Skip to main content
×
Home

The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity

  • Maria Hagströmer (a1) (a2), Pekka Oja (a1) and Michael Sjöström (a1)
Abstract
AbstractIntroduction

The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed to measure health-related physical activity (PA) in populations. The short version of the IPAQ has been tested extensively and is now used in many international studies. The present study aimed to explore the validity characteristics of the long-version IPAQ.

Subjects and methods

Forty-six voluntary healthy male and female subjects (age, mean±standard deviation: 40.7±10.3 years) participated in the study. PA indicators derived from the long, self-administered IPAQ were compared with data from an activity monitor and a PA log book for concurrent validity, and with aerobic fitness, body mass index (BMI) and percentage body fat for construct validity.

Results

Strong positive relationships were observed between the activity monitor data and the IPAQ data for total PA (ρ = 0.55, P < 0.001) and vigorous PA (ρ = 0.71, P < 0.001), but a weaker relationship for moderate PA (ρ = 0.21, P = 0.051). Calculated MET-h day−1 from the PA log book was significantly correlated with MET-h day−1 from the IPAQ (ρ = 0.67, P < 0.001). A weak correlation was observed between IPAQ data for total PA and both aerobic fitness (ρ = 0.21, P = 0.051) and BMI (ρ = 0.25, P = 0.009). No significant correlation was observed between percentage body fat and IPAQ variables. Bland–Altman analysis suggested that the inability of activity monitors to detect certain types of activities might introduce a source of error in criterion validation studies.

Conclusions

The long, self-administered IPAQ questionnaire has acceptable validity when assessing levels and patterns of PA in healthy adults.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email maria.hagstromer@prevnut.ki.se
References
Hide All
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Physical Activity and Health. A Report from the Surgeon General. Pittsburg, PA: CDC, 1996.
2Booth M. Assessment of physical activity: an international perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2000; 71: S114–20.
3Oja P. Descriptive epidemiology of health-related physical activity and fitness. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1995; 66: 303–12.
4Welk G, Physical Assessment in Health-related Research. pLeeds, UK: Human Kinetics, 2002.
5Wareham NJ, Rennie KL. The assessment of physical activity in individuals and populations: why try to be more precise about how physical activity is assessed? International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 1998; 22(Suppl. 2): S30–8.
6Kriska A, Caspersen C, Introduction. In: Pereira MA, FitzerGerald SJ, Gregg EW, Joswiak ML, Ryan WJ, Suminski RR, et al. eds. A Collection of Physical Activity Questionnaires for Health-related Research [special issue]. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1997; 29: S3–9.
7Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2003; 35: 1381–95.
8Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA). Activity Monitor Operator's Manual, Model 7164, Version AM 7164-2.2. Shalimar, FL: CSA, 1995.
9Sallis JF, Saelens BE. Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2000; 71: S1S14.
10Rutten A, Abu-Omar K. Prevalence of physical activity in the European Union Sozial- und Präventivmedizin 2004; 49: 281–9.
11 The International Physical Activity Questionnaire, 2005. Available at http://www.ipaq.ki.se/
12American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1998; 30: 975–91.
13Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, Jacobs DR Jr, Montoye HJ, Sallis JF, et al. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1993; 25: 7180.
14Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2000; 32: S498S504.
15Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1998; 30: 777–81.
16Yngve A, Nilsson A, Sjostrom M, Ekelund U. Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the MTI accelerometer output. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2003; 35: 320–6.
17Borg G, Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Stockholm: Human Kinetics, 1998.
18American College of Sports Medicine. Physical fitness testing. In: ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. London: Williams & Wilkins, 1995; 4978.
19Durnin JV, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. British Journal of Nutrition 1974; 32: 7797.
20Norton K, Olds T. Anthropometrica: A Textbook of Body Measurement for Sports and Health Courses. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 1996; 8090.
21Altman D. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
22Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine 1998; 26: 217–38.
23Rennie KL, Wareham NJ. The validation of physical activity instruments for measuring energy expenditure: problems and pitfalls. Public Health Nutrition 1998; 1: 265–71.
24Schoeller DA. Measurement of energy expenditure in free-living humans by using doubly labeled water. Journal of Nutrition 1988; 118: 1278–89.
25Ekelund U, Sjostrom M, Yngve A, Poortvliet E, Nilsson A, Froberg K, et al. Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in children. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2001; 33: 275–81.
26Sirard JR, Pate RR. Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Sports Medicine 2001; 31: 439–54.
27Washburn RA, Heath GW, Jackson AW. Reliability and validity issues concerning large-scale surveillance of physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2000; 71: S104–13.
28Bassett DR Jr. Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2000; 71: S30–6.
29Klesges RC, Eck LH, Mellon MW, Fulliton W, Somes GW, Hanson CL. The accuracy of self-reports of physical activity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1990; 22: 690–7.
30Sirard JR, Melanson EL, Li L, Freedson PS. Field evaluation of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. physical activity monitor. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2000; 32: 695700.
31Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P. Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2000; 32: S442–9.
32Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sjostrom M, Westerterp K. Field evaluation of the Computer Science and Application's Inc. activity monitor during running and skating training in adolescent athletes. International Journal of Sports Medicine 2000; 21: 586–92.
33Freedson P, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1998; 30: 777–81.
34Ainsworth BE, Bassett DR Jr, Strath SJ, Swartz AM, O'Brien WL, Thompson RW, et al. Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2000; 32: S457–64.
35Nichols JF, Morgan CG, Chabot LE, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ. Assessment of physical activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., accelerometer: laboratory versus field validation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2000; 71: 3643.
36Wareham NJ, Jakes RW, Rennie KL, Mitchell J, Hennings S, Day NE. Validity and repeatability of the EPIC–Norfolk Physical Activity Questionnaire. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002; 31: 168–74.
37Pereira MA, FitzerGerald SJ, Gregg EW, Joswiak ML, Ryan WJ, Suminski RR, et al. , eds. A collection of Physical Activity Questionnaires for health-related research [special issue]. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1997; 29: S1–205.
38Jacobs DR Jr, Haskell HW, Haskell L, Pirie P, Sidney S. Reliability and validity of a short physical activity history: CARDIA and Minnesota Heart Health Program. J Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation 1989; 9: 448–59.
39Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Leblanc C, Lortie G, Savard R, Theriault G. A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1983; 37: 461–7.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 3316 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 4861 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.