Skip to main content
×
Home

When Winning Is Really Losing: Teaching Awards and Women Political Science Faculty

  • Charity Butcher (a1) and Timothy Kersey (a2)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Based on a recent survey of political science professors in the United States, women tend to win teaching awards at higher rates than their male counterparts. This may seem like good news for female faculty, particularly amid continuing reports of gender gaps in publications and citations as well as the “leaky pipeline” phenomenon within promotions. However, a closer look at these findings suggests that in cases in which such awards might be most beneficial to women, they are less likely than their male colleagues to receive such acknowledgments. In fact, women are more likely than men to receive these awards only in institutional contexts in which research output is more important for tenure and promotion than teaching. Thus, the achievement of teaching excellence may have an overall negative impact on the advancement of female faculty by reducing their time and focus available for research.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      When Winning Is Really Losing: Teaching Awards and Women Political Science Faculty
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      When Winning Is Really Losing: Teaching Awards and Women Political Science Faculty
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      When Winning Is Really Losing: Teaching Awards and Women Political Science Faculty
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Breuning Marijke, and Kathryn Sanders. 2007. “Gender and Journal Authorship in Eight Prestigious Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (2): 347–51.
Evans Heather K., and Bucy Erik P.. 2010. “The Representation of Women in Publication: An Analysis of Political Communication and the International Journal of Press/Politics.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43 (2): 295301.
Evans Heather K., and Moulder Ashley. 2011. “Reflecting on a Decade of Women’s Publications in Four Top Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44 (4): 793–98.
Fox Mary Frank. 1992. “Research, Teaching, and Publication Productivity: Mutuality versus Competition in Academia.” Sociology of Education 65 (4): 293305.
Hancock Kathleen J., Baum Matthew A., and Breuning Marijke. 2013. “Women and Pre-Tenure Scholarly Productivity in International Studies: An Investigation into the Leaky Career Pipeline.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 507–27.
Hesli Vicki, and Lee Jae Mook. 2011. “Faculty Research Productivity: Why Do Some of Our Colleagues Publish More than Others?PS: Political Science and Politics 44 (2): 393408.
Kadera Kelly M. 2013. “The Social Underpinnings of Women’s Worth in the Study of World Politics: Culture, Leader Emergence, and Coauthorship.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 463–75.
Kay Katty, and Claire Shipman. 2014. “The Confidence Gap.” The Atlantic. April 14. Available at http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/04/the-confidence-gap/359815.
Maliniak Daniel, Powers Ryan, and Walter Barbara F.. 2013. “The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations.” International Organization 67 (4): 134.
Mathews A. Lanethea, and Andersen Kristi. 2001. “A Gender Gap in Publishing? Women’s Representation in Edited Political Science Books.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (1): 143–47.
Mitchell Sara McLaughlin, Lange Samantha, and Brus Holly. 2013. “Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations Journals.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 485–92.
Monroe Kristen Renwick, and Chiu William F.. 2010. “Gender Equality in the Academy: The Pipeline Problem.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43 (2): 303–08.
Østby Gudrun, Strand Håvard, Nordås Ragnhild, and Gleditsch Nils Petter. 2013. “Gender Gap or Gender Bias in Peace Research? Publication Patterns and Citation Rates for Journal of Peace Research, 1983–2008.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 493506.
Park Shelley. 1996. “Research, Teaching, and Service: Why Shouldn’t Women’s Work Count?Journal of Higher Education 67 (1): 4684.
Sprague Joey, and Massoni Kelly. 2005. “Student Evaluations and Gendered Expectations: What We Can’t Count Can Hurt Us.” Sex Roles 53 (11/12): 779–93.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 41 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 139 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.