Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Dietary intakes and diet quality according to levels of organic food consumption by French adults: cross-sectional findings from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study

  • Julia Baudry (a1), Benjamin Allès (a1), Sandrine Péneau (a1), Mathilde Touvier (a1), Caroline Méjean (a1), Serge Hercberg (a1) (a2), Pilar Galan (a1), Denis Lairon (a3) and Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot (a1)...
Abstract
Objective

We aimed to assess dietary profiles of adults from the NutriNet-Santé cohort according to different levels of organic food consumption using detailed self-reported data on organic food intakes.

Design

Food intakes were obtained using an organic food frequency questionnaire (Org-FFQ). The participants were ranked into five groups (quintiles, Q) according to the proportion of organic foods in their diet. To determine diet quality, two scores were computed reflecting adherence to food-based recommendations (mPNNS-GS) and the probability of adequate nutrient intake (PANDiet). Relationships between levels of organic food consumption and dietary characteristics were assessed using multivariable-adjusted ANCOVA models.

Setting

The NutriNet-Santé Study.

Subjects

French adults from the NutriNet-Santé Study (n 28 245).

Results

Intakes of foods of plant origin increased along with the contribution of organic foods to the diet while a reverse trend was identified for dairy products, cookies and soda (P-trend<0·0001). The diet quality scores increased from Q1 (mPNNS-GS, 7·89 (se 0·02); PANDiet: 63·04 (se 0·11)) to Q5 (mPNNS-GS, 8·78 (se 0·02); PANDiet, 69·37 (se 0·10)). Overall, high organic food consumers exhibited better diet quality, although intermediate organic food consumers showed better adherence to specific nutritional recommendations related to animal products.

Conclusions

The study provides new insights into the understanding of organic food consumption as a part of a healthy diet and sheds some light on the dietary profiles of different categories of organic food consumers. These results underline strong dietary behaviour correlates associated with organic food consumption that should be controlled for in future aetiological studies on organic foods and health.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Dietary intakes and diet quality according to levels of organic food consumption by French adults: cross-sectional findings from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Dietary intakes and diet quality according to levels of organic food consumption by French adults: cross-sectional findings from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Dietary intakes and diet quality according to levels of organic food consumption by French adults: cross-sectional findings from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Email j.baudry@eren.smbh.univ-paris13.fr
References
Hide All
1. Burlingame, B & Dernini, S (editors) (2012) Sustainable Diets and Biodiversity – Directions and Solutions for Policy Research and Action, Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium Biodiversity and Sustainable Diets United Against Hunger, 3–5 November 2010, FAO Headquarters, Rome. Rome: FAO.
2. Strassner, C, Cavoski, I, Di Cagno, R et al. (2015) How the organic food system supports sustainable diets and translates these into practice. Front Nutr 2, 19.
3. Willer, H & Lernoud, J (2015) The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2015, FiBL–IFOAM Report. Frick/Bonn: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL)/IFOAM – Organics International.
4. Agence Bio CSA (2015) Baromètre de consommation et de perception des produits biologiques en France (Barometer of consumption of organic products in France). http://www.agencebio.org/sites/default/files/upload/documents/4_Chiffres/BarometreConso/barometre_agence_bio_public.pdf (accessed May 2015).
5. Magnusson, MK, Arvola, A, Hursti, U-KK et al. (2003) Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite 40, 109117.
6. Hughner, RS, McDonagh, P, Prothero, A et al. (2007) Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. J Consum Behav 6, 94110.
7. Michaelidou, N & Hassan, LM (2008) The role of health consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. Int J Consum Stud 32, 163170.
8. Aertsens, J, Verbeke, W, Mondelaers, K et al. (2009) Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review. Br Food J 111, 11401167.
9. Hoefkens, C, Verbeke, W, Aertsens, J et al. (2009) The nutritional and toxicological value of organic vegetables: consumer perception versus scientific evidence. Br Food J 111, 10621077.
10. Grunert, KG (2005) Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. Eur Rev Agric Econ 32, 369391.
11. Johansson, E, Hussain, A, Kuktaite, R et al. (2014) Contribution of organically grown crops to human health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11, 38703893.
12. Lairon, D & Huber, M (2014) Food quality and possible positive health effects of organic products. In Organic Farming, Prototype for Sustainable Agricultures, pp. 295312 [S Bellon and S Penvern, editors]. Dordrecht: Springer.
13. Rembiałkowska, E (2007) Quality of plant products from organic agriculture. J Sci Food Agric 87, 27572762.
14. Barański, M, Średnicka-Tober, D, Volakakis, N et al. (2014) Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses. Br J Nutr 112, 794811.
15. Średnicka-Tober, D, Barański, M, Seal, CJ et al. (2016) Higher PUFA and n-3 PUFA, conjugated linoleic acid, α-tocopherol and iron, but lower iodine and selenium concentrations in organic milk: a systematic literature review and meta- and redundancy analyses. Br J Nutr 115, 10431060.
16. Średnicka-Tober, D, Barański, M, Seal, C et al. (2016) Composition differences between organic and conventional meat: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 115, 9941011.
17. Kummeling, I, Thijs, C, Huber, M et al. (2008) Consumption of organic foods and risk of atopic disease during the first 2 years of life in the Netherlands. Br J Nutr 99, 598605.
18. Rist, L, Mueller, A, Barthel, C et al. (2007) Influence of organic diet on the amount of conjugated linoleic acids in breast milk of lactating women in the Netherlands. Br J Nutr 97, 735743.
19. Oates, L, Cohen, M, Braun, L et al. (2014) Reduction in urinary organophosphate pesticide metabolites in adults after a week-long organic diet. Environ Res 132, 105111.
20. Curl, CL, Fenske, RA & Elgethun, K (2002) Organophosphorus pesticide exposure of urban and suburban preschool children with organic and conventional diets. Environ Health Perspect 111, 377382.
21. Curl, CL, Beresford, SAA, Fenske, RA et al. (2015) Estimating pesticide exposure from dietary intake and organic food choices: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Environ Health Perspect 123, 475483.
22. Bradbury, KE, Balkwill, A, Spencer, EA et al. (2014) Organic food consumption and the incidence of cancer in a large prospective study of women in the United Kingdom. Br J Cancer 110, 23212326.
23. Torjusen, H, Brantsæter, AL, Haugen, M et al. (2014) Reduced risk of pre-eclampsia with organic vegetable consumption: results from the prospective Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. BMJ Open 4, e006143.
24. Goetzke, B, Nitzko, S & Spiller, A (2014) Consumption of organic and functional food. A matter of well-being and health? Appetite 77, 94103.
25. Petersen, SB, Rasmussen, MA, Strøm, M et al. (2013) Sociodemographic characteristics and food habits of organic consumers – a study from the Danish National Birth Cohort. Public Health Nutr 16, 18101819.
26. Torjusen, H, Lieblein, G, Naes, T et al. (2012) Food patterns and dietary quality associated with organic food consumption during pregnancy; data from a large cohort of pregnant women in Norway. BMC Public Health 12, 612.
27. Pelletier, JE, Laska, MN, Neumark-Sztainer, D et al. (2013) Positive attitudes toward organic, local, and sustainable foods are associated with higher dietary quality among young adults. J Acad Nutr Diet 113, 127132.
28. Kesse-Guyot, E, Péneau, S, Méjean, C et al. (2013) Profiles of organic food consumers in a large sample of French adults: results from the Nutrinet-Santé Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 8, e76998.
29. Oates, L, Cohen, M & Braun, L (2012) Characteristics and consumption patterns of Australian organic consumers. J Sci Food Agric 92, 27822787.
30. Eisinger-Watzl, M, Wittig, F, Heuer, T et al. (2015) Customers purchasing organic food – do they live healthier? Results of the German National Nutrition Survey II. Eur J Nutr Food Saf 5, 5971.
31. Hercberg, S, Castetbon, K, Czernichow, S et al. (2010) The Nutrinet-Santé Study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status. BMC Public Health 10, 242.
32. Hagströmer, M, Oja, P & Sjöström, M (2006) The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr 9, 755762.
33. Vergnaud, A-C, Touvier, M, Méjean, C et al. (2011) Agreement between web-based and paper versions of a socio-demographic questionnaire in the NutriNet-Santé study. Int J Public Health 56, 407417.
34. Touvier, M, Méjean, C, Kesse-Guyot, E et al. (2010) Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire. Eur J Epidemiol 25, 287296.
35. Insee – Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (2015) Definitions, methods and quality. http://www.insee.fr/en/methodes/ (accessed February 2015).
36. Kesse-Guyot, E, Castetbon, K, Touvier, M et al. (2010) Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire designed for French adults. Ann Nutr Metab 57, 153162.
37. Baudry, J, Méjean, C, Allès, B et al. (2015) Contribution of organic food to the diet in a large sample of French adults (the NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study). Nutrients 7, 86158632.
38. Le Moullec, N, Deheeger, M, Preziosi, P et al. (1996) Validation du manuel-photos utilisé pour l’enquête alimentaire de l’étude SU.VI.MAX. Cah Nutr Diet 31, 158164.
39. Etude Nutrinet-Santé (2013) Table de composition des aliments de l’étude Nutrinet-Santé (Nutrinet-Santé Study Food Composition Database). Paris: Economica.
40. Estaquio, C, Kesse-Guyot, E, Deschamps, V et al. (2009) Adherence to the French Programme National Nutrition Santé Guideline Score is associated with better nutrient intake and nutritional status. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 10311041.
41. Verger, EO, Mariotti, F, Holmes, BA et al. (2012) Evaluation of a diet quality index based on the probability of adequate nutrient intake (PANDiet) using national French and US dietary surveys. PLoS ONE 7, e42155.
42. Insee – Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (2015) Définitions et méthodes – La macro SAS CALMAR. http://www.insee.fr/fr/methodes/default.asp?page=outils/calmar/accueil_calmar.htm (accessed July 2015).
43. Schofield, WN (1985) Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 39, Suppl. 1, 541.
44. Schifferstein, HNJ & Oude Ophuis, PAM (1998) Health-related determinants of organic food consumption in The Netherlands. Food Qual Prefer 9, 119133.
45. Yiridoe, EK, Bonti-Ankomah, S & Martin, RC (2005) Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: a review and update of the literature. Renew Agric Food Syst 20, 193205.
46. Dettmann, RL & Dimitri, C (2009) Who’s buying organic vegetables? Demographic characteristics of US consumers. J Food Prod Mark 16, 7991.
47. Hassan, D, Monier-Dilhan, S, Nichele, V et al. (2009) Organic food consumption patterns in France. J Agric Food Ind Organ 7, 123.
48. Torjusen, H, Brantsæter, AL, Haugen, M et al. (2010) Characteristics associated with organic food consumption during pregnancy; data from a large cohort of pregnant women in Norway. BMC Public Health 10, 775.
49. Pearson, D, Henryks, J, Sultan, P et al. (2013) Organic food: exploring purchase frequency to explain consumer behavior. J Org Syst 8, 5063.
50. Juan, W, Yamini, S & Britten, P (2015) Food intake patterns of self-identified vegetarians among the US population, 2007–2010. Procedia Food Sci 4, 8693.
51. Pirjo Honkanen, BV (2006) Ethical values and motives driving organic food choice. J Consum Behav 5, 420430.
52. De Backer, CJS & Hudders, L (2014) From meatless Mondays to meatless Sundays: motivations for meat reduction among vegetarians and semi-vegetarians who mildly or significantly reduce their meat intake. Ecol Food Nutr 53, 639657.
53. Forestell, CA, Spaeth, AM & Kane, SA (2012) To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females. Appetite 58, 319325.
54. Kesse-Guyot, E, Touvier, M, Henegar, A et al. (2011) Higher adherence to French dietary guidelines and chronic diseases in the prospective SU.VI.MAX cohort. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 887894.
55. Kesse-Guyot, E, Castetbon, K, Estaquio, C et al. (2009) Association between the French nutritional guideline-based score and 6-year anthropometric changes in a French middle-aged adult cohort. Am J Epidemiol 170, 757765.
56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015) Assessing Sustainable Diets within the Sustainability of Food Systems. http://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/e7ca2e1b-dd6f-4709-b582-5f10594e84cd (accessed September 2015).
57. Tuomisto, HL, Hodge, ID, Riordan, P et al. (2012) Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts? – a meta-analysis of European research. J Environ Manage 112, 309320.
58. Gomiero, T, Pimentel, D & Paoletti, MG (2011) Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: conventional vs. organic agriculture. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30, 95124.
59. Mondelaers, K, Aertsens, J & Van Huylenbroeck, G (2009) A meta-analysis of the differences in environmental impacts between organic and conventional farming. Br Food J 111, 10981119.
60. Tilman, D & Clark, M (2014) Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature 515, 518522.
61. Lockie, S, Lyons, K, Lawrence, G et al. (2002) Eating ‘green’: motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia. Sociol Rural 42, 2340.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Baudry supplementary material
Figure S1

 Word (178 KB)
178 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Baudry supplementary material
Tables S1 and S2

 Word (28 KB)
28 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed