Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Ready to Lead on Day One: Predicting Presidential Greatness from Political Experience

  • John Balz (a1)
Abstract

Presidential candidates frequently tout their political experience on the campaign trail, telling voters that it has prepared them to deal with complex problems, make weighty decisions, and show leadership. The value of that argument was put to the test in the 2008 presidential campaign by Hillary Clinton against her opponent, Barack Obama. This paper uses a multilevel model to analyze the value of national and state political experience on overall presidential greatness, as judged by seven surveys of academic experts. Overall, there is no evidence that political experience improves the likelihood of strong presidential performance, and even some weak evidence that political experience in certain political positions, most notably mayor and member of Congress, leads to poorer performance. In the end, great presidents are not great simply because they have spent their lives in politics and learned important lessons. Other personal and historical factors are likely to be more important.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Baker, Peter, and DeYoung, Karen. 2008. “Clinton's Experience is Debated.” Washington Post, March 21.
Crockett, David. 2000. “The President as Opposition Leader.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 30: 245–74.
C-SPAN. 1999. “C-SPAN Survey of Presidential Leadership.” C-SPAN, March–December 1999. http://www.americanpresidents.org/survey/historians/overall.asp.
C-SPAN. 2009. “2009 Historians Presidential Survey.” C-SPAN, February 15. http://www.c-span.org/PresidentialSurvey/presidential-leadership-survey.aspx.
Greenstein, Fred I. 2000. The Presidential Difference: Leadership Style from FDR to Clinton. New York: Free Press.
Healy, Patrick. 2007. “The Resume Factor: Those 2 Terms as First Lady.” New York Times, December 27.
Jacobson, Gary. 1983. The Politics of Congressional Elections. New York: Little Brown and Company.
King, Gary. 1991. “Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage.” British Journal of Political Science 21: 119–28.
Lonnstrom, Douglas, and Thomas, Kelly II. 2003. “‘The Contemporary Presidency’: Rating the Presidents: A Tracking Study.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 33: 625–34.
New York Times. 2008. “Transcript of the Democratic Debate in Cleveland.” New York Times, February 26. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/26/us/politics/26text-debate.html?pagewanted=all.
Nicholas, Peter. 2007. “Crisscrossing Iowa, Clinton and Obama Argue Experience.” Los Angeles Times, November 20.
Noah, Timothy. 2008. “Hillary's ‘Experience’ Lie.” Slate, January 14. http://www.slate.com/id/2182073/.
Pfiffner, James. 2003. “Ranking the Presidents: Continuity and Volatility.” White House Studies 3 (1): 2334.
Polsby, Nelson. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62: 144–68.
Ridings, William Jr., and McIver, Stuart. 1997. Rating the Presidents: A Ranking of U.S. Leaders, from the Great and Honorable to the Dishonest and Incompetent. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press.
Schlesinger, Arthur Jr. 1997. “Rating the Presidents: Washington to Clinton.” Political Science Quarterly 112: 179–90.
Schlesinger, Arthur Sr. 1948. “Historians Rate the U. S. Presidents.” Life 1: 6574.
Skowronek, Stephen. 1997. The Politics Presidents Make. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Skowronek, Stephen. 2008. Presidential Leadership in Political Time: Reprise and Reappraisal. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Wall Street Journal. 2000. “Federalist Society—The Wall Street Journal Survey on Presidents.” Wall Street Journal, November 16. http://www.opinionjournal.com/hail/rankings.html.
Wall Street Journal. 2005. “Presidential Leadership: The Rankings.” Wall Street Journal, September 12. http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007243.
White, John Kenneth. 1990. “How Should Political Science Judge Ronald Reagan?Polity 22: 701–15.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed