Skip to main content
×
Home

Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage

  • Adam R. Brown (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

In only 10 years, Wikipedia has risen from obscurity to become the dominant information source for an entire generation. However, any visitor can edit any page on Wikipedia, which hardly fosters confidence in its accuracy. In this article, I review thousands of Wikipedia articles about candidates, elections, and officeholders to assess both the accuracy and the thoroughness of Wikipedia's coverage. I find that Wikipedia is almost always accurate when a relevant article exists, but errors of omission are extremely frequent. These errors of omission follow a predictable pattern. Wikipedia's political coverage is often very good for recent or prominent topics but is lacking on older or more obscure topics.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Blumenstock Joshue E. 2008. “Size Matters: Word Count as a Measure of Quality on Wikipedia.” Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on the World Wide Web, Beijing, China, April 21–25.
Bragues George. 2007. “Wiki-Philosophizing in a Marketplace of Ideas: Evaluating Wikipedia's Entries on Seven Great Minds. Working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=978177.
Clauson Kevin A., Polen Hyla H., Boulos Maged N. Kamel, and Dzenowagis Joan H.. 2008. “Scope, Completeness, and Accuracy of Drug Information in Wikipedia.” Annals of Pharmacotherapy 42 (12): 1,814–21.
Cohen Noam. 2008. “Don't Like Palin's Wikipedia Story? Change It.” New York Times, August 31.
Devgan Lara, Powe Neil, Blakely Brittony, and Makary Martin. 2007. “Wiki-Surgery? Internal Validity of Wikipedia as a Medical and Surgical Reference.” Journal of the American College of Surgeons 205 (suppl): S76S77.
Giles Jim. 2005. “Special Report: Internet Encyclopedias Go Head to Head.” Nature 438:900–01.
Gralla Preston. 2009. “What Was Encarta? Look It Up on Wikipedia.” PC World, March 31. http://www.pcworld.com/article/162320/what_was_encarta_look_it_up_on_wikipedia.html.
McDougall Paul. 2009. “Microsoft Encarta is Web 2.0's Latest Victim.” InformationWeek, March 31. http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/web2.0/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216401974.
Meredith Marc. 2010. “Exploiting Friends and Neighbors: An Instrumental Variable Approach to Estimating Coattail Effects.” Paper presented at the 10th State Policy and Politics Conference, Springfield, Illinois, June 3–5.
Nicholson Daren T. 2006. “An Evaluation of the Quality of Consumer Health Information on Wikipedia.” Master's capstone, Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine.
Pender Michael, Lasserre Kaye, Kruesi Lisa, Del Mar Christopher, and Anaradha Satyamurthy. 2008. “Putting Wikipedia to the Test: A Case Study.” Paper presented at to the Special Libraries Association Annual Conference, Seattle, June 16.
Rainie Lee, and Tancer Bill. 2007. “Wikipedia Users.” Pew Internet, Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Wikipedia-users.aspx.
Rector Lucy Holman. 2008. “Comparison of Wikipedia and Other Encyclopedias for Accuracy, Breadth, and Depth in Historical Articles.” Reference Services Review 36 (1): 722.
Royal Cindy, and Kapila Deepina. 2009. “What's on Wikipedia and What's Not… ?Social Science Computer Review 27 (1): 138–48.
Time. 2007. “10 Questions: Jimmy Wales.” Time, March 21. http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1601491,00.html.
Young Jeff. 2006. “Wikipedia Founder Discourages Academic Use of His Creation.” Chronicle of Higher Education, June 12. http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/wikipedia-founder-discourages-academic-use-of-his-creation/2305.
Zaller John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 63 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 671 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.