Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:28:40.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postmortems of the 2010 Midterm Election Forecasts: Forecasting House Seats from Generic Congressional Polls: A Post-Mortem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

Joseph Bafumi
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College
Robert S. Erikson
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Christopher Wlezien
Affiliation:
Temple University

Extract

Based on information available in July, we predicted that the Republicans would receive 52.9% of the total House vote and end up holding 229 seats, gaining control from the Democrats in the process (Bafumi, Erikson, and Wlezien 2010b). Our national vote forecast proved to be nearly correct, undershooting the actual Republican share (53.8%) by slightly less than one percentage point. Our seat forecast was a little less accurate. Although we did foresee the House changing hands, we did not predict such a large Republican windfall in seats—we forecast a “mere” swing of 50 seats, which was short of the actual outcome by about 13 seats. The Republican seat total of 242, however, was well within the 95% confidence interval (199 to 259).

Type
Spotlight
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bafumi, Joseph, Erikson, Robert S., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2010a. “Balancing, Generic Polls, and Midterm Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 72: 705–19.Google Scholar
Bafumi, Joseph, Erikson, Robert S., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2010b. “Forecasting House Seats from Generic Congressional Polls: The 2010 Midterm Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43 (4): 633–36.Google Scholar