Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T18:22:26.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prejudice and Tolerance in US Presidential Politics: Evidence from Eight List Experiments in 2008 and 2012

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2020

Edward G. Carmines
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Eric R. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Indiana University

Abstract

Using list experiments on the 2008 and 2012 Cooperative Campaign Analysis Project, we investigated whether respondents are more likely to vote against presidential candidates from marginalized groups. We show that conservative and Republican respondents are disinclined to support Muslim and gay candidates. However, neither Right- nor Left-leaning respondents are significantly opposed to female candidates. Surprisingly, we uncovered asymmetric prejudices toward Mormons and African Americans. In both 2008 and 2012, Republicans were far more uncomfortable with gay or Muslim candidates than with African American candidates (per se). However, Democrats in 2012 were deeply uncomfortable with Mormon candidates. These findings illustrate that prejudice in presidential politics is not confined to right-wing pathologies alone but is present on both sides of the partisan–ideological divide.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2018. The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ahlquist, John S. 2018. “List Experiment Design, Non-Strategic Respondent Error, and Item Count Technique Estimators.” Political Analysis 26 (1): 3453.Google Scholar
Benson, Brett V., Merolla, Jennifer L., and Geer, John G.. 2011. “Two Steps Forward, One Step Back? Bias in the 2008 Presidential Election.” Electoral Studies 30:607–20.Google Scholar
Blair, Graeme, Cooper, Jasper, Coppock, Alexander, and Humphreys, Macartan. 2019. “Declaring and Diagnosing Research Designs.” American Political Science Review 113 (3): 838–59.Google Scholar
Blair, Graeme, Cooper, Jasper, Coppock, Alexander, Humphreys, Macartan, and Fultz, Neal. 2018. “DeclareDesign.” Software package for R. Available at http://declaredesign.org.Google Scholar
Blair, Graeme, and Imai, Kosuke. 2010. list: Statistical Methods for the Item Count Technique and List Experiment. The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=list.Google Scholar
Blair, Graeme, and Imai, Kosuke. 2012. “Statistical Analysis of List Experiments.” Political Analysis 20:4777.Google Scholar
Bolce, Louis, and DeMaio, Gerald. 2008. “A Prejudice for the Thinking Classes: Media Exposure, Political Sophistication, and the Anti-Christian Fundamentalist.” American Politics Research 36 (2): 155–85.Google Scholar
Burden, Barry C., Ono, Yoshikuni, and Yamada, Masahiro. 2017. “Reassessing Public Support for a Female President.” Journal of Politics 79 (3): 1073–78.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E., Green, John C., and Monson, J. Quin. 2012. “The Stained-Glass Ceiling: Social Contact and Mitt Romney’s ‘Religion Problem.’” Political Behavior 34:277–99.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E., Green, John C., and Monson, J. Quin. 2014. Seeking the Promised Land: Mormons and American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Choirat, Christine, Gandrud, Christopher, Honaker, James, Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Lau, Olivia. 2016. Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software. Version 5.0-15. Available at http://ZeligProject.org.Google Scholar
Conway, Lucian Gideon, Houck, Shannon C., Gornick, Laura Janelle, and Repke, Meredith A.. 2017. “Finding the Loch Ness Monster: Left-Wing Authoritarianism in the United States.” Political Psychology. Available at DOI:10.1111/pops.12470.Google Scholar
DeSante, Christopher D., and Smith, Candis Watts. 2020. Racial Stasis: The Millennial Generation and the Stagnation of Racial Attitudes in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. 2014. “Thinking of Doing a List Experiment? Here’s a List of Reasons Why You Should Think Again.” Available at http://andrewgelman.com/2014/04/23/thinking-list-experiment-heres-list-reasons-think. Accessed August 14, 2018.Google Scholar
Heerwig, Jennifer A., and McCabe, Brian J.. 2009. “Education and Social Desirability Bias: The Case of a Black Presidential Candidate.” Social Science Quarterly 90 (3): 674–86.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–31.Google Scholar
Kalkan, Kerem Ozan, Layman, Geoffrey C., and Uslaner, Eric M.. 2009. “‘Bands of Others’? Attitudes toward Muslims in Contemporary American Society.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 847–62.Google Scholar
Kane, James G., Craig, Stephen C., and Wald, Kenneth D.. 2004. “Religion and Presidential Politics in Florida: A List Experiment.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (2): 281–93.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Monson, J. Quin, and Patterson, Kelly D.. 2016. “Who’s In and Who’s Out: The Politics of Religious Norms.” Politics and Religion 9:508–36.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., Cobb, Michael D., and Gilens, Martin. 1997. “Racial Attitudes and the ‘New South.’Journal of Politics 59:323–49.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C. 2001. The Great Divide. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Martinez, Michael D. 2009. “Battleground Voters: Issues, Race, and Retrospections in Florida 2008.” Presented at the Southern Political Science Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, January 7–9.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miratrix, Luke W., Sekhon, Jasjeet S., Theodoridis, Alexander G., and Campos, Luis F.. 2018. “Worth Weighting? How to Think About and Use Weights in Survey Experiments.” Political Analysis 26 (3): 275–91.Google Scholar
Monson, J. Quin, and Riding, Scott. 2009. “Social Equality Norms for Race, Gender, and Religion in the American Public during the 2008 Presidential Primaries.” Paper presented at the Transformative Effect of 2008 Conference, Ohio State University, October 1–4.Google Scholar
Parker, Christopher S., and Barreto, Matt A.. 2013. Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., and Campbell, David E.. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Unites and Divides Us. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Team, R Development Core. 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, David P., Tolbert, Caroline J., and Franko, William. 2010. “Voters, Emotions, and Race in 2008: Obama as the First Black President.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (4): 875–89.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F., MacWilliams, Matthew, and Nteta, Tatishe. 2018. “Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism.” Political Science Quarterly 133 (1): 934.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Eric R., and Carmines, Edward G.. 2020. “Replication Data for ‘Prejudice and Tolerance in US Presidential Politics: Evidence from Eight List Experiments in 2008 and 2012.’” Available at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5UVZOS, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:zY+RNjMV3rE6jk3L5N7C5Q==.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Carmines, Edward G.. 1997. Reaching Beyond Race. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Stiglitz, Edward H.. 2012. The Reputational Premium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Streb, Matthew J., Burrell, Barbara, Frederick, Brian, and Genovese, Michael A.. 2008. “Social Desirability Effects and Support for a Female American President.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (1): 7689.Google Scholar
Tesler, Michael. 2016. Post-Racial or Most-Racial? Race and Politics in the Obama Era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Neuner, Fabian G., and Vandenbroek, L. Matthew. 2018. “The Changing Norms of Racial Political Rhetoric and the End of Racial Priming.” Journal of Politics 80 (3): 757–71.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Carmines and Schmidt Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Carmines and Schmidt supplementary material

Appendix

Download Carmines and Schmidt supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 420.1 KB