Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-rkzlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-09T11:41:38.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors which influence ‘healthy’ eating patterns: results from the 1993 Health Education Authority health and lifestyle survey in England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1998

BM Margetts ,
RL Thompson ,
V Speller  and
D McVey
BM Margetts*
Affiliation:
Institute of Human Nutrition, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
RL Thompson
Affiliation:
Institute of Human Nutrition, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
V Speller
Affiliation:
Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
D McVey
Affiliation:
Health Education Authority, Trevelyan House, 30 Great Peter Street, London SW1P 2HW, UK
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail bmm@soton.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

This study explores the factors that influence eating patterns in a nationally representative sample of the English population.

Design:

Subjects were interviewed in 1993; questions covered basic demographic details, attitudes about nutrition, and they completed a short food frequency questionnaire that had previously been validated. Cluster analysis was used to summarize dietary intake into more or less healthy clusters.

Setting:

A random sample ofthe English population.

Subjects:

A cross-sectional survey of 5553 men and women (response rate 70%) aged between 16 and 74 years.

Results:

As defined from the cluster analysis about half the sample were currently reporting a more healthy diet; respondents in the better educated middle-aged demographic cluster were more likely to report eating a more healthy diet than respondents in the younger lower-income family cluster. About three-quarters of all respondents believed that they either already ate a healthy diet or had changed to a healthy diet in the last 3 years. For those respondents who said they were eating a healthy diet about half of them were eating a more healthy diet. Respondents who had not changed their diet were more likely than those who had to believe that healthy foods were just another fashion (men 34% v. 13%; women 30% v. 12%). or expensive (men 50% v. 35%; women 53% v. 40%); they were less likely to care about what they ate (men 45% v. 13%; women 27% v. 7%). Nearly three-quarters of all respondents agreed that experts never agree about what foods are good for you. Younger, low-income families, and those who smoked, were the group least likely to be eating a more healthy diet.

Conclusions:

The results of this study suggest that about half of the population has reported a change to a healthier diet over the last 3 years and that overall about half of the population report eating a healthy diet. Those who had not made any change and were currently reporting a less healthy diet were more likely to smoke and come from the 'worse off' group in the survey; they were also more likely to hold negative attitudes about healthy eating. A more focused and integrated approach to promoting Dietary change healthy lifestyle in general is required, while at the same time ensuring that there is healthy eating continued support for the majority of the population who have made healthy dietary Cluster analysis changes.

Keywords

Dietary changeHealthy eatingCluster analysisDemographic behaviour

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 193 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1998

References

1Public Health Service. Healthy people 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1991.Google Scholar
2US Department of Agriculture. Nutrition and your health. dietary guidelines for Americans. USDA, 1995.Google Scholar
3Department of Health. The Health of the Nation. A Strategy for Health in England. London: HMSO, 1992.Google Scholar
4Gregory, J, Foster, K, Tyler, H, Wiseman, M. The Dietary and Nutritional survey of British Adults. London: HMSO, 1990.Google Scholar
5Bennett, N, Dodd, T, Flateley, J, Freeth, S, Bolling, K. Health Sunvey of England 1993. London: HMSO, 1995.Google Scholar
6Treiman, K, Freimuth, V, Damron, D et al. Attitudes and behaviour related to fruits and vegetables among low-income women in the WIC Program. J. Nutr. Educ. 1996; 28: 149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Variyam, JN, Blaylock, J, Smallwood, DM. Modelling nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and diet-disease awareness: the case of dietary fibre. Stat. Med. 1996; 15: 23–35.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Paisley, C, Lloyd, H, Spaarks, P, Mela, DJ. Consumer perceptions of dietary changes for reducing fat intake. Nutr. Res. 1995; 15: 1755–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Worsley, A, Crawford, D. Awareness and compliance with the Australian dietary guidelines: a descriptive study of Melbourne residents. Nutr. Res. 1986; 5: 1291–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Devine, CM, Sandstrom, B. Danish women's attitudes and beliefs ahout dietary Fat: age group differences. Scand. J. Nutr. 1995; 39: 98–102.Google Scholar
11Griffith, S, Chipperfield, B, Todd, S, Rushton, C, McCarthy, M. Dietary beliefs, practices and attitudes of adults in an inner city population. J. Hum. Nutr. Dietel. 1994; 7: 319–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Thorogood, M, Coulter, A, Jones, L, Yudkin, P, Muire, J, Mant, D. Factors affecting response to an invitation to attend for a health check. J. Epidemiol. Coin. Health 1993: 47: 224–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Margetts, B, McVey, D, Oldfield, K et al. Health and Lifestyle Survey. London: Health Education Authority, 1997.Google Scholar
14Kish, L. Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar
15Moser, C, Kalton, G. Survey Methods in Social Investigation. London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1979.Google Scholar
16Roe, L, Strong, C, Whiteside, C, Neil, A, Mant, D. Dietary intervention in primary care: validity of the DINE method for dietary assessment. Family Practice 1994; 11: 375–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. The 1991 Census. London: HMSO, 1993.Google Scholar
18Millen, BE, Quatromoni, PA, Cagnon, DR, Cupples, LA, Franz, MM, D'Agostino, RB. Dietary patterns of men and women suggest targets for health promotion: the Framing-ham Nutrition Survey. Am. J. Health Promot. 1996; 11: 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Huijbregts, PPCW, Feskens, EJM, Krornhout, D. Dietary patterns and cardiovascular risk factors in elderly men. the Zutphen Elderly Study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1995; 24: 313–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Armitage, P, Berry, G. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, third edition, 1994.Google Scholar
21Foster, Jackson B, Thomas, M, Hunter, P, Bennett, N. General Household Survey 1993. London: HMSO, 1995.Google Scholar
22Margetts, BM, Jackson, AA. Interactions between people's diet and their smoking habits: the dietary and nutritional survey of British Adults. Br. Med. J. 1993; 307: 1381–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed