1US National Cancer Institute. Dietary Assessment Calibration/Validation Register: Studies and Their Associated Publications http://www-dacv.ims.nci.nih.gov/. Accessed 27 June 2006.
2Tjønneland, A, Overvad, K, Haraldsdottir, J, Bang, S, Ewertz, M, Jensen, OM. Validation of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire developed in Denmark. International Journal of Epidemiology 1991; 20: 906–12.
3Margetts, BM, Pietinen, P, . International Journal of Epidemiology 1997; 26(Suppl. 1): S1–161.
4Johansson, I, Hallmans, G, Wikman, Å, Biessy, C, Riboli, E, Kaaks, R. Validation and calibration of food-frequency questionnaire measurements in the Northern Sweden Health and Disease cohort. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 487–96.
5Lund, E, Kumle, M, Braaten, T, Hjartåker, A, Bakken, K, Eggen, E, et al. . External validity in a population-based national prospective study – the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC). Cancer Causes & Control 2003; 14: 1001–8.
7National Association for Nutrition and Health. Household Measures and Weights for Foods (in Norwegian). Otta: Engers boktrykkeri A/S, 1989.
8Slimani, N, Kaaks, R, Ferrari, P, Casagrande, C, Clavel-Chapelon, F, Lotze, G, et al. . European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study: rationale, design and population characteristics. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 1125–45.
9National Council for Nutrition and Physical Activity, Norwegian Food Control Authority, Institute for Nutrition Research, University of Oslo. The Big Food Composition Table. Oslo: Gyldendal, undervisning, 2001.
10Hjartåker, A, Lund, E, Bjerve, KS. Serum phospholipid fatty acid composition and habitual intake of marine foods registered by a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997; 51: 736–42.
11Parr, CL, Veierød, MB, Laake, P, Lund, E, Hjartåker, A. Test–retest reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and estimated effects on disease risk in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC). Nutrition Journal 2006; 5: 4.
12Brustad, M, Skeie, G, Braaten, T, Slimani, N, Lund, E. Comparison of telephone vs face-to-face interviews in the assessment of dietary intake by the 24h recall EPIC SOFT program - the Norwegian calibration study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003; 57: 107–13.
13Slimani, N. 24-Hour recalls as reference calibration measurements in EPIC: from a statistical theory to epidemiological application. , Wageningen University, Wageningen, 2002.
14Bland, JM, Altman, DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–10.
15Willett, WC, Sampson, L, Stampfer, MJ, Rosner, B, Bain, C, Witschi, J, et al. . Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. American Journal of Epidemiology 1985; 122: 51–65.
16Stram, DO, Hankin, JH, Wilkens, LR, Pike, MC, Monroe, KR, Park, S, et al. . Calibration of the dietary questionnaire for a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles. American Journal of Epidemiology 2000; 151: 358–70.
17Subar, AF, Thompson, FE, Kipnis, V, Midthune, D, Hurwitz, P, McNutt, S, et al. . Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaire. American Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 154: 1089–99.
18Bellach, B. Remarks on the use of Pearson's correlation coefficient and other association measures in assessing validity and reliability of dietary assessment methods. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1993; 47, (Suppl. 2): S42–5.
19Rosner, B, Willett, WC, Spiegelman, D. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for systematic within-person measurement error. Statistics in Medicine 1989; 8: 1051–69.
20Rosner, B, Spiegelman, D, Willett, WC. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for measurement error: the case of multiple covariates measured with error. American Journal of Epidemiology 1990; 132: 734–45.
21Tran, KM, Johnson, RK, Soultanakis, RP, Matthews, DE. In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: validation with doubly labeled water. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2000; 100: 777–83.
22Schatzkin, A, Kipnis, V, Carroll, RJ, Midthune, D, Subar, AF, Bingham, S, et al. . A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. International Journal of Epidemiology 2003; 32: 1054–62.
23Ocké, MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita, HB, Goddijn, HE, Jansen, A, Pols, MA, van Staveren, W, et al. . The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. I. Description of the questionnaire, and relative validity and reproducibility for food groups. International Journal of Epidemiology 1997; 26, (Suppl. 1): S37–48.
24Pisani, P, Faggiano, F, Krogh, V, Palli, D, Vineis, P, Berrino, F. Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency dietary questionnaire for use in the Italian EPIC centres. International Journal of Epidemiology 1997; 26, (Suppl. 1): S152–9.
25Willett, W, Lenart, E. Reproducibility and validity of food-frequency questionnaires. In: Willett, W, ed. Nutritional Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998; 101–47.