Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe

  • Malu A. C. Gatto (a1), Anita R. Gohdes (a2), Denise Traber (a3) and Mariken A. C. G. van der Velden (a4)

Abstract

Studies investigating gender gaps in the doctoral training of political science students have focused so far overwhelmingly on the US context. Although important research within this context has made strides in identifying the persistent challenges to women’s incorporation in political methodology, much remains unknown about whether women and men have different experiences in methods training during their PhD programs. We contribute to this debate by analyzing data from an original survey on the methods-training experiences of political science PhD students at different European universities. We assess whether gender gaps exist with respect to PhD students’ methods training and confidence in employing methods skills. Our findings show that women cover significantly fewer methods courses in their doctoral training. When women do participate in methods training, they show levels of method employment similar to their male colleagues. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of European doctoral training.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Barnes, Tiffany D. 2018. “Strategies for Improving Gender Diversity in the Methods Community: Insights from Political Methodologists and Social Science Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 580–87. Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000513.
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Beaulieu, Emily. 2017. “Engaging Women: Addressing the Gender Gap in Women’s Networking and Productivity.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (2): 461–66. Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516003000.
Barnes, Tiffany D., Beaulieu, Emily, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2014. “An Assessment of the Visions in Methodology Initiative: Directions for Increasing Women’s Participation.” Political Methodologist 21 (2): 1016.
Blau, Francine D., Currie, Janet M., Croson, Rachel T., and Ginther, Donna K.. 2010. “Can Mentoring Help Female Assistant Professors? Interim Results from a Randomized Trial.” American Economic Review 100 (2): 348–52.
Dion, Michelle L. 2014. “An Effort to Increase Women’s Participation: The Visions in Methodology Initiative.” Political Methodologist 21 (2): 68.
Dion, Michelle L., Sumner, Jane Lawrence, and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2018. “Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields.” Political Analysis 26 (3): 312–27. Available at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/R7AQT1.
Esarey, Justin. 2018. “What Makes Someone a Political Methodologist?PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 588–96. Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000525.
Gutierrez y Muhs, Gabriella, Niemann, Yolanda Flores, Gonzalez, Carmen G., and Harris, Angela P.. 2012. Presumed Incompetent: The Intersections of Race and Class for Women in Academia Introduction. Logan: Utah State University Press. Available at https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2014.0006.
Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia, Glynn, Carroll J., and Huge, Michael. 2013. “The Matilda Effect in Science Communication: An Experiment on Gender Bias in Publication Quality Perceptions and Collaboration Interest.” Science Communication 35 (5): 603–25. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012472684.
Leeper, Thomas J. 2018. “Am I a Methodologist? (Asking for a Friend).” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 602–6. Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000549.
Maliniak, Daniel, Powers, Ryan, and Walter, Barbara F.. 2013. “The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations.” International Organization 67 (4): 889922. Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000209.
Morrow-Jones, Hazel, and Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M.. 2014. “Implicit Bias and Why It Matters to the Field of Political Methodology.” Political Methodologist 21 (2): 1620.
Mullen, Lincoln. 2018. “Predict Gender from Names Using Historical Data.” Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gender/vignettes/predicting-gender.html.
Puwar, Nirmal. 2004. Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies out of Place. New York: Berg Publishers. Available at http://research.gold.ac.uk/2017.
Shannon, Megan. 2014. “Barriers to Women’s Participation in Political Methodology: Graduate School and Beyond.” Political Methodologist 21 (2): 26.
Teele, Dawn Langan, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2017. “Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (2): 433–47. Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516002985.
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Gatto et al. supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (407 KB)
407 KB

Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe

  • Malu A. C. Gatto (a1), Anita R. Gohdes (a2), Denise Traber (a3) and Mariken A. C. G. van der Velden (a4)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed