Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A New Model for Industry–Academic Partnerships

  • Gary King (a1) and Nathaniel Persily (a2)

Abstract

The mission of the social sciences is to understand and ameliorate society’s greatest challenges. The data held by private companies, collected for different purposes, hold vast potential to further this mission. Yet, because of consumer privacy, trade secrets, proprietary content, and political sensitivities, these datasets are often inaccessible to scholars. We propose a novel organizational model to address these problems. We also report on the first partnership under this model, to study the incendiary issues surrounding the impact of social media on elections and democracy: Facebook provides (privacy-preserving) data access; eight ideologically and substantively diverse charitable foundations provide initial funding; an organization of academics we created, Social Science One, leads the project; and the Institute for Quantitative Social Science at Harvard and the Social Science Research Council provide logistical help.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A New Model for Industry–Academic Partnerships
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A New Model for Industry–Academic Partnerships
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A New Model for Industry–Academic Partnerships
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Altman, Micah, and King, Gary. 2007. “A Proposed Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Quantitative Data.” D-Lib Magazine, 13. Available at http://j.mp/2ovSzoT.
Ankrah, Samuel, and Al-Tabbaa, Omar. 2015. “Universities–Industry Collaboration: A Systematic Review.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 31 (3): 387408.
Banaji, Mahzarin R., and Greenwald, Anthony G.. 2013. Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People . New York: Delacorte Press.
Chen, M. Keith, Chevalier, Judith A., Rossi, Peter E., and Oehlsen, Emily. 2017. The Value of Flexible Work: Evidence from Uber Drivers. National Bureau of Economic Research, No. W23296. Available at http://bit.ly/2HjgqPq.
Corzo, Janet, and Eastman, Perkins. 2015. “How Academic Institutions Partner with Private Industry.” R&D, April 20. Available at http://bit.ly/IndAc.
Dwork, Cynthia, McSherry, Frank, Nissim, Kobbi, and Smith, Adam. 2006. “Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis.” 2006. In Third Theory of Cryptography Conference, 265–84. New York, March 4–7.
Gaboardi, Marco, Honaker, James, King, Gary, Nissim, Kobbi, Ullman, Jonathan, and Vadhan, Salil. 2016. Working Paper: “PSI (Ψ): A Private Data-Sharing Interface.” Available at http://j.mp/2oSQ7F6.
Jasny, B. R., Wigginton, Nicholas, McNutt, Marcia, Bubela, Tania, Buck, S., Cook-Deegan, Robert, Gardner, T., et al. 2017. “Fostering Reproducibility in Industry–Academia Research.” Science 357 (6353): 759–61. Available at http://bit.ly/2Hezzlx.
King, Gary. 1995. “Replication, Replication.” PS: Political Science & Politics 28:444–52. Available at http://j.mp/2oSOXJL.
Koehler, Jonathan J. 1993. “The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 56 (1): 2855.
Lijphart, Arend. 2004. “Constitutional Design for Divided Societies.” Journal of Democracy 15 (2): 96109.
Perkmann, Markus, Tartari, Valentina, McKelvey, Maureen, Autio, Erkko, Broström, Anders, D’Este, Pablo, Fini, Riccardo, et al. 2013. “Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University–Industry Relations.” Research Policy 42 (2): 423–42.
Unger, Joseph M., Cook, Elise, Tai, Eric, and Bleyer, Archie. 2016. “Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies.” In American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting, Vol. 35, 185–98. NIH Public Access. Available at http://bit.ly/childcanc.
Voss, D. Stephen, Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1995. “Pre-Election Survey Methodology: Details from Nine Polling Organizations, 1988 and 1992.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59:98132. Available at http://j.mp/2n6au5o.
Wilson, Timothy D., and Brekke, Nancy. 1994. “Mental Contamination and Mental Correction: Unwanted Influences on Judgments and Evaluations.” Psychological Bulletin 116 (1): 117.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed