Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Who Decides When The Party Doesn’t? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump

  • Matthew C. MacWilliams (a1)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

While the party decides theory explains the outcomes of past nomination battles for president, this year in the Republican presidential contest party insiders failed to anoint a standard bearer. Who decides when the party elites don’t? In 2016, it was America’s authoritarian voters. And their candidate of choice, Donald Trump, is anathema to party leaders. I argue that Trump’s rise is in part the result of authoritarian voters’ response to his unvarnished, us-versus-them rhetoric. The failure of Republican Party insiders to coalesce behind one candidate opened the door for Trump. Authoritarian-driven partisan polarization (Hetherington and Weiler 2009), increasing fear of real and imagined threats, and terrorist incidents abroad and at home provided the fuel for Trump’s campaign. And Trump’s message and manner ignited that fuel, propelling him to the Republican nomination for president.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Who Decides When The Party Doesn’t? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Who Decides When The Party Doesn’t? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Who Decides When The Party Doesn’t? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Adorno Theodor, Frenkel-Brunswick Else, Levinson Daniel J., and Sanford Nevitt R.. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper and Row.
Altemeyer Robert. 2006. The Authoritarians. Online: theauthoritarians.com.
Altemeyer Robert. 1996. The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Altemeyer Robert. 1988. Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Altemeyer Robert. 1981. Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
Carmines Edward G. and Stimson James A.. 1990. Issues Evolution: Race and the Transformation of America Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carmines Edward G. and Stimson James A..1986. “The Structure and Sequence of Issue Evolution.” American Political Science Review 80: 901920.
Cohen Marty, Karol David, Noel Hans, and Zaller John. 2008. The Party Decides. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Duckitt John. 1989. “Authoritarianism and Group Identification: A New View of an Old Construct.” Political Psychology 10 (1): 6384.
Feldman Stanley. 2003. “Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 24 (1): 4174.
Feldman Stanley and Stenner Karen. 1997. “Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 18: 741–70.
Fischer David H. 1989. Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fromm Erich. 1941. Escape From Freedom. New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC.
Hetherington Marc and Suhay Elizabeth. 2011. “Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans’ Support for the War on Terror.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 546–60.
Hetherington Marc and Weiler Jonathan. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jost John T., Glaser Jack, Kruglanski Arie W., and Sulloway Frank J.. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition,” Psychological Bulletin 129: 339–75.
Lavine Howard, Lodge Milton, and Freitas Kate. 2005. “Threat, Authoritarianism, and Selective Exposure to Information.” Political Psychology 26: 219–44.
Lipset Seymour M. 1959. “Democracy and Working-Class Authoritarianism.” American Sociological Review 24 (4): 482501.
Stenner Karen. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2964
Total number of PDF views: 2256 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 3532 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 12th October 2016 - 16th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.