Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Chemicals, cans and factories: how grade school children think about processed foods

  • Rachel Bleiweiss-Sande (a1), Jeanne Goldberg (a1), E Whitney Evans (a2), Ken Chui (a1), Caitlin Bailey (a1) and Jennifer Sacheck (a3)...

Abstract

Objective:

To determine how children interpret terms related to food processing; whether their categorisation of foods according to processing level is consistent with those used in research; and whether they associate the degree of processing with healthfulness.

Design:

Qualitative data were collected from ten focus groups. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted.

Setting:

Four elementary and afterschool programmes in a large, urban school district in the USA that served predominantly low-income, racial/ethnic minority students.

Participants:

Children, 9–12 years old, in the fourth–sixth grades (n 53).

Results:

The sample was 40 % male, 47 % Hispanic with a mean age of 10·4 ± 1·1 years. Children’s understanding of unprocessed foods was well aligned with research classifications, while concordance of highly processed foods with research categorisations varied. Five primary themes regarding the way children categorised foods according to their processing level emerged: type and amount of added ingredients; preparation method; packaging and storage; change in physical state or sensory experience; and growing method. Most children associated processing level with healthfulness, describing unprocessed foods as healthier. The most common reason provided for the unhealthfulness of processed foods was added ingredients, including ‘chemicals’ and ‘sugar’.

Conclusions:

The current study demonstrated that children have a working knowledge of processing that could be leveraged to encourage healthier eating patterns; however, their understanding is not always consistent with the classification systems used in research. The vocabulary used by researchers and consumers to talk about processing must be reconciled to translate findings into actionable messages.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Email rachel.bleiweiss_sande@tufts.edu

References

Hide All
1.Hales, C, Carroll, MD, Fryar, CDet al. (2017) Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS Data Brief 288.
2.Banfield, EC, Liu, Y, Davis, JSet al. (2016) Poor Adherence to US Dietary Guidelines for Children and Adolescents in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Population. J Acad Nutr Diet 116, 2127.
3.Mozaffarian, D & Ludwig, D. (2010) Dietary guidelines in the 21st century— A time for food. JAMA 304, 681682.
4.Monteiro, CA (2009) Nutrition and health. The issue is not food, nor nutrients, so much as processing. Public Health Nutr 12, 729731.
5.Fardet, A, Rock, E, Bassama, Jet al. (2015) Current food classifications in epidemiological studies do not enable solid nutritional recommendations for preventing diet-related chronic diseases: the impact of food processing. Adv Nutr 6, 629638.
6.Rowe, S, Alexander, N, Almeida, Net al. (2011) Food science challenge: Translating the dietary guidelines for Americans to bring about real behavior change. J Food Sci 76, R2937.
7.Ogden, CL, Lamb, MM, Carroll, MDet al. (2010) Obesity and socioeconomic status in children and adolescents: United States, 2005–2008. NCHS Data Brief 51.
8.Fahlman, MM, McCaughtry, N, Martin, Jet al. (2010) Racial and socioeconomic disparities in nutrition behaviors: Targeted interventions needed. J Nutr Educ Behav 42, 1016.
9.Frederick, CB, Snellman, K, Putnam, RD (2014) Increasing socioeconomic disparities in adolescent obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 13381342.
10.Wang, Y & Beydoun, MA (2007) The obesity epidemic in the United States--gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiol Rev 29, 628.
11.Poti, JM, Mendez, MA, Ng, SWet al. (2015) Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households? Am J Clin Nutr 101, 12511262.
12.Poti, JM, Mendez, MA, Ng, SWet al. (2016) Highly processed and ready-to-eat packaged food and beverage purchases differ by race/ethnicity among US households. J Nutr 146, 17221730.
13.Martinez Steele, E, Popkin, BM, Swinburn, Bet al. (2017) The share of ultra-processed foods and the overall nutritional quality of diets in the US: Evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. Popul Health Metr 15, 6.
14.Martinez Steele, E, Baraldi, LG, Louzada, MLet al. (2016) Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: Evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 6, e009892.
15.Eicher-Miller, HA, Fulgoni, VL & Keast, DR (2012) Contributions of processed foods to dietary intake in the US from 2003–2008: A report of the Food and Nutrition Science Solutions Joint Task Force of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, American Society for Nutrition, Institute of Food Technologists, and International Food Information Council. J Nutr 142, 2065S2072S.
16.Monteiro, C, Levy, R, Claro, Ret al. (2010) A new classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing. Cad Saúde Pública 26, 20392049.
17.Moubarac, JC, Parra, DC, Cannon, Get al. (2014) Food classification systems based on food processing: Significance and implications for policies and actions: A systematic literature review and assessment. Curr Obes Rep 3, 256272.
18.Poti, JM, Braga, B & Qin, B (2017) Ultra-processed food intake and obesity: What really matters for health-processing or nutrient content? Curr Obes Rep 6, 420431.
19.Moodie, R, Stuckler, D, Monteiro, Cet al. (2013) Profits and pandemics: Prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries. Lancet 381, 670679.
20.Poti, JM, Duffey, KJ & Popkin, BM (2014) The association of fast food consumption with poor dietary outcomes and obesity among children: Is it the fast food or the remainder of the diet? Am J Clin Nutr 99, 162171.
21.MacInnis, B & Rausser, G (2005) Does processing contribute to child obesity disparities? Amer J Agr Econ 87, 11541158.
22.Eicher-Miller, HA, Fulgoni, VL & Keast, DR (2015) Processed food contributions to energy and nutrient intake differ among US children by race/ethnicity. Nutrients 7, 1007610088.
23.Dwyer, JT, Fulgoni, VL 3rd, Clemens, RAet al. (2012) Is “processed” a four-letter word? The role of processed foods in achieving dietary guidelines and nutrient recommendations. Adv Nutr 3, 536548.
24.Malik, VS, Popkin, BM, Bray, GAet al. (2010) Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 33, 24772483.
25.Reedy, J & Krebs-Smith, SM (2010) Dietary sources of energy, solid fats, and added sugars among children and adolescents in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc 110, 14771484.
26.Malik, VS, Pan, A, Willett, WCet al. (2013) Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 98, 10841102.
27.Grimes, CA, Riddell, LJ, Campbell, KJet al. (2013) Dietary salt intake, sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, and obesity risk. Pediatrics 131, 1421.
28.Zanovec, M, O’Neil, CE, Cho, SSet al. (2010) Relationship between whole grain and fiber consumption and body weight measures among 6- to 18-year-olds. J Pediatr 157, 578583.
29.Ambrosini, GL (2014) Childhood dietary patterns and later obesity: A review of the evidence. Proc Nutr Soc 73, 137146.
30.Elliott, C (2010) Eatertainment and the (Re)classification of children’s foods. Food Cult Soc Int J Multidiscip Res 13, 539553.
31.Elliott, C (2011) “It’s junk food and chicken nuggets”: Children’s perspectives on ‘kids’ food’ and the question of food classification. J Consum Behav 10, 133140.
32.Cornwell, TB, McAlister, AR & Polmear-Swendris, N (2014) Children’s knowledge of packaged and fast food brands and their BMI. Why the relationship matters for policy makers. Appetite 81, 277283.
33.Slining, MM, Mathias, KC & Popkin, BM (2013) Trends in food and beverage sources among US children and adolescents: 1989–2010. J Acad Nutr Diet 113, 16831694.
34.Heary, C & Hennessy, E (2002) The use of focus group interviews in pediatric health care research. J Pediatr Psych 27, 4757.
35.Morgan, M, Gibbs, S, Maxwell, Ket al. (2002) Hearing children’s voices: Methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children aged 7–11 years. Qual Res 2, 520.
36.Gibson, JE (2012) Interviews and focus groups with children: Methods that match children’s developing competencies. J Family Theory Rev 4, 148159.
37.Scott, J (2008) Children as respondents: The challenge for quantitative methods. In Research with Children, pp. 87108 [Christensen, P. and James, A., editors]. London, England: Falmer Press.
38.Patton, MQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
39.Patton, M (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications Inc.
40.Hubbard, KL, Must, A, Eliasziw, Met al. (2014) What’s in children’s backpacks: Foods brought from home. J Acad Nutr Diet 114, 14241431.
41.Braun, V & Clarke, V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3, 77101.
42.Desjardins, E (2013) “Making Something Out of Nothing”: Food Literacy Among Youth, Young Pregnant Women and Young Parents who are at Risk for Poor Health. Ontario, Canada: Public Health Ontario.
43.Murimi, MW, Moyeda-Carabaza, AF, Nguyen, Bet al. (2018) Factors that contribute to effective nutrition education interventions in children: A systematic review. Nutr Rev 76, 553580.
44.Monteiro, CA, Moubarac, JC, Cannon, Get al. (2013) Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system. Obes Rev 14, Suppl. 2, 2128.
45.Popkin, B (2006) Global nutrition dynamics: The world is shifting rapidly toward a diet linked with noncommunicable diseases. Am J Clin Nutr 84, 289298.

Keywords

Chemicals, cans and factories: how grade school children think about processed foods

  • Rachel Bleiweiss-Sande (a1), Jeanne Goldberg (a1), E Whitney Evans (a2), Ken Chui (a1), Caitlin Bailey (a1) and Jennifer Sacheck (a3)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.