Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Long Lines, Voting Machine Availability, and Turnout: The Case of Franklin County, Ohio in the 2004 Presidential Election

  • Benjamin Highton (a1)
Extract

Within polling places, does the scarcity of voting machines cause longer lines and thereby dissuade some people from voting? Are voting machines scarce in some areas because turnout would be low, irrespective of the availability of voting machines? In Ohio in the aftermath of the 2004 presidential election, the answers to these questions carried very real and significant political stakes. Consider the following from Franklin County, the second most populous county in the state. In precincts where voting machines were plentiful (i.e., where there were fewer registrants per available voting machine), turnout was especially high and John Kerry's share of the presidential vote was low. In contrast, in areas of machine scarcity (i.e., precincts with many registrants per available voting machine), turnout was lower and Kerry's vote share was higher. These relationships are shown in Figures 1A and 1B. Given the strong association between machine availability and the Kerry vote, if machine (un)availability was a cause of (low) turnout, then Kerry may very well have received fewer votes than he would have had more machines been available or had the distribution of available machines been less skewed toward precincts that were more supportive of George W. Bush.I appreciate input from SSRC Commission members Henry Brady, Martha Kropf, Walter R. Mebane, Jr., and Michael Traugott with whom I collaborated on the SSRC's “Interim Report on Alleged Irregularities in the United States Presidential Election of 2 November 2004” (Brady et al. 2004). I also thank Benjamin Bishin for comments on the paper. The Social Science Research Council and its staff, including Jason McNichol, Dashiell Flynn, and Sarah Alexander, provided generous support for this work. The views expressed in this paper are not necessarily shared by other SSRC Commission members or the Social Science Research Council.

Copyright
References
Hide All

References

Brady, Henry E., Guy-Uriel Charles, Benjamin Highton, Martha Kropf, Walter R. Mebane Jr., and Michael Traugott. 2004. “Interim Report on Alleged Irregularities in the United States Presidential Election of 2 November 2004.” Social Science Research Council. http://elections.ssrc.org/commission/research/InterimReport122204.pdf, accessed on 3/15/05.
Congressional Record. 2005. January 6.
Dao, James, Ford Fessenden, and Tom Zeller Jr. 2004. “Voting Problems in Ohio Spur Call for Overhaul,” New York Times, December 24.
House Judiciary Democratic Staff. 2005. “Preserving Democracy: What Went Wrong in Ohio.” January 5. www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/ohiostatusrept1505.pdf, accessed on 3/15/05.
Jackson, Robert A. 1996. “A Reassessment of Voter Mobilization.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (June): 331349.
Knapp, Joe. 2004. “Effect of Voting-Machine Allocations on the 2004 Election—Franklin County, Ohio.” http://copperas.com/machinery/, accessed on 12/15/2004.
Powell, Michael, and Peter Slevin. 2004. “Several Factors Contributed to ‘Lost’ Voters in Ohio,” Washington Post, December 15.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed