Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T09:04:57.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Virtual Field Trips: Bringing College Students and Policymakers Together through Interactive Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier ,
J. Tobin Grant ,
Scott R. Meinke  and
Andrew R. Tomlinson
Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
J. Tobin Grant
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Scott R. Meinke
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Andrew R. Tomlinson
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 829 - 834
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2000

References

Agarwal, Rajshree, and Day, A. Edward. 1998. “The Impact of the Internet on Economic Education.” The Journal of Economic Education 29:99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, William D., and Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. 1999. “The Legislatures and Interest Groups Project.” Pekin, IL: Robert Michel Civic Education Grant Program, Dirksen Congressional Center.Google Scholar
Asher, Herbert B. 1973. “The Learning of Legislative Norms.” American Political Science Review 67:499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, E.K., and Cotlar, M. 1994. “Teaching Via the Internet.” Communication Education 43:184–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. 1998–1999. “Impact of Interactive Video Seminars: The Classroom on Capitol Hill Project.”Google Scholar
Brock, Kathy L., and Cameron, Beverly J. 1999. “Enlivening Political Science Courses with Kolb's Learning Preference Model.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32(June): 251–56.Google Scholar
Crawford, Sue E.S. 1998. “Internet Lite: Short Internet Assignments for American Government Courses.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31(September): 573–77.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Ronkowski, Shirley A. 1997. “Learning Styles of Political Science Students.” PS: Political Science and Politics 30(December): 732–36.Google Scholar
Frantzich, Stephen. 1995. Congressional Database Analysis Package. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: National Planning and Consulting Corporation.Google Scholar
Gangl, Amy. 1999. “The Impact of Expectations of Legislative Processes on Legitimacy Perceptions.” Ph.D. diss. proposal, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Donald L., and Sanchez, Peter M.. 1994. “Traditional versus Technology-Aided Instruction: The Effects of Visual Stimulus in the Classroom.” PS: Political Science and Politics 27(March): 64–67.Google Scholar
Kearsley, G., Lynch, W., and Wizer, D. 1995. “The Effectiveness and Impact of Online Learning in Graduate Education.” Educational Technology 35:37–42.Google Scholar
Kolb, D.A. 1985. Learning Style Inventory. Boston: McBer and Co. Google Scholar
Matthews, Donald R. [1968] 1973. U.S. Senators and Their World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. The Transformation of the U.S. Senate. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zack, M. 1995. “Using Electronic Messaging to Improve the Quality of Instruction.” Journal of Education for Business 70(March/April): 202–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar