Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

On the Limits to Inequality in Representation

  • Stuart N. Soroka (a1) and Christopher Wlezien (a2)
Abstract

The correspondence between public preferences and public policy is a critical rationale for representative democratic government. This view has been put forward in the theoretical literature on democracy and representation (e.g., Dahl 1971; Pitkin 1967; Birch 1971) and in “functional” theories of democratic politics (Easton 1965; Deutsch 1963), both of which emphasize the importance of popular control of policymaking institutions. Political science research also shows a good amount of correspondence between opinion and policy, though to varying degrees, across a range of policy domains and political institutions in the U.S. and elsewhere. This is of obvious significance.Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 2006 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, at the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties specialist group, Nottingham, England, and at the 2007 National Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. We thank Vinod Menon for assistance with data collection and Kevin Arceneaux, Suzie DeBoef, Harold Clarke, Peter Enns, Mark Franklin, Martin Gilens, John Griffin, Will Jennings, Rich Joslyn, Benjamin Page, David Sanders, David Weakliem, John Zaller, and the anonymous reviewers for comments.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Brooks, Clem, and JeffManza. 2006. “Social Policy Responsiveness in Advanced Democracies.” American Sociological Review71: 47494.

Brooks, J. E.1987. “The Opinion-Policy Nexus in France: Do Institutions and Ideology Make a Difference?Journal of Politics49: 46580.

Burstein, Paul. 1998. “Bringing the Public Back in.” Social Forces77: 2762.

Converse, Philip. 1962. “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly26: 57899.

Edelman, Murray. 1985. “Political Language and Political Reality.” PS: Political Science and Politics18 (1): 109.

Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly69: 77896.

Griffin, John D., and BrianNewman. 2005. “Are Voters Better Represented?Journal of Politics67: 120627.

Hill, Kim Quaile, and Patricia A.Hurley. 1998. “Dyadic Representation Reappraised.” American Journal of Political Science43: 10937.

Hobolt, Sara B., and RobertKlemmensen. 2005. “Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Preferences in Britain and Denmark.” Political Studies53: 379402.

Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Benjamin I.Page. 2005. “Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?American Political Science Review99: 10723.

McCrone, Donald J., and James H.Kuklinski. 1979. “The Delegate Theory of Representation.” American Journal of Political Science23: 278300.

Miller, Warren E., and Donald E.Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review57: 4556.

Petry, F.1999. “The Opinion-Policy Relationship in Canada.” Journal of Politics61: 54050.

Schumaker, Paul D., and Russell W.Getter. 1977. “Responsiveness Bias in 51 American Communities.” American Journal of Political Science21 (42): 24781.

Soroka, Stuart N., and Christopher Wlezien. 2004. “Opinion Representation and Policy Feedback: Canada in Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37: 53159.

Soroka, Stuart N., and ChristopherWlezien. 2005. “Opinion-Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom.” British Journal of Political Science35: 66589.

Stimson, James A., Michael B.MacKuen, and Robert S.Erikson. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review89: 54365.

Weakliem, David. 2003. “Public Opinion Research and Political Sociology.” Research in Political Sociology12: 4980.

Weaver, R. Kent, Robert Y.Shapiro, and Lawrence R.Jacobs. 1995. “Trends: Welfare.” Public Opinion Quarterly59: 60627.

Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science39: 9811000.

Wlezien, Christopher. 1996. “Dynamics of Representation: The Case of U.S. Spending on Defense.” British Journal of Political Science26: 81103.

Wlezien, Christopher. 2004. “Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy.” Journal of Politics66: 124.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 77 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 236 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.