Skip to main content
×
Home

The influence of gender, age, education and household size on meal preparation and food shopping responsibilities

  • Lee A Flagg (a1), Bisakha Sen (a2), Meredith Kilgore (a2) and Julie L Locher (a3)
Abstract
Abstract Objective

To examine the extent to which the gendered division of labour persists within households in the USA in regard to meal planning/preparation and food shopping activities.

Design

Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data.

Setting

2007–2008 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Subjects

Sub-sample of 3195 adults at least 20 years old who had a spouse or partner.

Results

Analyses revealed that the majority of women and men reported they shared in both meal planning/preparing and food shopping activities (meal planning/preparation: women 54 % and men 56 %; food shopping: women 60 % and men 57 %). Results from multinomial logistic regression analyses indicated that, compared with men, women were more likely to take primary responsibility than to share this responsibility and less likely to report having no responsibility for these tasks. Gender differences were observed for age/cohort, education and household size.

Conclusions

This study may have implications for public health nutritional initiatives and the well-being of families in the USA.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The influence of gender, age, education and household size on meal preparation and food shopping responsibilities
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The influence of gender, age, education and household size on meal preparation and food shopping responsibilities
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The influence of gender, age, education and household size on meal preparation and food shopping responsibilities
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email jlocher@uab.edu
References
Hide All
1. DeVault ML (1994) Feeding the Family: The Social Organization of Caring as Gendered Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. Carrington C (2000) No Place Like Home: Relationships and Family Life among Lesbians and Gay Men. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3. Locher JL, Robinson CO, Bailey FA et al. (2010) Disruptions in the organization of meal preparation and consumption among older cancer patients and their family caregivers. Psychooncology 19, 967974.
4. Bove CF, Sobal J & Rauschenbach BS (2003) Food choices among newly married couples: convergence, conflict, individualism, and projects. Appetite 40, 2541.
5. Wansink B (2007) Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think. New York: Bantam.
6. DeVault ML (1999) Comfort and struggle: emotion work in family life. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 561, 5263.
7. Cunningham M (2008) Changing attitudes toward the male breadwinner, female homemaker family model: influences of women's employment and education over the lifecourse. Soc Forces 87, 299323.
8. Bianchi SM, Milkie MA, Sayer LC et al. (2000) Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Soc Forces 79, 191228.
9. Waite LJ, Goldscheider FK & Witsberger C (1986) Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. Am Sociol Rev 51, 541554.
10. South SJ & Spitze G (1994) Housework in marital and nonmarital households. Am Sociol Rev 59, 327347.
11. Batalova JA & Cohen PN (2004) Premarital cohabitation and housework: couples in cross-national perspective. J Marriage Fam 64, 743755.
12. Brewster KL & Padavic I (2004) Change in gender-ideology, 1977–1996: the contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. J Marriage Fam 62, 477487.
13. Davis SN & Greenstein TN (2009) Gender ideology: components, predictors, and consequences. Annu Rev Sociol 35, 87105.
14. Fan PL & Marini MM (2000) Influences on gender-role attitudes during the transition to adulthood. Soc Sci Res 29, 258283.
15. Kroska A & Elman C (2009) Change in attitudes about employed mothers: exposure, interests, and gender ideology discrepancies. Soc Sci Res 38, 366382.
16. Jacobs JA & Gerson K (2009) The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Presser HB (2003) Working in a 24/7 Economy: Challenges for American Families. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18. Hochschild A (1989) The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking Penguin.
19. Corrigall EA & Konrad AM (2007) Gender role attitudes and careers: a longitudinal study. Sex Roles 56, 847855.
20. Lopata H (1991) Gender and social roles. In Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, pp. 229246 [JS Chafetz, editor]. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
21. Treas J & De Ruijter E (2008) Earnings and expenditures on household services in married and cohabiting unions. J Marriage Fam 70, 796805.
22. Devine CM, Jastran M, Jabs JA et al. (2006) ‘A lot of sacrifices’: work–family spillover and the food choice coping strategies of low wage employed parents. Soc Sci Med 63, 25912603.
23. Kucera B & McIntosh WA (1991) Family size as a determinant of children's dietary intake: a dilution model approach. Ecol Food Nutr 26, 127138.
24. Pyke K & Coltrane S (1996) Entitlement, obligation, and gratitude in family work. J Fam Issues 17, 6082.
25. Coltrane S (2004) Research on household labor: modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. J Marriage Fam 62, 12081233.
26. Sayer LC (2005) Gender, time and inequality: trends in women's and men's paid work, unpaid work and free time. Soc Forces 84, 285303.
27. Shelton BA & John D (1996) The division of household labor. Annu Rev Sociol 22, 299322.
28. Kroska A (2004) Divisions of domestic work revising and expanding the theoretical explanations. J Fam Issues 25, 890922.
29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2009) NHANES 2007–2008 public data general release file documentation. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2007-2008/generaldoc_e.htm (accessed April 2011).
30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) NHANES 2007–2008: Diet behavior and nutrition data documentation, codebook, and frequencies. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2007-2008/DBQ_E.htm (accessed April 2011).
31. Sanders AE (2010) A Latino advantage in oral health-related quality of life is modified by nativity status. Soc Sci Med 71, 205211.
32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2009) NHANES 2007–2008 demographic variables and sample weights data documentation, codebook, and frequencies. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2007-2008/DEMO_E.htm (accessed April 2011).
33. Hosmer D & Lemeshow S (2000) Special topics. In Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed., pp. 260351. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
34. Locher JL, Ritchie CS, Roth DL et al. (2009) Food choice among homebound older adults: motivations and perceived barriers. J Nutr Health Aging 13, 659664.
35. Settersten RA Jr & Ray B (2010) What's going on with young people today? The long and twisting path to adulthood. Future Child 20, 1941.
36. Brines J (1994) Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. Am J Sociol 100, 652688.
37. Bittman M, England P, Sayer L et al. (2003) When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. Am J Sociol 109, 186214.
38. Gupta S (2006) Her money, her time: women's earnings and their housework hours. Soc Sci Res 35, 975999.
39. Stevens DP, Minnotte KL, Mannon SE et al. (2006) Family work performance and satisfaction. Marriage Fam Rev 40, 4774.
40. Brown JL & Miller D (2002) Gender role preference and family food chores. J Nutr Educ Behav 34, 100108.
41. Blumberg RL (1988) Income under female versus male control: hypotheses from a theory of gender stratification and data from the third world. J Fam Issues 9, 5184.
42. McIntosh WA & Zey M (1998) Women as gatekeepers of food consumption: a sociological critique. In Food and Gender: Identity and Power, pp. 125144 [CM Counihan and SL Kaplan, editors]. New Delhi: Harwood Academic Publishers.
43. Becker GS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econ J 75, 493517.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 29
Total number of PDF views: 335 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 453 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.