Skip to main content
×
×
Home

South Korean Attitudes toward the ROK–U.S. Alliance: Group Analysis

  • Haesook Chae (a1)
Abstract

This article focuses on South Korean attitudes toward the South Korean-U.S. alliance by comparing three political groups. Using a nationwide survey of South Koreans conducted in 2007, it performs two quantitative analyses: cluster analysis to identify distinct political groups and regression analysis to test hypotheses drawn from literature about what influences public attitudes toward the alliance. This study draws four major conclusions about attitudes toward the alliance: (1) There is strong support for the alliance among South Koreans, including anti-American progressives. (2) For conservatives and centrists, the traditional rationale for the alliance—deterrence of North Korean aggression—remains a basic foundation for the alliance. (3) Among the three groups, there is a developing consensus on a new rationale for the alliance of promoting inter-Korean reconciliation. (4) The younger generation, which constitutes a large majority of the voting public, exhibits moderation and pragmatism in its ideological orientation, contradicting the commonly held view that it heavily slants progressive. These findings can offer important guidance for the future of the alliance.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Cha, Victor D. 2003. “America and South Korea: The Ambivalent Alliance?Current History 100: 279–84.
Cha, Victor D. 2005. “Anti-Americanism and the U.S. Role in Inter-Korean Relations.” In Korean Attitudes toward the United States, ed. Steinberg, David I., 116–38. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Chae, Haesook. 2005. “Understanding Anti-Americanism among South Korean College Students.” International Journal of Korean Studies 9 (1): 107–25.
Chae, Haesook, and Kim, Steven. 2007. “Not the South Korea We Thought We Knew.” Christian Science Monitor, August 13. http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0813/p09s02-coop.html?page=1.
Fackler, Martin. 2009. “South Koreans Express Fatigue with a Recalcitrant North.” New York Times, May 28. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/28/world/asia/28seoul.html.
Fackler, Martin, and Choe, Sang-Hun. 2009. “Modifying Conciliatory Stance, South Korea Pushes Back against the North.” New York Times, June 1.
Hahm, Chaibong. 2007. “South Korea's Progressives and the U.S.-ROK Alliance.” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies 17: 187201.
Kim, Myongsob, Parker, Suzanne L., and Choi, Jun Young. 2006. “Increasing Distrust of the USA in South Korea.” International Political Science Review 27 (4): 427–45.
Kim, Sunhyuk, and Lim, Wonhyuk. 2007. “How to Deal with South Korea.” Washington Quarterly 30 (2): 7182.
Korea Herald. 2009. “The Korean Model” [editorial]. Korea Herald, July 7. http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/NEWKHSITE/data/html_dir/2009/07/07/200907070051.asp.
Kuhn, Anthony. 2009. “South Korea Divided Over Response to North Korea.” Morning Edition, National Public Radio, June 9. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105143860.
Lee, Sook-Jong. 2008. “Korea's Domestic Base for Alliance with the United States.” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies 18: 2339.
Shin, Doh Chull, and Jhee, Byong-Keun. 2005. “How Does Democratic Regime Change Affect Mass Political Ideology? A Case Study of South Korea in Comparative Perspective.” International Political Science Review 26 (4): 381–96.
Shin, Gi-Wook, and Burke, Kristin C.. 2008. “North Korea and Contending South Korean Identities: Analysis of the South Korean Media; Policy Implications for the United States.” Academic Paper Series on Korea 1: 150–67.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed