Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Ranking Doctoral Programs by Placement: A New Method

  • Benjamin M. Schmidt (a1) and Matthew M. Chingos (a2)

While many bemoan the increasingly large role rankings play in American higher education, their prominence and importance are indisputable. Such rankings have many different audiences, ranging from prospective undergraduates or graduate students, to foundations and government funders, to university administrators identifying strengths and weaknesses of their school. This diverse audience necessarily has varying hopes for what “quality” is measured in school rankings, and different uses for the rankings themselves. But although there are currently a wide variety of ways to assess graduate school quality, most existing surveys have recognized failings that compromise their usefulness to at least one of these different constituencies.The authors extend their thanks to William Bowen, Derek Bruff, Jonathan Cole, Philip Katz, Gary King, Robert Townsend, Harriet Zuckerman, and two anonymous PS reviewers for their valuable comments on and criticisms of earlier drafts of this paper.

Hide All
Cole, Jonathan R., and James A.Lipton. 1977. “The Reputations of American Medical Schools.” Social Forces55 (3): 66284.

Hix, Simon. 2004. “A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments.” Political Studies Review2: 293313.

Laband, David N.1986. “A Ranking of the Top U.S. Economics Departments by Research Productivity of Graduates.” Journal of Economic Education17 (1): 706.

McCormick, James M., and E. LeeBernick. 1982. “Graduate Training and Productivity: A Look at Who Publishes.” Journal of Politics44 (1): 21227.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 11 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 957 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.