Skip to main content
×
Home

The cognitive contexts of beliefs about the healthiness of meat

  • Emma Lea (a1) and Anthony Worsley (a2)
Abstract
AbstractObjective:

The overall aim of this study was to examine a variety of belief and demographic factors that are associated with the perception that meat is intrinsically unhealthy.

Design:

State-wide survey (written questionnaire) that included questions on meat and nutrition beliefs, perceived barriers and benefits of vegetarian diets, personal values, number of vegetarian friends and family members, and use and trust of health/nutrition/food information sources.

Setting:

South Australia.

Subjects:

Six hundred and one randomly selected South Australians and 106 non-randomly selected vegetarians and semi-vegetarians.

Results:

For all respondents considered as a group, the most important predictors of the belief that meat is intrinsically unhealthy were the perceived benefits of vegetarian diets (all positive predictors). These included: (1) the perceived links between vegetarianism, peace and increased contentment; (2) animal welfare and environmental benefits; and (3) health benefits. There were differences between different dietary groups however. For non-vegetarians, social concerns about vegetarianism (positive) were most important, followed by health and non-health benefits (positive) of vegetarianism. Red meat appreciation was the strongest (positive) predictor for vegetarians, with health benefits of vegetarianism (positive) and education (negative predictor) also important.

Conclusions:

The implications of the findings for health and other issues are discussed. Judgements about the healthiness of meat are likely to be related to moral and environmental beliefs and, for non-vegetarians, to social concerns about vegetarianism, in addition to health beliefs. These need to be considered if any attempts are made to influence meat consumption.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The cognitive contexts of beliefs about the healthiness of meat
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The cognitive contexts of beliefs about the healthiness of meat
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The cognitive contexts of beliefs about the healthiness of meat
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email emma_lea@hotmail.com
References
Hide All
1Sanders TAB. The nutritional adequacy of plant-based diets. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1999; 58: 265–9.
2National Health and Medical Research Council. Dietary Guidelines for Australians. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1992.
3US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010 – Conference Edition. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2000.
4World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research, 1997.
5American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: vegetarian diets. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1997; 97(11): 1317–21.
6Bingham SA. High-meat diets and cancer risk. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1999; 58: 243–8.
7Key TJ, Davey GK, Appleby PN. Health benefits of a vegetarian diet. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1999; 58: 271–5.
8Key TJ, Fraser GE, Thorogood M, Appleby PN, Beral V, et al. Mortality in vegetarians and nonvegetarians: detailed findings from a collaborative analysis of 5 prospective studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 70(Suppl.): 516S–24S.
9Appleby PN, Thorogood M, Mann JI, Key TJA. The Oxford Vegetarian Study: an overview. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 70(Suppl.): 525S–31S.
10Mann JI. Optimizing the plant-based diet. Asia Pacific J. Clin. Nutr. 2000; 9(Suppl. 1): 60S–4S.
11Dwyer JT. Nutritional consequences of vegetarianism. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1991; 11: 6191.
12Alexander D, Ball MJ, Mann J. Nutrient intake and haematological status of vegetarians and age–sex matched omnivores. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994; 48: 538–46.
13Dwyer JT. Health aspects of vegetarian diets. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1988; 48: 712–38.
14Fieldhouse P. Food and Nutrition: Customs and Culture. London: Croom Helm, 1986.
15Lewis S. An opinion on the global impact of meat consumption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994; 59(Suppl.): 1099S–102S.
16Pimentel D, Houser J, Preiss E, White O. Water resources: agriculture, the environment, and society. BioScience 1997; 47(2), 97106.
17Spedding CRW, Lewis B, Assmann G. The effect of dietary changes on agriculture. In Lewis B, Assmann G, eds. The Social and Economic Contexts of Coronary Prevention. London: Current Medical Literature, 1990.
18Sapp SG. Impact of nutritional knowledge within an expanded rational expectations model of beef consumption. J. Nutr. Educ. 1991; 23(5): 214–22.
19Lea E, Worsley A. Influences on meat consumption in Australia. Appetite 2001; 36(2): 127–36.
20Richardson NJ, Shepherd R, Elliman NA. Current attitudes and future influences on meat consumption in the UK. Appetite 1993; 21: 4151.
21Worsley A, Skrzypiec G. Do attitudes predict red meat consumption among young people? Ecol. Food Nutr. 1998; 37: 163–95.
22Cox DN, Anderson AS, Lean MEJ, Mela DJ. UK consumer attitudes, beliefs and barriers to increasing fruit and vegetable consumption. Public Health Nutr. 1998; 1(1): 61–8.
23Lappalainen R, Saba A, Holm L, Mykkanen H, Gibney MJ. Difficulties in trying to eat healthier: descriptive analysis of perceived barriers for healthy eating. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51(Suppl. 2): 36S40S.
24Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ. Monographs 1974; 2(4): 328–35.
25Wolinsky FD. The Sociology of Health: Principles, Professions and Issues. Boston, MA: Little/Brown, 1980.
26McIntosh WA, Kubena KS, Jiang H, Usery CP, Karnei K. An application of the Health Belief Model to reductions in fat and cholesterol intake. J. Wellness Perspectives 1996; 12(2): 98107.
27Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. Washington, DC: John Wiley and Sons, 1978.
28Fiddes N. Meat: A Natural Symbol. London: Routledge, 1991.
29Freeland-Graves J, Greninger SA, Graves GR, Young RK. Health practices, attitudes, and beliefs of vegetarians and nonvegetarians. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1986; 86(7): 913–8.
30McIntosh WA, Fletcher RD, Kubena KS, Landmann WA. Factors associated with sources of influence/information in reducing red meat by elderly subjects. Appetite 1995; 24: 219–30.
31Schwartz SH. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1992; 25: 165.
32Worsley A, Baghurst K, Skrzypiec G. Meat Consumption and Young People. CSIRO Final Report to the Meat Research Corporation. Adelaide: CSIRO, 1995.
33Kearney M, Gibney MJ, Martinez JA, de Almeida MDV, Friebe D, et al. Perceived need to alter eating habits among representative samples of adults from all member states of the European Union. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51(Suppl. 2): 30S–5S.
34Worsley A, Scott V. Consumers' concerns about food and health in Australia and New Zealand. Asia Pacific J. Clin. Nutr. 2000; 9(1): 2432.
35Australian Bureau of Statistics. Basic Community Profile software. 1996 Census of Population and Housing. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996.
36Worsley A, Skrzypiec G. Teenager's social attitudes and red meat consumption. Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand. Miscellaneous Series 36. Wellington: Royal Society of New Zealand, 1996.
37 Vegetarian Society UK. Summary of RealEat polls 1984–1999 [Online]. Available at http://www.vegsoc.org/info/realeat.html. 2001.
38Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Nutrition Survey Selected Highlights Australia 1995. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1997.
39 Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australia Now – A Statistical Profile: Health [Online] Available at http://www.abs.gov.au/. 2000.
40Holm L, Møhl M. The role of meat in everyday food culture: an analysis of an interview study in Copenhagen. Appetite 2000; 34: 277–83.
41Frey D. Recent research on selective exposure to information. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1986; 19: 4180.
42Heider F. Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychol. Rev. 1944; 51: 358–74.
43Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957.
44Parmenter K, Waller J, Wardle J. Demographic variation in nutrition knowledge in England. Health Educ. Res. 2000; 15(2): 163–74.
45Variyam JN, Blaylock J, Smallwood DM. Modelling nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and diet–disease awareness: the case of dietary fibre. Stat. Med. 1996; 15(1): 2335.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 410 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 975 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.