Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-07T04:28:39.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Should We Make Political Science More of a Science orMore about Politics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2002

Rogers M. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

To paraphrase slightly, I have been asked to focus on the apparenttensions between making genuinely scientific contributions byadvancing knowledge in rigorous ways within specialized subfields,on the one hand, and addressing substantive political issues ofgeneral interest in accessible fashion, on the other. My view isthat, though we should try to do both things, we should givepriority to the latter—to helping both disciplinary and generalpublic understandings of important substantive political issuesbecome better informed and reasoned. To adopt this priority isstill, I believe, to pursue the main tasks of political science asscientifically as possible; but it is true that this course involvessignificant tradeoffs.

Information

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Copyright
© 2002 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

A modified version of these arguments appeared as Rogers M. Smith,“Putting the Substance Back in Political Science,” Chronicleof Higher Education Sec. 2: The Chronicle Review 48:B10–B11 (April 5, 2002).