1. Nestle, M (2013)
Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health, 1st ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2. Matos Serodio, P, Stuckler, D, Mckee, M et al. (2016) OP76 Corporate funding of scientific research: a case study of Coca-Cola. J Epidemiol Community Health 70, A42–A43.
3. Nestle, M (2016) Corporate funding of food and nutrition research: science or marketing? JAMA Intern Med 176, 13–14.
5. Singh, A & Singh, S (2005) The connection between academia and industry. Mens Sana Monogr 3, 5–35.
6. Barnes, DE & Bero, LA (1998) Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA 279, 1566–1570.
7. Bero, L, Oostvogel, F, Bacchetti, P et al. (2007) Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug–drug comparisons: why some statins appear more efficacious than others. PLoS Med 4, e184.
8. Lundh, A, Lexchin, J, Mintzes, B et al. (2017) Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2, MR000033.
9. Vedula, SS, Bero, L, Scherer, RW et al. (2009) Outcome reporting in industry-sponsored trials of gabapentin for off-label use. N Engl J Med 361, 1963–1971.
10. Vera-Badillo, FE, Shapiro, R, Ocana, A et al. (2013) Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 24, 1238–1244.
11. Barnes, DE & Bero, LA (1996) Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research. J Health Polit Policy Law 21, 515–542.
12. Chartres, N, Fabbri, A & Bero, LA (2016) Association of industry sponsorship with outcomes of nutrition studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 176, 1769–1777.
14. Kearns, CE, Glantz, SA & Schmidt, LA (2015) Sugar industry influence on the scientific agenda of the National Institute of Dental Research’s 1971 National Caries Program: a historical analysis of internal documents. PLoS Med 12, e1001798.
15. Kearns, CE, Schmidt, LA & Glantz, SA (2016) Sugar industry and coronary heart disease research: a historical analysis of internal industry documents. JAMA Intern Med 176, 1680–1685.
16. Scrinis, G (2013) Nutritionism: The Science and Politics of Dietary Advice. New York: Columbia University Press.
17. Fabbri, A, Chartres, N, Scrinis, G et al. (2017) Study sponsorship and the nutrition research agenda: analysis of randomized controlled trials included in systematic reviews of nutrition interventions to address obesity. Public Health Nutr 20, 1306–1313.
18. Fabbri A, Chartres N & Bero LA (2017) Study sponsorship and the nutrition research agenda: analysis of cohort studies examining the association between nutrition and obesity. Public Health Nutr 20, 3193–3199.
19. Nestle, M (2016) Soda Politics: Taking on Big Soda (and Winning). New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Weed, DL, Althuis, MD & Mink, PJ (2011) Quality of reviews on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 94, 1340–1347.
25. Menachemi, N, Tajeu, G, Sen, B et al. (2013) Overstatement of results in the nutrition and obesity peer-reviewed literature. Am J Prev Med 45, 615–621.
26. Mastroiacovo, D, Kwik-Uribe, C, Grassi, D et al. (2015) Cocoa flavanol consumption improves cognitive function, blood pressure control, and metabolic profile in elderly subjects: the Cocoa, Cognition, and Aging (CoCoA) Study – a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 101, 538–548.
27. Haddock, CK, Poston, WSC, LaGrotte, C et al. (2014) Findings from an online behavioural weight management programme provided with or without a fortified diet beverage. Br J Nutr 111, 372–379.
28. Serôdio, PM, McKee, M & Stuckler, D (2018) Coca-Cola – a model of transparency in research partnerships? A network analysis of Coca-Cola’s research funding (2008–2016). Public Health Nutr 21, 1594–1607.
29. Dickersin, K (1990) The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 263, 1385–1389.
30. Schick, SF & Glantz, SA (2007) Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement. Tob Control 16, 157–164.
31. Forsyth, SR, Odierna, DH, Krauth, D et al. (2014) Conflicts of interest and critiques of the use of systematic reviews in policymaking: an analysis of opinion articles. Syst Rev 3, 122.
32. Ruff, K (2015) Scientific journals and conflict of interest disclosure: what progress has been made? Environ Health 14, 45.
33. Baba, A, Cook, DM, McGarity, TO et al. (2005) Legislating ‘sound science’: the role of the tobacco industry. Am J Public Health 95, Suppl. 1, S20–S27.
34. Ong, EK & Glantz, SA (2001) Constructing ‘sound science’ and ‘good epidemiology’: tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms. Am J Public Health 91, 1749–1757.
35. Plos Medicine Editors (2012) PLoS Medicine series on Big Food: the food industry is ripe for scrutiny. PLoS Med 9, e1001246.
36. Simon, M (2011) Pepsico and public health: is the nation’s largest food company a model of corporate responsibility or master of public relations? CUNY Law Rev 15, issue 1, doi: 10.31641/clr150102.
37. Stuckler, D & Nestle, M (2012) Big food, food systems, and global health. PLoS Med 9, e1001242.