Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Mini-Games for Teaching Political Science Methodology

  • Victor Asal (a1), Nakissa Jahanbani (a1), Donnett Lee (a1) and Jiacheng Ren (a1)
Abstract

Students often find lectures on political science methodology difficult to grasp. Based on our success of simulations and games in teaching various political science theories, we created several mini-games to help students gain exposure in engaging ways with aspects of quantitative and qualitative methodology. We use techniques in which students learn through “gimmicks” (Schacht and Stewart 1990; 1992), for which they are the data points that they are studying. We believe that drawing conclusions based on what students do and think empowers them to better understand the sometimes tricky elements of political science methods. Each of the three games described in this article required little to no preparation time. We have used these mini-games in several courses and have received positive feedback from students about their utility. Thus, we are sharing them for more general use.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Mini-Games for Teaching Political Science Methodology
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Mini-Games for Teaching Political Science Methodology
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Mini-Games for Teaching Political Science Methodology
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Archer, Candace C., and Miller, Melissa K.. 2011. “Prioritizing Active Learning: An Exploration of Gateway Courses in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (2): 429–34.
Asal, Victor. 2005. “Playing Games with International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 6 (3): 359–73.
Asal, Victor, Fahrenkopf, Nolan, Jadoon, Amira, and Hwang, Injeong. 2017. “Prisoner’s at Midnight: Introducing Undergraduate Students to the Advantages and Disadvantages of Quantitative Analysis through a Simulation Exercise.” European Political Science Available at https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0115-x.
Asal, Victor, Sin, Steven, Fahrenkopf, Nolan, and She, Xiaoye. 2013. “The Comparative Politics Game Show: Using Games to Teach Comparative Politics Theories.” International Studies Perspectives 15 (3): 347–58.
Bean, John C. 2011. Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Brock, Kathy L., and Cameron, Beverly J.. 1999. “Enlivening Political Science Courses with Kolb’s Learning-Preference Model.” PS: Political Science & Politics 32 (2): 251–6.
Brown, George, and Atkins, Madeleine. 1988. Effective Teaching in Higher Education. London: Methuen.
Caraway, Teri L. 2004. “Inclusion and Democratization: Class, Gender, Race, and the Extension of Suffrage”. Comparative Politics 36 (4): 443460.
Caprioli, Mary. 2005. “Primed for Violence: The Role of Gender Inequality in Predicting Internal Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (2): 161–78.
Coffey, Daniel J., Miller, William J., and Feuerstein, Derek. 2011. “Classroom as Reality: Demonstrating Campaign Effects through Live Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 7: 1433.
Costin, Frank. 1972. “Lecturing versus Other Methods of Teaching: A Review of Research.” British Journal of Educational Technology 3 (1): 431.
DeNeve, Kristina M., and Heppner, Mary J.. 1997. “Role-Play Simulations: The Assessment of an Active-Learning Technique and Comparisons with Traditional Lectures.” Innovative Higher Education 21: 231–46.
Frederking, Brian. 2005. “Simulations and Student Learning.” Journal of Political Science Education 1: 385–93.
Garfield, Joan, and Ben-Zvi, Dani. 2007. “How Students Learn Statistics Revisited: A Current Review of Research on Teaching and Learning Statistics.” International Statistical Review 75 (3): 372–96.
Glazier, Rebecca A. 2011. “Running Simulations without Ruining Your Life: Simple Ways to Incorporate Active Learning into Your Teaching.” Journal of Political Science Education 7 (4): 375–93.
Hess, Frederick M. 1999. Bringing the Social Sciences Alive. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Jennings, M. Kent, Stoker, Laura, and Bowers, Jake. 2009. “Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 782–99.
Knight, Jennifer K., and Wood, William B.. 2005. “Teaching More by Lecturing Less.” Cell Biology Education 4 (4): 298310.
Krain, Matthew, and Shadle, Christina J.. 2006. “Starving for Knowledge: An Active-Learning Approach to Teaching about World Hunger.” International Studies Perspectives 7 (1): 5166.
Lammers, William J., and Murphy, John J.. 2002. “A Profile of Teaching Techniques Used in the University Classroom: A Descriptive Profile of a US Public University.” Active Learning in Higher Education 3 (1): 5467.
Lane, David M., and Tang, Zhihua. 2000. “Effectiveness of Simulation Training on Transfer of Statistical Concepts.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 22 (4): 383–96.
Lantis, Jeffrey S., Kuzma, Lynn M., and Boehrer, John (eds.). 2000. The New International Studies Classroom: Active Teaching, Active Learning. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Lim, Timothy C. 2010. Doing Comparative Politics: An Introduction to Approaches and Issues. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
McCarthy, J. Patrick, and Anderson, Liam. 2000. “Active-Learning Techniques versus Traditional Teaching Styles: Two Experiments from History and Political Science.” Innovative Higher Education 24 (4): 279–94.
Miller, Judith E., and Groccia, James E.. 1997. “Are Four Heads Better Than One? A Comparison of Cooperative and Traditional Teaching Formats in an Introductory Biology Course.” Innovative Higher Education 21: 253–73.
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., and Wilson, Vicki A.. 2003. “Statistics Anxiety: Nature, Etiology, Antecedents, Effects and Treatments: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.” Teaching in Higher Education 8 (2): 195209.
Palfrey, Thomas R., and Poole, Keith T.. 1987. “The Relationship between Information, Ideology, and Voting Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 511–30.
Paxton, Pamela. 2000. “Women’s Suffrage in the Measurement of Democracy: Problems of Operationalization.” Studies in Comparative International Development 35 (3): 92111.
Pettenger, Mary, West, Douglas, and Young, Niki. 2013. “Assessing the Impact of Role-Play Simulations on Learning in Canadian and US Classrooms.” International Studies Perspectives 15 (4): 491508.
Schacht, Steven, and Stewart, Brad J.. 1990. “What’s Funny about Statistics? A Technique for Reducing Student Anxiety.” Teaching Sociology 18 (1): 5256.
Schacht, Steven, and Stewart, Brad J.. 1992. “Interactive/User-Friendly Gimmicks for Teaching Statistics.” Teaching Sociology 20 (4): 329–32.
Shaw, Carolyn M. 2004. “Using Role-Play Scenarios in the IR Classroom: An Examination of Exercises on Peacekeeping Operations and Foreign-Policy Decision Making.” International Studies Perspectives 5 (1): 122.
Shellman, Steven M., and Turan, Kürşad. 2003. “Acute Crisis in Cyprus: A Multilateral Bargaining Simulation.” Simulation & Gaming 34 (2): 281–91.
Slootmaeckers, Koen, Kerremans, Bart, and Adriaensen, Johan. 2013. “Too Afraid to Learn: Attitudes towards Statistics as a Barrier to Learning Statistics and to Acquiring Quantitative Skills.” Politics 34 (2): 191200.
Smith, Elizabeth T., and Boyer, Mark A.. 1996. “Designing In-Class Simulations”. PS: Political Science & Politics 29 (04): 690694.
Walker, J. D., Cotner, Sehoya H., Baepler, Paul M., and Decker, Mark D.. 2008. “A Delicate Balance: Integrating Active Learning into a Large Lecture Course.” CBE Life Sciences Education 7 (4): 361–7.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed