Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Polarizing Effect of the March for Science on Attitudes toward Scientists

  • Matthew Motta (a1)

Americans’ attitudes toward scientists have become more negative in recent years. Although researchers have considered several individual-level factors that might explain this change, little attention has been given to the political actions of scientists themselves. This article considers how March for Science rallies that took place across the United States in late April 2017 influenced Americans’ attitudes toward scientists and the research they produce. An online panel study surveying respondents three days before and two days after the March found that liberals’ and conservatives’ attitudes toward scientists polarized following the March. Liberals’ attitudes toward scientists became more positive whereas conservatives’ attitudes became more negative. However, the March appears to have had little effect on the public’s attitudes about scientific research. In addition to answering questions about the March’s political impact, this research calls attention to the possibility that the political actions of scientists can shape public opinion about them.

Hide All
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rodden, Jonathan, and Snyder, James M.. 2008. “The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 102 (2): 215–32.
Ashenfelter, Orley, and Card, David. 1985. “Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Estimate the Effect of Training Programs.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (4): 648–60.
Bafumi, Joseph, and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” Journal of Politics 71 (1): 124.
Blank, Joshua M., and Shaw, Daron. 2015. “Does Partisanship Shape Attitudes Toward Science and Public Policy? The Case for Ideology and Religion.” ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658 (1): 1835.
Bolsen, Toby, and Druckman, James N.. 2015. “Counteracting the Politicization of Science.” Journal of Communication 65 (5): 745–69.
Bolsen, Toby, Druckman, James N., and Cook, Fay L.. 2015. “Citizens, Scientists, and Policy Advisors Beliefs about Global Warming.” ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658 (1): 271–95.
Brulle, Robert J. 2018. “Critical Reflections on the March for Science.” Sociological Forum 33: 255–8.
Clifford, Scott, Jewell, Ryan M., and Waggoner, Phillip D.. 2015. “Are Samples Drawn from Mechanical Turk Valid for Research on Political Ideology?” Research & Politics 2 (4): 19.
Cofnas, Nathan, Carl, Noah, and Woodley of Menie, Michael A.. 2017. “Does Activism in Social Science Explain Conservatives’ Distrust of Scientists?” The American Sociologist 49 (1): 114.
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 5779.
Gauchat, Gordon W. 2008. “A Test of Three Theories of Anti-Science Attitudes.” Sociological Focus 41 (4): 337–57.
Gauchat, Gordon W. 2012. “Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010.” American Sociological Review 77 (2): 167–87.
Gauchat, Gordon, O’Brien, Timothy, and Mirosa, Oriol. 2017. “The Legitimacy of Environmental Scientists in the Public Sphere.” Climatic Change 143 (3): 297306.
Gibson, Caitlin. 2017. “The March for Science was a Moment Made for Bill Nye.” Washington Post, April 23. Available at
Hofstadter, Richard. 1963. Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. New York: Vintage.
Imbens, Guido, and Wooldridge, Jeffrey. 2007. “Differences-in-Differences Estimation.” Unpublished manuscript, last modified Summer 2007. Available at
Kahan, Dan M., Peters, Ellen, Wittlin, Maggie, Slovic, Paul, Ouellette, Lisa Larrimore, Braman, Donald, and Mandel, Gregory. 2012. “The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks.” Nature Climate Change 2 (10): 732–5.
Levay, Kevin E., Freese, Jeremy, and Druckman, James N.. 2016. “The Demographic and Political Composition of Mechanical Turk Samples.” Sage Open 6 (1): 117.
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S.. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
March for Science. 2017. “About Us.” Available at
McCright, Arron M., Dentzman, Katherine, Charters, Meghan, and Dietz, Thomas. 2013. “The Influence of Political Ideology on Trust in Science.” Environmental Research Letters 8 (4): 19.
McCright, Arron M., Dunlap, Reily E., and Xiao, Chenyang. 2013. “Perceived Scientific Agreement and Support for Government Action on Climate Change in the USA.” Climatic Change 119 (2): 511–18.
Motta, Matthew. 2017. “The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the United States.” American Politics Research 46 (3): 465–98.
Mullin, Megan. 2017. “Will the March for Science Backfire by Politicizing Science? It Depends on This.” Washington Post, April 21. Available at
Mutz, Diana C. 2011. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nichols, Thomas. 2017. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nyhan, Brendan. 2017. “How Marching for Science Risks Politicizing It.” New York Times, May 2. Available at
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald Thomas. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Smith, Noah. 2017. “March for Science Was Important, Silly Signs Aside.” Bloomberg Science, April 27. Available at
Sturgis, Patrick, and Allum, Nick. 2004. “Science in Society: Reevaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes.” Public Understanding of Science 13 (2): 5574.
Tobias, Jimmy. 2017. “A Brief Survey of Trump’s Assault on Science.” Pacific Standard, July 24. Available at
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Motta supplementary material
Motta supplementary material 1

 PDF (137 KB)
137 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed