Skip to main content

Front-of-package nutrition references are positively associated with food processing

  • Anthea Christoforou (a1), Naomi Dachner (a1), Rena Mendelson (a2) and Valerie Tarasuk (a1)
Abstract Objective

Foods characterized by a high degree of processing are pervasive in the global food supply and concerns have been raised about their contribution to the escalating burden of diet-related disease. It has been suggested that the dominance of these products relates in part to their aggressive on-package marketing. The purpose of the present study was to assess the relationship between the extent and nature of front-of-package (FOP) nutrition references on products sold in Canadian supermarkets and the level of food processing.


FOP references were recorded from all packaged foods. Nutrition references were classified as ‘negative’ and ‘positive’ and further differentiated in terms of the use of regulated and unregulated text. Foods were coded for level of processing, using three different classification systems. Logistic and negative binomial regression analyses were conducted to assess associations.


Three large Toronto supermarkets, from the top Canadian food retailers.


Packaged foods (n 20 520).


Forty-one per cent of products had FOP nutrition references. Irrespective of the classification system considered, the most processed category comprised the greatest proportion of products and nearly half of these bore FOP references. Foods deemed most processed were more likely than less processed products to bear FOP references and regulated and unregulated references to negative ingredients, but they were equally or less likely to bear positive nutrition references, depending on the classification system.


The greater frequency of FOP nutrition references on heavily processed foods raises questions about the extent to which discretionary FOP labelling supports public health efforts to promote healthy eating.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Front-of-package nutrition references are positively associated with food processing
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Front-of-package nutrition references are positively associated with food processing
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Front-of-package nutrition references are positively associated with food processing
      Available formats
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Email
Hide All
1. Monteiro, CA, Moubarac, JC, Cannon, G et al. (2013) Ultra‐processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system. Obes Rev 14, Suppl. 2, 2128.
2. Moubarac, JC, Batal, M, Martins, APB et al. (2014) Processed and ultra-processed food products: consumption trends in Canada from 1938 to 2011. Can J Diet Pract Res 75, 1521.
3. Moubarac, JC, Batal, M, Louzada, ML et al. (2017) Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada. Appetite 108, 512520.
4. Monteiro, CA, Levy, RB, Claro, RM et al. (2011) Increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods and likely impact on human health: evidence from Brazil. Public Health Nutr 14, 513.
5. Stuckler, D, McKee, M, Ebrahim, S et al. (2012) Manufacturing epidemics: the role of global producers in increased consumption of unhealthy commodities including processed foods, alcohol, and tobacco. PLoS Med 9, e1001235.
6. Moodie, R, Stuckler, D, Monteiro, C et al. (2013) Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries. Lancet 381, 670679.
7. Poti, JM, Mendez, MA, Ng, SW et al. (2015) Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households? Am J Clin Nutr 101, 12511262.
8. Moubarac, JC, Martins, APB, Claro, RM et al. (2013) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and likely impact on human health. Evidence from Canada. Public Health Nutr 16, 22402248.
9. Steele, EM, Baraldi, LG, da Costa Louzada, ML et al. (2016) Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 6, e009892.
10. Eicher-Miller, HA, Fulgoni, VL & Keast, DR (2012) Contributions of processed foods to dietary intake in the US from 2003–2008: a report of the Food and Nutrition Science Solutions Joint Task Force of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, American Society for Nutrition, Institute of Food Technologists, and International Food Information Council. J Nutr 142, issue 11, 2065S2072S.
11. Canella, DS, Levy, RB, Martins, APB et al. (2014) Ultra-processed food products and obesity in Brazilian households (2008–2009). PLoS One 9, e92752.
12. Tavares, LF, Fonseca, SC, Rosa, MLG et al. (2012) Relationship between ultra-processed foods and metabolic syndrome in adolescents from a Brazilian Family Doctor Program. Public Health Nutr 15, 8287.
13. Moubarac, JC (2012) The big issue is ultra-processing. Sexing up ultra-processed products (Commentary). World Nutr 3, 6280.
14. Mallarino, C, Gómez, LF, González-Zapata, L et al. (2013) Advertising of ultra-processed foods and beverages: children as a vulnerable population. Rev Saude Publica 47, 10061010.
15. Health Canada (2015) Food labelling. (accessed September 2016).
16. Health Canada (2015) Consulting Canadians to modernize and improve food labels: what we heard. (accessed October 2016).
17. Schermel, A, Emrich, TE, Arcand, J et al. (2013) Nutrition marketing on processed food packages in Canada: 2010 Food Label Information Program. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 38, 666672.
18. Sacco, JE, Sumanac, D & Tarasuk, V (2013) Front-of-package references to fibre on foods in Canadian supermarkets highlight the need for increased nutrition knowledge among consumers. J Nutr Educ Behav 45, 518524.
19. Metcalfe, A & Elliott, C (2015) Differences in the nutritional content of baby and toddler foods with front-of-package nutrition claims issued by manufacturers v. governments/health organizations. Public Health Nutr 18, 7580.
20. Colby, SE, Johnson, L, Scheett, A et al. (2010) Nutrition marketing on food labels. J Nutr Educ Behav 42, 9298.
21. Dachner, N, Mendelson, R, Sacco, J et al. (2015) An examination of the nutrient content and on-package marketing of novel beverages. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 40, 191198.
22. Emrich, TE, Qi, Y, Cohen, JE et al. (2015) Front-of-pack symbols are not a reliable indicator of products with healthier nutrient profiles. Appetite 84, 148153.
23. Ricciuto, L, Ip, H & Tarasuk, V (2005) The relationship between price, amounts of saturated and trans fats, and nutrient content claims on margarines and oils. Can J Diet Pract Res 66, 252255.
24. Van Camp, D, de Souza Monteiro, DM & Hooker, NH (2012) Stop or go? How is the UK food industry responding to front-of-pack nutrition labels? Eur Rev Agric Econ 39, 821842.
25. Volkova, E & Mhurchu, CN (2015) The influence of nutrition labeling and point-of-purchase information on food behaviours. Curr Obes Rep 4, 1929.
26. Nestle, M & Ludwig, DS (2008) Can the food industry play a constructive role in the obesity epidemic? JAMA 300, 18081811.
27. World Health Organization (2003) Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series no. 916. Geneva: WHO.
28. Fischer, PW, Vigneault, M, Huang, R et al. (2009) Sodium food sources in the Canadian diet. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 34, 884892.
29. Garriguet, D (2008) Beverage consumption of Canadian adults. Health Rep 19, 2329.
30. Brisbois, TD, Marsden, SL, Anderson, GH et al. (2014) Estimated intakes and sources of total and added sugars in the Canadian diet. Nutrients 6, 18991912.
32. Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Levy, RB et al. (2012) The food system. Processing. The big issue for disease, good health, well-being. World Nutr 3, 527569.
33. International Food Information Council Foundation (2010) Understanding our food communications tool kit. (accessed August 2015).
34. Sumanac, D, Mendelson, R & Tarasuk, V (2013) Marketing whole grain breads in Canada via food labels. Appetite 62, 16.
35. Canadian Grocer (2009) Canadian Grocery Industry 2008: Executive Report. Toronto, ON: Rogers Media Publishing.
36. Institute of Medicine (2011) Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Promoting Healthier Choices [EA Wartella, AH Lichtenstein and CS Boon, editors]. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
37. Government of Canada (2003) Regulations amending the Food and Drug Regulations (nutrition labelling, nutrient content claims and health claims). The Canada Gazette, Part II 137, 154403.
38. Canadian Food Inspection Agency (2014) Guide to food labelling and advertising. (accessed September 2014).
39. Poti, J, Mendez, M, Ng, SW et al. (2015) Ultra-processed and ready-to-eat food and beverage purchases differ by race, education, and income in a longitudinal US study. FASEB J 29, 1 Suppl., 251252.
40. Eicher-Miller, HA, Fulgoni, VL & Keast, DR (2015) Energy and nutrient intakes from processed foods differ by sex, income status, and race/ethnicity of US adults. J Acad Nutr Diet 115, 907918.
41. Moubarac, JC, Parra, DC, Cannon, G et al. (2014) Food classification systems based on food processing: significance and implications for policies and actions: a systematic literature review and assessment. Curr Obes Rep 3, 256272.
42. Gardner, W, Mulvey, EP & Shaw, EC (1995) Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychol Bull 118, 392404.
43. Sodium Working Group (2010) Sodium Reduction Strategy for Canada: Recommendations of the Sodium Working Group. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada.
44. Canadian Council of Food and Nutrition (2013) Tracking Nutrition Trends: A 20-Year History. Mississauga, ON: CCFN.
45. Health Canada (2014) Lists of foods that have received Temporary Marketing Authorization Letters. (accessed July 2014).
46. Center for Science in the Public Interest (2015) Nutrition labeling for public health impact. (accessed September 2015).
47. Scrinis, G (2016) Reformulation, fortification and functionalization: Big Food corporations’ nutritional engineering and marketing strategies. J Peasant Stud 43, 1737.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Christoforou supplementary material
Table S1

 Word (21 KB)
21 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 152 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 507 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 15th June 2017 - 18th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.