Skip to main content Accessibility help

Regulating Redistricting

  • Michael P. McDonald (a1)

As 2010 nears, state governments are preparing for the decennial political ritual of equalizing legislative district population as revealed by the new census. If the past is a guide, legislatures will grind to a standstill as legislators wrestle with the politically charged task of redistricting. But where legislators, party leaders, staff, consultants, and lawyers spend considerable time, effort, and money on their obsession with district boundaries, political scientists come to mixed conclusions about redistricting's effect on electoral politics. About the only consensus reached is on the electoral effects of racial gerrymandering, where debate has shifted to its normative implications.

Hide All


Abramowitz, Alan I. 1983. “Partisan Redistricting and the 1982 Congressional Elections.” The Journal of Politics 45 (August): 76770.
Altman, Micah. 1998. “Traditional Districting Principles, Judicial Myths vs. Reality.” Social Science History 22 (2): 159200.
Altman, Micah, Karin Mac Donald, and Michael P. McDonald. 2005. “From Crayons to Computers: The Evolution of Computer Use in Redistricting.” Social Science Computing Review 23 (2): 33446.
Ayres, Q. Whitfield, and David Whiteman. 1984. “Congressional Reapportionment in the 1980s: Types and Determinants of Policy Outcomes.” Political Science Quarterly 99 (2): 30314.
Baker v. Carr. 1962. 369 U.S. 186.
Barabas, Jason, and Jennifer Jerit. 2004. “Redistricting Principles and Racial Representation.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4 (4): 41535.
Basehart, Harry, and John Comer. 1991. “Partisan and Incumbent Effects in State Legislative Redistricting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (February): 6579.
Born, Richard. 1985. “Partisan Intentions and Election Day Realities in the Congressional Redistricting Process.” The American Political Science Review 79 (June): 30519.
Brace, Kimball, Bernard Grofman, Lisa Handley, and Richard Niemi. 1988. “Minority Voting Equality: The 65 Percent Rule in Theory and Practice.” Law and Policy 10 (1): 4362.
Cain, Bruce E., and Janet C. Campagna. 1987. “Predicting Partisan Redistricting Disputes.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12 (2): 26574.
Cain, Bruce, Karin Mac Donald, and Iris Hui. 2006. “Competition and Redistricting in California: Lesson for Reform.” Berkeley, CA: Institute for Governmental Studies.
Cain, Bruce E., Karin Mac Donald, and Michael P. McDonald. 2005. “From Equality to Fairness: The Path of Political Reform Since Baker v. Carr.” In Party Lines: Competition, Partisanship and Congressional Redistricting, eds. Bruce Cain and Thomas Mann. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Cameron, Charles, David Epstein, and Sharyn O'Halloran. 1996. “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?American Political Science Review 90 (4): 794812.
Campagna, Janet, and Bernard Grofman. 1990. “Party Control and Partisan Bias in 1980s Congressional Redistricting.” Journal of Politics 52 (4): 124257.
Cox v. Larios. 2004. 124 S. Ct. 1503.
Cox, Adam B. 2006. “Designing Redistricting Institutions.” Election Law Journal 5 (4): 41224.
Cox, Adam B. 2004. “Partisan Fairness and Redistricting Politics.” New York University Law Review 70 (3): 751802.
Cox, Gary W., and Jonathan N. Katz. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erikson, Robert S. 1972. “Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections.” The American Political Science Review 66 (December) 123445.
Gaffney v. Cummings. 1973. 412 U.S. 735, 753.
Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1994a. “A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 51454.
Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1994b. “Enhancing Democracy through Legislative Redistricting.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 54159.
Grofman, Bernard, and Gary King. 2007. “The Future of Partisan Symmetry as a Judicial Test for Partisan Gerrymandering after LULAC v. Perry.” Election Law Journal 6 (1): 235.
Handley, Lisa. 2005. “Comparative Redistricting Practices.” Presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
Issacharoff, Samuel, and Pamela Karlan. 2004. “Where to Draw the Line? Judicial Review of Political Gerrymanders.” Pennsylvania Law Review 153 (1): 54178.
Johnson, Douglas, Elise Lampe, Justin Levitt, and Andrew Lee. 2005. “Restoring the Competitive Edge.” Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA: Rose Institute of State and Local Government.
Karcher v. Daggett. 1983. 462 U.S. 725.
League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. Perry. 2006. 126 S. Ct. 2594.
Levitt, Justin, and Michael P. McDonald. 2007. “Taking the ‘Re’ Out of Redistricting: State Constitutional Provisions on Redistricting Timing.” Georgetown Law Review 95 (4), forthcoming.
Lowenstein, Daniel, and Jonathan Steinberg. 1985. “The Quest for Legislative Districting in the Public Interest: Elusive or Illusory?UCLA Law Review 33 (1): 175.
Lublin, David. 1999. “Racial Redistricting and African-American Representation: A Critique of ‘Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?’American Political Science Review 93 (1): 1836.
McDonald, Laughlin. 1998. “Redistricting at the Millennium.” Southern Changes 20 (3): 810.
McDonald, Michael P. 2004. “Comparative United States Redistricting Institutions.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4 (4): 37195.
McDonald, Michael P. 2006. “Redistricting and Competitive Districts.” In The Marketplace of Democracy: Competition in American Elections, eds. Michael P. McDonald and John Samples. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
McDonald, Michael P., and John Samples. 2006. “The Marketplace of Democracy: Normative and Empirical Issues.” In The Marketplace of Democracy: Competition in American Elections, eds. Michael P. McDonald and John Samples. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Musgrove, Philip. 1977. The General Theory of Gerrymandering. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Niemi, Richard G., Bernard Grofman, Carl Carlucci, and Thomas Hofeller. 1990. “Measuring Compactness and the Role of a Compactness Standard in a Test for Partisan and Racial GerrymanderingJournal of Politics 52 (4): 115581.
Niemi, Richard G., and Laura R. Winsky. 1992. “The Persistence of Partisan Redistricting Effects in Congressional Elections in the 1970s and 1980s.” Journal of Politics 54 (2): 56572.
Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting, et al. v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. 2003. CV2002-004380.
Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Gonzales (1:06-cv-1384).
O'Lear v. Miller. 2002. No. 01-72584-DT (E.D. Mich. May 24.)
Parker, Frank R. 1990. Black Votes Count. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Polsby, Daniel D., and Robert D. Popper. 1993. “Ugly: An Inquiry into the Problem of Racial Gerrymandering under the Voting Rights Act.” Michigan Law Review 92 (3): 65282.
Reynolds v. Sims. 1964. 377 U.S. 533.
Schrange v. Illinois Board of Elections. 1981. 88 Ill. 2d 87, 95.
Shaw v. Reno. 1993. 509 U.S. 630.
Smith v. Idaho Commission on Redistricting. 2001. 38 P.3d 121 (Idaho).
Swain, Carol M. 1995. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vieth v. Pennsylvania. 2002. 195 F. Supp. 2d 672 (MD Pa.).
Thernstrom, Abigail. 1987. Whose Votes Count? Affirmative Action and Minority Voting Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
White, John P., and Norman C. Thomas. 1964. “Urban and Rural Representation and State Legislative Apportionment.” Western Political Quarterly 17 (4): 72441.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed