Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-qcsxw Total loading time: 0.38 Render date: 2022-08-08T07:09:24.338Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Food company sponsorship of nutrition research and professional activities: a conflict of interest?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Marion Nestle*
Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, New York University, 35 W. 4th Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10012-1172, USA
*Corrresponding author: Email
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2001


1Kluger, R. Ashes to Ashes: America's Hundred-Year Cigarette War, the Public Health, and the Unabashed Triumph of Philip Morris. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996.Google Scholar
2Barnes, DE, Bero, LA. Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA 1998; 279: 1566–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Cho, MK, Bero, LA. The quality of drug studies published in symposium proceedings. Ann. Intern. Med. 1996; 124: 485–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Soley, LC. Leasing the Ivory Tower: The Corporate Takeover of Academia. Boston, MA: South End Press, 1995.Google Scholar
5Relman, AS. Separating continuing medical education from pharmaceutical marketing. JAMA 2001; 285: 2009–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Moses, H, Martin, JB. Academic relationships with industry: a new model for biomedical research. JAMA 2001; 285: 933–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Rosenthal, B, Jacobson, M, Bohm, M. Feeding at the company trough. Congressional Record, 08 26, 1976; H8974–7.Google Scholar
8Cannon, G. The Politics of Food. London: Century Hutchinson, 1987.Google Scholar
9Dietary Guidelines Alliance. Reaching Consumers with Meaningful Health Messages: A Handbook for Nutrition and Food Communicators. Chicago, IL: Dietary Guidelines Alliance, 1996.Google Scholar
10Owen, BM, Braeutigam, R. The Regulation Game: Strategic Use of the Administrative Process. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1978; 7.Google Scholar
11Nestle, M. Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002 (in press).Google Scholar
12Shell, ER. The Hippocratic wars. New York Times Magazine, 06 28, 1998; 34–8.Google Scholar
13American Dietetic Association and American Dietetic Association Foundation. 1999 ADA/F Annual Report [Online]. Available: (2000, 13 04).Google Scholar
14Angell, M. Is academic medicine for sale?. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000; 342: 1516–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Altman, LK. New England Journal of Medicine names third editor in a year. New York Times, 05 12, 2000; A20.Google Scholar
16Wazana, A. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: is a gift ever just a gift?. JAMA 2000; 283: 373–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Wilde, P. Media coverage spurs fad for vitamin pills, after year-long industry effort. Nutrition Week, 05 22, 1992; 16.Google Scholar
18Blumenthal, D, Campbell, EG, Causino, N, Louis, KS. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996; 335: 1734–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Krimsky, S, Rothenberg, LS, Kyle, G, Stott, P. Financial interests of authors in scientific journals: a pilot study of 14 publications. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 1996; 2: 395410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Stelfox, HT, Chua, G, O'Rourke, K, Detsky, AS. Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998; 338: 101–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Bero, LA. Accepting commercial sponsorship: disclosure helps – but is not a panacea. Brit. Med. J. 1999; 319: 653–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Friedberg, M, Saffran, B, Stinson, TJ, Nelson, W, Bennett, CL. Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology. JAMA 1999; 282: 1453–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Bero, LA, Barnes, D. Industry affiliations and scientific conclusions [letter]. JAMA 1998; 280: 1142.Google Scholar
24Avoid financial ‘correctness’: insistence that authors declare business interests in papers is beside the point [editorial]. Nature 1997; 385: 469.Google Scholar
25Campbell, P, Dhand, R. Nature insight: obesity. Nature 2000; 404: 631–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Bray, GA, Tartaglia, LA. Medicinal strategies in the treatment of obesity. Nature 2000; 404: 672–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Squires, S. Food and choice: Heart Association's plan to endorse certain products is a bold gamble in educating a confused public. Washington Post Health, 07 5, 1988; 9.Google Scholar
28Sugarman, C. What price approval? Heart Association's planraises food firms' pressure. Washington Post, 08 30, 1989; E1, E4.Google Scholar
29Parachini, A. Food fight: Heart Association plan to label ‘healthy’ foods drawing fire from agencies, nutritionists. Washington Post, 08 2, 1988; E1, E6.Google Scholar
30 State attorneys general support FDA position on AHA HeartGuide label. Nutrition Week, 02 8, 1990; 1.Google Scholar
31American Institute of Nutrition and The American Society for Clinical Nutrition. Objections to ‘Seal of Approval Programs’. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1990; 51(4): unpaginated.Google Scholar
32Angier, N. Heart Association cancels its program to rate foods. New York Times, 04 3, 1990; A1, C6.Google Scholar
33American Heart Association. Food for thought [flier]. 10, 1997.Google Scholar
34Kellogg Company. Letter in press release addressed to Dear Health Professional. Battle Creek, MI, 02, 1997.Google Scholar
35American Heart Association. Food certification program [Online]. Available: (2000, 15 04).Google Scholar
36Raeburn, P. The Heart Association is selling its soul. Business Week, 11 24, 1997; 96.Google Scholar
37Florida Grapefruit Juice. Fight heart disease; drink Florida Grapefruit Juice [advertisement]. New York Times, 10 29, 1997; F4.Google Scholar
38Burros, M. Additives in advice on food. New York Times, 11 15, 1995; C1, C5.Google Scholar
39American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition education for the public. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1996; 96: 1183–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40McDonald's Corporation. American Dietetic Association and McDonald's partner to teach kids the fundamentals of nutrition [news release]. Oak Brook, IL, 02 24, 1993.Google Scholar
41American Dietetic Association. Nutrition Fact Sheets [Online]. Available: (1997, 11 15; 2000, 04 10).Google Scholar
42Gallagher, A. Taking a stand on emerging issues. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2000; 100: 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Kellogg's full-page colour advertisement. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2000; 100: 496.Google Scholar
44 Kellogg's claim for heart benefits challenged by CSPI. Food Regulation Weekly, 07 3, 2000; 10.Google Scholar
45American Dietetic Association. Code of ethics for the profession of dietetics. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1999; 99: 109–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46McNutt, K. Conflict of interest. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1999; 99: 2930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Rock, CL. Conflict of interest: an import issue in nutrition research and communications. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1999; 99: 31–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Food and Nutrition Board. Toward Healthful Diets. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1980.Google Scholar
49Brody, JE. Experts assail report declaring curb on cholesterol isn't needed. New York Times, 06 1, 1980; A1.Google Scholar
50Broad, WJ. Academy says curb on cholesterol not needed. Science 1980; 208: 1354–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Wade, N. Food Board's fat report hits fire. Science 1980; 209: 248–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52 National Academy of Sciences tightens its grip on the Food and Nutrition Board. Nutrition Today, 01/02 1984; 31–2.Google Scholar
53Krimsky, S, Rothenberg, LS. Financial interest and its disclosure in scientific publications. JAMA 1998; 280: 225–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Food and Drug Administration. Final guidance on industry-supported scientific and educational activities: notice. Federal Register; 62: 64074–100 (12 3, 1997).Google Scholar
55Stolberg, SG. New rules will force doctors to disclose ties to drug industry. New York Times, 02 3, 1998; A12.Google ScholarPubMed
56 The Lancet. Writing for The Lancet [Online]. Available: (2000, 10 04).Google Scholar
57British Medical Journal. Declaration of competing interest: guidance for authors [Online]. Available: (1999, 17 07).Google Scholar
58Krimsky, S, Rothenberg, LS. Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: editorial practices and author disclosures. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 2001; 7: 205–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59Meydani, SN, Meydani, M, Leka, L, Blumberg, J. Vitamin E supplementation and immune response in elderly patients [letter]. JAMA 1998; 279: 505–6.Google Scholar
60Rothman, KJ. Conflict of interest: the new McCarthyism in science. JAMA 1993; 269: 2782–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Commercial sponsorship in the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1999.Google Scholar
62Kassirer, JP. Financial indigestion. JAMA 2000; 284: 2156–7.Google ScholarPubMed
63Bero, LA. Disclosure policies for gifts from industry to academic faculty. JAMA 1998; 279: 1031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64 US Department of Health and Human Services. Financial relationships in clinical research: issues for institutions, clinical investigators, and IRBs to consider when dealing with issues of financial interests and human subject protection [Online]. Available: (2001, 11 04).Google Scholar
65Tobin, DS, Dwyer, J, Gussow, JD. Cooperative relationships between professional societies and the food industry: opportunities or problems?. Nutr. Rev. 1992; 50: 300306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66Levine, J, Gussow, JD. Consider the source. New York Times, 09 30, 1994; A31.Google Scholar
You have Access
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Food company sponsorship of nutrition research and professional activities: a conflict of interest?
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Food company sponsorship of nutrition research and professional activities: a conflict of interest?
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Food company sponsorship of nutrition research and professional activities: a conflict of interest?
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *