 463–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Taylor N., and Settle, Jaime E.. 2016. “Political Chameleons: An Exploration of Conformity in Political Discussions.” Political Behavior 38 (4): 817–59.Google Scholar
Dickson, Eric S. 2011. “Economics Vs. Psychology Experiments: Stylization, Incentives, and Deception.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, ed. Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur, 58–72. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur (eds.). 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gosnell, Harold F. 1926. “An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting.” American Political Science Review 20 (4): 869–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamenstadt, Ulrich. 2012. “Teaching Experimental Political Science: Experiences from a Seminar on Methods.” European Political Science 11 (1): 114–27.Google Scholar
Keele, Luke. 2015. “The Discipline of Identification.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (1): 102–106.Google Scholar
Kittel, Bernhard, Luhan, Wolfgang J., and Morton, Rebecca B. (eds.). 2012. Experimental Political Science: Principles and Practices. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitan, Lindsey C., and Verhulst, Brad. 2016. “Conformity in Groups: The Effects of Others’ Views on Expressed Attitudes and Attitude Change.” Political Behavior 38 (2): 277–315.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Daniel J., and Hatemi, Peter K.. 2013. “How Political Decisions Are Made: Social Conformity and Political Opinions.” Chicago: Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2002. “Experimental Methods in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 5 (1): 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2013. “The Ten Commandments of Experiments.” PS: Political Science & Politics 46 (3): 605–10.Google Scholar
Morton, Rebecca B., and Williams, Kenneth C.. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diane C. 2011. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar