Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A Liberal Polity: Ideological Homogeneity in Political Science

  • Mark Carl Rom (a1)
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A Liberal Polity: Ideological Homogeneity in Political Science
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A Liberal Polity: Ideological Homogeneity in Political Science
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A Liberal Polity: Ideological Homogeneity in Political Science
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aarøe, Lene, Petersen, Michael Bang, and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2017. “The Behavioral Immune System Shapes Political Intuitions: Why and How Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity Underlie Opposition to Immigration.” American Political Science Review 111 (2): 277–94.
Abrams, Samuel J. N. d. “The Search for Viewpoint Diversity in Higher Education.” Spectator USA. Available at https://spectator.us/viewpoint-diversity-higher-education.
Al-Gharbi, Musa. 2018. “In Social Research Fields, Conservatives Are the Most Underrepresented Group.” Quillette. Available at https://quillette.com/2018/04/05/social-research-fields-conservatives-underrepresented-group.
Al-Gharbi, Musa. 2019. “Campus and Community II: A Longitudinal Extension.” Heterodox Academy. Available at https://heterodoxacademy.org/campus-community-diversity-longitudinal-extension.
American Political Science Association. 2011. Political Science in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: APSA.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Taylor, Andrew J.. 2019. “Partisan Affiliation in Political Science: Insights from Florida and North Carolina.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): this issue.
Bloch, Matthew, Buchanan, Larry, Katz, Josh, and Quealy, Kevin. 2018. “An Extremely Detailed Map of the 2016 Presidential Election.” New York Times . Available at www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/upshot/election-2016-voting-precinct-maps.html.
Campbell, James E. 2019. “The Trust Is Gone: What Ideological Orthodoxy Costs Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): this issue.
Campus, Craziness. 2019. “Professor Turns Class into Trump Bashing 101.” Available at www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXeeVuqwlMk.
College Republicans of UW–Madison. 2019. “College Republicans of UW–Madison Respond to Recent Media Coverage Surrounding Course Syllabus.”
Cox, Daniel, Lienesch, Rachel, and Jones, Robert P.. 2017. “Who Sees Discrimination? Attitudes about Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, Race, and Immigration Status: Findings from PRRI’s American Values Atlas.” PRRI. Available at www.prri.org/research/americans-views-discrimination-immigrants-blacks-lgbt-sex-marriage-immigration-reform.
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Peyton, Buddy, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2007. “Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraq.” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 957–74. Available at https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/same-facts-different-interpretations-partisan-motivation-and-opin.
Gray, Phillip W. 2019. “Diagnosis vs. Ideological Diversity.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): this issue.
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–31. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2015. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 690707.
Katz, Eric. 2014. “There are More Republicans in the Federal Government than You Might ThinkGovernment Executive. August 14. Available at https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2015/08/there-are-more-republicans-federal-government-you-might-think/119138/.
Marineau, Josiah, and Williams, Shawn. 2019. “Intellectual Diversity at Religious Colleges.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): this issue.
McAuliffe, Kathleen. 2019. “Liberals and Conservatives React in Wildly Different Ways to Repulsive Pictures.” The Atlantic, March. Available at www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/03/the-yuck-factor/580465.
Mitchell, Dona-Gene, Hibbing, Matthew V., Smith, Kevin B., and Hibbing, J. R.. 2014. “Side by Side, Worlds Apart: Desired Policy Change as a Function of Preferences AND Perceptions.” American Politics Research 42 (2): 338–63. Available at https://journals-sagepub-com.proxy.library.georgetown.edu/doi/abs/10.1177/1532673X13498619#articleCitationDownloadContainer.
Moynihan, Donald. 2019. Constructing ‘Campus Craziness’. Heterodox Academy. Available at https://heterodoxacademy.org/academic-freedom-campus-craziness/.
Mulhere, Kaitlin. 2015. “House Committee Draws Criticism Again for Proposed Cuts to Social Sciences.” Inside Higher Ed, April 23. Available at www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/04/23/house-committee-draws-criticism-again-proposed-cuts-social-sciences.
Munro, Geoffrey D., Weih, Carrie, and Tsai, Jeffrey. 2010. “Motivated Suspicion: Asymmetrical Attributions of the Behavior of Political Ingroup and Outgroup Members.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 32 (2): 173–84.
Musgrave, Paul, and Rom, Mark. 2015. “Fair and Balanced? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Bias in Grading.” American Politics Research 43 (3): 536–54. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X14561655.
Mutz, Diana Carole. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pew Research Center. 2015. “Women and Leadership.” Available at www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/01/14/women-and-leadership.
Pew Research Center. 2016. “On Views of Race and Inequality, Blacks and Whites Are Worlds Apart.” Available at www.pewsocialtrends.org/2016/06/27/on-views-of-race-and-inequality-blacks-and-whites-are-worlds-apart.
Roettger, Walter B., and Winebrenner, Hugh. 1983. “The Voting Behavior of American Political Scientists: The 1980 Presidential Election.” Western Political Quarterly 36 (1): 134–48. Available at www.jstor.org/stable/447849.
Sachs, Jeffrey. 2019. “Community and Campus: Viewpoint Diversity and Community Partisanship.” New York: Heterodox Academy. Available at https://heterodoxacademy.org/viewpoint-diversity-community-partisanship.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Champlin, Alan J.. 2017. “The Attitudinal Model.” In Routledge Handbook of Judicial Politics, ed. Howard, Robert M. and Randazzo, Kirk A.. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Turner, Henry A., and Hetrick, Carl C.. 1972. “Professions and the Ballot Box: A Comparison of Nine Academic Groups and the General Electorate.” Social Science Quarterly 53 (3): 563–72. Available at www.jstor.org/stable/42860234.
Turner, Henry A., McClintock, Charles G., and Spaulding, Charles B.. 1963. “The Political Party Affiliation of American Political Scientists.” Western Political Quarterly 16 (3): 650–65. Available at www.jstor.org/stable/444768.
Waldman, Paul. 2019. “The Media Is Badly Botching the Medicare-for-all Debate.” Washington Post, March 4. Available at www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/01/30/media-is-badly-botching-medicare-all-debate.
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Oakland: University of California Press.
Wilson, Matthew. 2019. “The Nature and Consequences of Ideological Hegemony in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): this issue.
Yates, Jeff, Cann, Damon M., and Boyea, Brent D.. 2013. “Judicial Ideology and the Selection of Disputes for US Supreme Court Adjudication.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10 (4): 847–65. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12030.
Zigerell, L. J. 2019. “Left Unchecked: Political Hegemony in Political Science and the Flaws It Can Cause.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): this issue.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed