Skip to main content
×
Home

Development and use of the generic WHO/CDC logic model for vitamin and mineral interventions in public health programmes

  • Luz Maria De-Regil (a1), Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas (a1), Rafael Flores-Ayala (a2) and Maria Elena del Socorro Jefferds (a2)
Abstract
Abstract Objective

Nutrition interventions are critical to achieve the Millennium Development Goals; among them, micronutrient interventions are considered cost-effective and programmatically feasible to scale up, but there are limited tools to communicate the programme components and their relationships. The WHO/CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) logic model for micronutrient interventions in public health programmes is a useful resource for planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of these interventions, which depicts the programme theory and expected relationships between inputs and expected Millennium Development Goals.

Design

The model was developed by applying principles of programme evaluation, public health nutrition theory and programmatic expertise. The multifaceted and iterative structure validation included feedback from potential users and adaptation by national stakeholders involved in public health programmes’ design and implementation.

Results

In addition to the inputs, main activity domains identified as essential for programme development, implementation and performance include: (i) policy; (ii) products and supply; (iii) delivery systems; (iv) quality control; and (v) behaviour change communication. Outputs encompass the access to and coverage of interventions. Outcomes include knowledge and appropriate use of the intervention, as well as effects on micronutrient intake, nutritional status and health of target populations, for ultimate achievement of the Millennium Development Goals.

Conclusions

The WHO/CDC logic model simplifies the process of developing a logic model by providing a tool that has identified high-priority areas and concepts that apply to virtually all public health micronutrient interventions. Countries can adapt it to their context in order to support programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation for the successful scale-up of nutrition interventions in public health.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Development and use of the generic WHO/CDC logic model for vitamin and mineral interventions in public health programmes
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Development and use of the generic WHO/CDC logic model for vitamin and mineral interventions in public health programmes
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Development and use of the generic WHO/CDC logic model for vitamin and mineral interventions in public health programmes
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email mnj5@cdc.gov
References
Hide All
1. United Nations General Assembly (2000) Resolution 2, Session 55. United Nations Millennium Declaration, 8 September 2000. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/55/2&Lang=E
2. United Nations General Assembly (2010) Resolution 1, Session 65. Keeping the promise: united to achieve the Millennium Development Goals, 19 October 2010. http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/pdf/outcome_documentN1051260.pdf
3. World Health Organization (2009) Global Health Risks: Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risks. Geneva: WHO; available at http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GlobalHealthRisks_report_full.pdf
4. Horton S, Shekar M, McDonald C et al. (2010) Scaling Up Nutrition: What will it cost? Washington, DC: World Bank, available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/HealthNutritionandPopulation/Resources/Peer-Reviewed-Publications/ScalingUpNutrition.pdf
5. Pena-Rosas JP, De-Regil LM, Rogers LM et al. (2012) Translating research into action: WHO evidence-informed guidelines for safe and effective micronutrient interventions. J Nutr 142, issue 1, 197S204S.
6. United Nations Development Programme (2010) Unlocking Progress: MDG Acceleration on the Road to 2015. Lessons from the MDG Acceleration Framework Pilot Countries. New York: UNDP; available at http://content.undp.org/go/cms-service/download/asset?asset_id=2844466
7. Frechtling JA (2007) Logic Modeling Methods in Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
8. Renger R & Titcomb A (2002) A three-step approach to teaching logic models. Am J Eval 23, 493503.
9. W. K. Kellogg Foundation (2004) Logic Model Development Guide, pp. 162. Battle Creek, MI: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.
10. UW-Extension-Cooperative Extension, Local Evaluation Project (2003) Overarching logic model: reducing and preventing youth tobacco use, draft 2003. http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodelexamples.html (accessed August 2012).
11. Reed JH, Jordan G & Mortensen J (2005) Generic Logic Models for Federal Program Delivery and Diffusion of Innovation. Presented at the 2005 American Evaluation Association Conference, Toronto, Ontario. http://innovologie.com/AEALogicModel2005.pdf (accessed August 2012).
12. Pena-Rosas JP, Parvanta I, van der Haar F et al. (2008) Monitoring and evaluation in flour fortification programs: design and implementation considerations. Nutr Rev 66, 148162.
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1999) Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR 48, issue RR-11, 140.
14. Home Fortification Technical Advisory Group (2013) A Manual for Developing and Implementing Monitoring Systems for Home Fortification Interventions. Geneva: Home Fortification Technical Advisory Group (In the Press).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 100 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 244 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.