Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Disclosures of Coca-Cola funding: transparent or opaque?

  • Marilyn Tseng, Joaquin Barnoya, Salome Kruger, Carl Lachat, Stefanie Vandevijvere and Eduardo Villamor...
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Disclosures of Coca-Cola funding: transparent or opaque?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Disclosures of Coca-Cola funding: transparent or opaque?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Disclosures of Coca-Cola funding: transparent or opaque?
      Available formats
      ×
Abstract
Copyright
Corresponding author
Email: mtseng@calpoly.edu
References
Hide All
1. O’Connor, A (2015) Coca-Cola funds scientists who shift blame for obesity away from bad diets. The New York Times, 9 August 2015. https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/08/09/coca-cola-funds-scientists-who-shift-blame-for-obesity-away-from-bad-diets/ (accessed February 2018).
2. Kent, M (2015) ‘We’ll Do Better’: Coca-Cola Vows to Improve Transparency. http://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/well-do-better-coca-cola-vows-to-improve-transparency (accessed February 2018).
3. The Coca-Cola Company (2017) Our Actions and Way Forward. http://transparency.coca-colacompany.com (accessed February 2018).
4. The Coca-Cola Company (2017) List of Health Professionals and Scientific Experts. http://www.coca-colacompany.com/transparency/list-of-health-professionals-and-scientific-experts (accessed February 2018).
5. Serôdio, PM, McKee, M & Stuckler, D (2018) Coca-Cola – a model of transparency in research partnerships? A network analysis of Coca-Cola’s research funding (2008–2016). Public Health Nutr (Epublication ahead of print version).
6. Kesselheim, AS, Wang, B, Studdert, DM et al. (2012) Conflict of interest reporting by authors involved in promotion of off-label drug use: an analysis of journal disclosures. PLoS Med 9, e1001280.
7. Rasmussen, K, Schroll, J, Gøtzsche, PC et al. (2015) Under-reporting of conflicts of interest among trialists: a cross-sectional study. J R Soc Med 108, 101107.
8. Norris, SL, Holmer, HK, Ogden, LA et al. (2012) Characteristics of physicians receiving large payments from pharmaceutical companies and the accuracy of their disclosures in publications: an observational study. BMC Med Ethics 13, 24.
9. Choi, C (2015) APNewsBreak: Emails reveal Coke’s role in anti-obesity group. AP News, 24 November 2015. http://www.apnews.com/1fd235360ac94dcf893a87e3074a03a5/apnewsbreak-emails-reveal-cokes-role-anti-obesity-group (accessed February 2018).
10. Tseng, M, Hodge, A, Lachat, C et al. (2016) On the pitfalls of disclosure statements. Public Health Nutr 19, 383.
11. Shawwa, K, Kallas, R, Koujanian, S et al. (2016) Requirements of clinical journals for authors’ disclosure of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest: a cross sectional study. PLoS One 11, e0152301.
12. Khamis, AM, Hakoum, MB, Bou-Karroum, L et al. (2017) Requirements of health policy and services journals for authors to disclose financial and non-financial conflicts of interest: a cross-sectional study. Health Res Policy Syst 15, 80.
13. Resnik, DB, Konecny, B & Kissling, GE (2017) Conflict of interest and funding disclosure policies of environmental, occupational, and public health journals. J Occup Environ Med 59, 2833.
14. Fontanarosa, P & Bauchner, H (2017) Conflict of interest and medical journals. JAMA 317, 17681771.
15. Committee on Publication Ethics (2013) What to do if a reader suspects undisclosed conflict of interest (CoI) in a published article. http://www.publicationethics.org/files/COI%20published.pdf (accessed February 2018).
16. Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Moubarac, JC et al. (2018) Ultra-processing. An odd ‘appraisal’. Public Health Nutr 21, 497501.
17. Lesser, LI, Ebbeling, CB, Goozner, M et al. (2007) Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. PLoS Med 4, e5.
18. Bes-Rastrollo, M, Schulze, MB, Ruiz-Canela, M et al. (2013) Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. PLoS Med 10, e1001578.
19. Massougbodji, J, Le Bodo, Y, Fratu, R et al. (2014) Reviews examining sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight: correlates of their quality and conclusions. Am J Clin Nutr 99, 10961104.
20. Mandrioli, D, Kearns, CE & Bero, LA (2016) Relationship between research outcomes and risk of bias, study sponsorship, and author financial conflicts of interest in reviews of the effects of artificially sweetened beverages on weight outcomes: a systematic review of reviews. PLoS One 11, e0162198.
21. Ludwig, D (2018) Source of bias in sugar-sweetened beverage research: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr (In the Press).
22. Carlisle, JB (2017) Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals. Anaesthesia 72, 944952.
23. Sacks, G, Swinburn, BA, Cameron, AJ et al. (2018) How food companies influence evidence and opinion – straight from the horse’s mouth. Crit Public Health 28, 253256.
24. The Coca-Cola Company (2012) Education. http://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/education (accessed February 2018).
25. Fuller, T, O’Connor, A & Richtel, M (2017) In Asia’s fattest country, nutritionists take money from food giants. New York Times, 23 December 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/23/health/obesity-malaysia-nestle.html (accessed February 2018).
26. Persaud, N, Ringer, T & Lemmens, T (2014) How can journals respond to threats of libel litigation? PLoS Med 11, e1001615.
27. Aveyard, P, Yach, D, Gilmore, AB et al. (2016) Should we welcome food industry funding of public health research? BMJ 353, i2161.
28. Dunn, AG, Coiera, E, Mandl, KD et al. (2016) Conflict of interest disclosure in biomedical research: a review of current practices, biases, and the role of public registries in improving transparency. Res Integr Peer Rev 1, 1.
29. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2018) Open Payments. http://www.cms.gov/OpenPayments/index.html (accessed February 2018).
30. Stead, WW (2017) The complex and multifaceted aspects of conflicts of interest. JAMA 317, 17651767.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed