5. Serôdio, PM, McKee, M & Stuckler, D (2018) Coca-Cola – a model of transparency in research partnerships? A network analysis of Coca-Cola’s research funding (2008–2016). Public Health Nutr (Epublication ahead of print version).
6. Kesselheim, AS, Wang, B, Studdert, DM et al. (2012) Conflict of interest reporting by authors involved in promotion of off-label drug use: an analysis of journal disclosures. PLoS Med 9, e1001280.
7. Rasmussen, K, Schroll, J, Gøtzsche, PC et al. (2015) Under-reporting of conflicts of interest among trialists: a cross-sectional study. J R Soc Med 108, 101–107.
8. Norris, SL, Holmer, HK, Ogden, LA et al. (2012) Characteristics of physicians receiving large payments from pharmaceutical companies and the accuracy of their disclosures in publications: an observational study. BMC Med Ethics 13, 24.
10. Tseng, M, Hodge, A, Lachat, C et al. (2016) On the pitfalls of disclosure statements. Public Health Nutr 19, 383.
11. Shawwa, K, Kallas, R, Koujanian, S et al. (2016) Requirements of clinical journals for authors’ disclosure of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest: a cross sectional study. PLoS One 11, e0152301.
12. Khamis, AM, Hakoum, MB, Bou-Karroum, L et al. (2017) Requirements of health policy and services journals for authors to disclose financial and non-financial conflicts of interest: a cross-sectional study. Health Res Policy Syst 15, 80.
13. Resnik, DB, Konecny, B & Kissling, GE (2017) Conflict of interest and funding disclosure policies of environmental, occupational, and public health journals. J Occup Environ Med 59, 28–33.
14. Fontanarosa, P & Bauchner, H (2017) Conflict of interest and medical journals. JAMA 317, 1768–1771.
16. Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Moubarac, JC et al. (2018) Ultra-processing. An odd ‘appraisal’. Public Health Nutr 21, 497–501.
17. Lesser, LI, Ebbeling, CB, Goozner, M et al. (2007) Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. PLoS Med 4, e5.
18. Bes-Rastrollo, M, Schulze, MB, Ruiz-Canela, M et al. (2013) Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. PLoS Med 10, e1001578.
19. Massougbodji, J, Le Bodo, Y, Fratu, R et al. (2014) Reviews examining sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight: correlates of their quality and conclusions. Am J Clin Nutr 99, 1096–1104.
20. Mandrioli, D, Kearns, CE & Bero, LA (2016) Relationship between research outcomes and risk of bias, study sponsorship, and author financial conflicts of interest in reviews of the effects of artificially sweetened beverages on weight outcomes: a systematic review of reviews. PLoS One 11, e0162198.
21. Ludwig, D (2018) Source of bias in sugar-sweetened beverage research: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr (In the Press).
22. Carlisle, JB (2017) Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals. Anaesthesia 72, 944–952.
23. Sacks, G, Swinburn, BA, Cameron, AJ et al. (2018) How food companies influence evidence and opinion – straight from the horse’s mouth. Crit Public Health 28, 253–256.
26. Persaud, N, Ringer, T & Lemmens, T (2014) How can journals respond to threats of libel litigation? PLoS Med 11, e1001615.
27. Aveyard, P, Yach, D, Gilmore, AB et al. (2016) Should we welcome food industry funding of public health research? BMJ 353, i2161.
28. Dunn, AG, Coiera, E, Mandl, KD et al. (2016) Conflict of interest disclosure in biomedical research: a review of current practices, biases, and the role of public registries in improving transparency. Res Integr Peer Rev 1, 1.
30. Stead, WW (2017) The complex and multifaceted aspects of conflicts of interest. JAMA 317, 1765–1767.