Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Neural tube defects in Latin America and the impact of fortification: a literature review

  • Jorge Rosenthal (a1), Jessica Casas (a2), Douglas Taren (a2), Clinton J Alverson (a1), Alina Flores (a1) and Jaime Frias (a3)...
Abstract
Abstract Objective

Data on the prevalence of birth defects and neural tube defects (NTD) in Latin America are limited. The present review summarizes NTD prevalence and time trends in Latin American countries and compares pre- and post-fortification periods to assess the impact of folic acid fortification in these countries.

Design

We carried out a literature review of studies and institutional reports published between 1990 and 2010 that contained information on NTD prevalence in Latin America.

Results

NTD prevalence in Latin American countries varied from 0·2 to 9·6 per 1000 live births and was influenced by methods of ascertainment. Time trends from Bogota, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala City, Mexico and Puerto Rico showed average annual declines of 2·5 % to 21·8 %. Pre- and post-fortification comparisons were available for Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Puerto Rico and Mexico. The aggregate percentage decline in NTD prevalence ranged from 33 % to 59 %.

Conclusions

The present publication is the first to review data on time trends and the impact of folic acid fortification on NTD prevalence in Latin America. Reported NTD prevalence varied markedly by geographic region and in some areas of Latin America was among the lowest in the world, while in other areas it was among the highest. For countries with available information, time trends showed significant declines in NTD prevalence and these declines were greater in countries where folic acid fortification of staples reached the majority of the population at risk, such as Chile and Costa Rica.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Neural tube defects in Latin America and the impact of fortification: a literature review
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Neural tube defects in Latin America and the impact of fortification: a literature review
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Neural tube defects in Latin America and the impact of fortification: a literature review
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email jyr4@cdc.gov
References
Hide All
1. Black RE, Cousens S, Johnson HL et al. (2010) Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: a systematic analysis. Lancet 375, 19691987.
2. Christianson A, Howson C & Modell B (2006) Global Report on Birth Defects, the Hidden Toll of Dying and Disabled. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes Foundation.
3. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Modell B et al. (2010) Folic acid to reduce neonatal mortality from neural tube defects. Int J Epidemiol 39, i110i121.
4. Population Reference Bureau (2010) 2010 World Population Data Sheet, p. 18. http://www.prb.org/pdf10/10wpds_eng.pdf (accessed February 2013).
5. US Preventive Services Task Force (2009) Clinical Guidelines: Folic acid supplementation for the prevention of neural tube defects: an update of the evidence for the US preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 150, 632639.
6. Medical Research Council (1991) Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Lancet 338, 131137.
7. Berry RJ, Li Z, Erickson JD et al. (1999) Prevention of neural-tube defects with folic acid in China. China–US Collaborative Project for Neural Tube Defect Prevention. N Engl J Med 341, 14851490.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1999) Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep 48, issue RR-11, 140.
9. Castilla EE & Orioli IM (2004) ECLAMC: the Latin-American collaborative study of congenital malformations. Community Genet 7, 7694.
10. Benavides-Lara A, Barboza-Arguello MP & Umaña-Solis LM (2008) Manual técnico del Centro de Registro de Enfermedades Congénitas. Tres Ríos, Costa Rica: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud, Ministerio de Salud de Costa Rica.
11. International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Monitoring System (2006) Annual Report 2006 with data for 2004, p. 69. Rome: International Center of Birth Defects.
12. Mutchnick O, Lisker R & Babinsky V (1988) Programa mexicano de registro y vigilancia epidemiológica de malformaciones congénitas externas. Salad Publica Mex 30, 88100.
13. Departamento de Salud de Puerto Rico (2009) Informe Anual 2008 del Sistema de Vigilancia de Defectos Congénitos de Puerto Rico. San Juan, Puerto Rico: Departamento de Salud.
14. Secretariá de Salud & Comité Nacional para la Vigilancia Epidemiológica (2005) Manual de Procedimientos para la Vigilancia Epidemiológica de los Defectos del Tubo Neural, México. Mexico City: Secretaria de Salud/The National Center of Epidemiological Surveillance and Diseases Control (CENAVECE).
15. Calvo EB & Biglieri A (2008) Impacto de la fortificación con acido fólico sobre el estado nutricional en mujeres y la prevalencia de defectos del tubo neural. Arch Argent Pediatr 106, 492498.
16. Aguiar MJ, Campos AS, Aguiar RA et al. (2003) Neural tube defects and associated factors in liveborn and stillborn infants. J Pediatr (Rio de J) 79, 129134.
17. Daly L (1992) Simple SAS macros for the calculation of exact binomial and Poisson confidence limits. Comput Biol Med 22, 351361.
18. Price R (2000) Estimating the ratio of two Poisson rates. Comput Stat Data Anal 34, 345356.
19. Greenland S (1987) Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Epidemiol 125, 761768.
20. Pearce N (1989) Analytical implications of epidemiological concepts of interaction. Int J Epidemiol 17, 976980.
21. S AS Institute Inc. (1999) SAS/STATU User's Guide Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
22. International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (2008) Annual Report 2008 with data for 2006, pp. 7374. Rome: ICBDSR.
23. International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (2008) Annual Report 2008 with data for 2006, pp. 6773. Rome: ICBDSR.
24. Montalvo G, Camacho A, Toscano M, et al. (2006) Frecuencia de malformaciones congénitas en hospitales ecuatorianos de la red ECLAMC. Período Junio 2001–Junio 2005. Rev Med Cambios (Hospital Carlos Andrade Marin) V, 39–49; available at http://www.hcam.gob.ec/multimedia/revista/rcv5n9.pdf
25. Puerto Rico Department of Health (2010) Birth Defects Surveillance and Prevention System, Puerto Rico, 1996–2008. San Juan, Puerto Rico: Department of Health.
26. Mancebo-Hernández A, González-Rivera A, Díaz-Omaña L et al. (2008) Defectos del tubo neural. Panorama epidemiológico en México (I de II). Acta Pediatr Mex 29, 4147.
27. Acevedo CR, Alvarez SY, Anzueto ER, et al. (2004) Prevalencia de Anomalías Congénitas Mayores Externas de Recién Nacidos en Hospitales Nacionales y Regionales de Guatemala 2001–2003. Guatemala City: Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas.
28. Campaña H, Pawluk MS & Lopez-Camelo JS and ECLAMC Study Group (2010) Prevalencia al nacimientos de 27 anomalías congénitas seleccionadas en 7 regiones geográficas de Argentina. Arch Argent Pediatr 108, 409417.
29. Lopez-Camelo J, Castilla E & Orioli IM; INAGEMP and ECLAMC (2010) Folic acid flour fortification: impact on the frequencies of 52 congenital anomaly types in three South American countries. Am J Med Genet Part A 152A, 24442458.
30. Guardiola A, Koltermann V, Aguilar PM et al. (2009) Neurological congenital malformations in a tertiary hospital in South Brazil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 67, 807811.
31. Nascimiento LF (2008) Prevalencia de defeitos de fechamento de tubo neural no Vale do Paraiba, Sao Paulo. Rev Paul Pediatr 26, 372377.
32. Salguero-García EJ, Barrios-Ruiz AP, Cardona de León VK et al. (2009) Impacto de la norma de suplementación de acido fólico con relación a casos de defectos del tubo neural en recién nacidos. Estudio descriptivo del número de casos de recién nacidos con Defectos del Tubo Neural atendidos en Hospitales Nacionales y Maternidades Periféricas del Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social del departamento de Guatemala durante el período de 2004–2008. Guatemala City: Universidad de San Carlos.
33. Ortiz J & Kestler E (2006) Defectos del tubo neural en el Departamento de Guatemala. Revista del Colegio de Médicos y Cirujanos de Guatemala, Época IV 16, 2934.
34. David J (2004) Fortificacion de harina de trigo en América Latina y región del Caribe. Rev Chil Nutr 31, 336347.
35. Peña-Rosas JP & Sinclair BM (2007) Wheat flour fortification for prevention and control of iron deficiency anemia in Latin America. Rev Med Minas Gerais 17, 1/2 Suppl. I, S66S73.
36. Sanabria H & Tarqui C (2007) Fundamentos para la fortificacion de la harina de trigo con micronutrientes en el Peru. An Fac Med Lima 68, 185192.
37. Senado Uruguay (2006) Decreto de ley aprobado 130/06 sobre fortificacion de alimentos con micronutrientes. http://www.parlamento.gub.uy/htmlstat/sesiones/pdfs/camara/20061108d0059.pdf (accessed May 2010).
38. Fundacion Alimentaria de Centro América y Panamá (2009) Proyecto de Fortificacion Centroamericano de Alimentos con acido fólico y otros micronutrientes como bien publico regional. Reporte de resultado de evaluaciones. http://nutrinet.org/servicios/biblioteca-digital/Vitaminas-y-Minerales/Proyecto-de-Fortificacion-Centroamericana-de-Alimentos-con-Acido-Folico-y-otros-Micronutrientes-como-un-Bien-Publico-Regional (accessed January 2011).
39. Olney RS & Mulinare J (2002) Trends in neural tube defects, folic acid fortification, and vitamin supplement use. Semin Perinatol 26, 277285.
40. Lie RT (2006) An international perspective on anencephaly and spina bifida: prevalence by the turn of the century. In Neural Tube Defects from Origin to Treatment, pp. 117132 [DF Wyszynski, editor]. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Williams LJ, Rasmussen SA, Flores A et al. (2005) Decline in the prevalence of spina bifida and anencephaly by race/ethnicity: 1995–2002. Pediatrics 116, 580586.
42. Lix LM, Yogendran MS, Shaw SY et al. (2008) Population-based data sources for chronic disease surveillance. Chronic Dis Can 29, 3138.
43. Tairau F, De Wals P & Bastide A (2006) Validity of death and stillbirth certificates and hospital discharge summaries for the identification of neural tube defects in Quebec City. Chronic Dis Can 27, 120124.
44. Hexter AC, Harris JA & Roeper P (1990) Evaluation of the hospital discharge index and the birth certificate as sources of information on birth defects. Public Health Rep 105, 296307.
45. Mosley BS, Simmons CJ, Cleves MA et al. (2002) Regional bias in birth defect prevalence rates for Arkansas: influence of incomplete ascertainment along surveillance system borders. Teratology 66, Suppl. 1, S36S40.
46. Hexter AC & Harris JA (1991) Bias in congenital malformations information from the birth certificate. Teratology 44, 177180.
47. Pan American Health Organization (2002) Equity and Health: Views from the Pan American Sanitary Bureau. PAHO Occasional Publication no. 8. Washington, DC: PAHO; available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/9275122881.pdf#page=31
48. Imhoff-Kunsch B, Flores R, Dary O et al. (2007) Wheat flour fortification is unlikely to benefit the neediest in Guatemala. J Nutr 137, 101 71022.
49. Piloto Morejón M, Choconta Sanabria MI & Menendez Garcia R (2001) Prenatal diagnosis and medical care of congenital malformations and other genetic diseases. Rev Cuba Obstet Ginecol 27, 233240.
50. De Wals P, Tairou F, Van Allen M et al. (2007) Reduction in neural tube defects after folic acid fortification in Canada. N Engl J Med 357, 135142.
51. Berry RJ, Bailey L, Mulinare J et al.; Folic Acid Working Group (2010) Fortification of flour with folic acid. Food Nutr Bull 31, 1 Suppl., S22S35.
52. Tacsan CL & Ascencio Rivera M (2004) The Costa Rican experience: reduction of neural tube defects following food fortification programs. Nutr Rev 62, 6 Pt 2, S40S43.
53. Hertrampf E & Cortés F (2004) Folic acid fortification of wheat flour: Chile. Nutr Rev 62, 6 Pt 2, S44S48.
54. Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Mathews TJ et al. (2001) Impact of folic acid fortification of the US food supply on the occurrence of neural tube defects. JAMA 285, 29812986.
55. Ray JG, Meier C, Vermeulen MJ et al. (2002) Association of neural tube defects and folic acid fortification. Lancet 360, 20472048.
56. Chen BH, Carmichael SI, Selvin S et al. (2008) NTD prevalence in central California before and after folic acid fortification. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 82, 547552.
57. Llanos A, Hertrampf E, Cortes F et al. (2007) Cost-effectiveness of a folic acid fortification program in Chile. Health Policy 83, 295303.
58. Bentley TG, Weinstein MC, Willett WC et al. (2009) A cost-effectiveness analysis of folic acid fortification policy in the United States. Pubic Health Nutr 12, 455467.
59. Castilla EE, Orioli IM, Lopez-Camelo JS et al. (2003) Preliminary data on changes in neural tube defect prevalence rates after folic acid fortification in South America. Am J Med Genet A 123, 123128.
60. Pacheco SS, Souza AI, Vidal SDA et al. (2006) Neural tube defects prevalence in newborn infants in the Women Care Center of the Instituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando Figueira, IMIP: 2000–2004. Rev Bras Saude Materno Infantil 6, Suppl. 1, S35S42.
61. Pacheco SS, Braga C, Souza AI et al. (2009) Effects of folic acid fortification on the prevalence of neural tube defects. Rev Saude Publica 43, 16.
62. Costa CMDS (2006) Profile of the congenital malformations in a sample of births in city of Rio de Janeiro, 1999–2001. Cad Saude Publica (Rio de J) 22, 24232431.
63. Ramos-Guerra FA, Llerena JC, Nogueira de Nava SG et al. (2008) Defeitos congênitos no Municipio do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: uma avaliação através do SINASC (2000–2004). Cad Saude Publica (Rio de J) 24, 140149.
64. Ogata AJ, Camano L & Brunoni D (1992) Perinatal factors associated with neural tube defects (anencephaly [correction of anancephaly], spina bifida and encephalocele). Rev Paul Med 110, 147151.
65. Monteleone-Neto R & Castilla EE (1994) Apparently normal frequency of congenital anomalies in the highly polluted town of Cubatao, Brazil. Am J Med Genet 52, 319323.
66. Borrelli M, Mendes ETR, Randi J et al. (2005) Prevenção de defeitos de fechamento do tubo neural pela administração de ácido fólico û desafio da saúde. Arq Med ABC 30, 4447.
67. Nazer J, Cifuentes L, Rodríguez M et al. (2001) Central nervous system malformations in Chilean hospitals participating in the Latin American Collaborative Study of ongenital Malformations (ECLAMC). Rev Med Chile 129, 11631170.
68. Nazer J (2002) Anomalías congénitas estructurales en el recién nacido (segunda parte). Rev Hosp Clin Univ Chile 13, 294305.
69. Nazer J, Cifuentes L, Aguila A et al. (2007) Effects of folic acid fortification in the rates of malformations at birth in Chile. Rev Med Chile 135, 198204.
70. Cortés F, Mellado C, Hertrampf E et al. (2001) Frequency of neural tube defects in public maternity during 1999 in Santiago, Chile. Rev Med Chile 129, 277284.
71. Hertrampf E & Cortes F (2008) National food-fortification program with folic acid in Chile. Food Nutr Bull 29, 1 Suppl., S231S237.
72. Lopez-Camelo JS, Orioli IM, da Graca Dutra M et al. (2005) Reduction of birth prevalence rates of neural tube defects after folic acid fortification in Chile. Am J Med Genet Part A 135, 120125.
73. Garcia H, Salguero A, Moreno J et al. (2003) Frecuencia de anomalías congénitas en el Instituto Materno Infantil de Bogotá. Biomédica (Bogotá) 23, 161172.
74. Zarante I, Franco L, Lopez C et al. (2010) Frecuencia de malformaciones congénitas: evaluacion y pronostico de 52,744 nacimientos en tres ciudades colombianas. Biomédica (Bogotá) 30, 6571.
75. Monsalve AM, Londoño IC, Ocampo J et al. (2007) Distribución geográfica en Cali, Colombia de malformaciones congénitas. Hospital Universitario del Valle, marzo de 2004-febrero de 2005. Rev Colombia Med 38, 4751.
76. Ostos H, Astaiza G, Garcia F et al. (2000) Disminución de la incidencia de defectos de cierre del tubo neural en un hospital Universitario de Neiva: posible efecto de la promoción del consumo de acido fólico. Biomédica (Bogotá) 20, 1824.
77. Umaña L Registro de Malformaciones Congenitas de Costa Rica (2009) Centro de Registro Enfermedades Congénitas de Costa Rica. Tres Ríos, Costa Rica: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud, Ministerio de Salud de Costa Rica.
78. International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (2006) Annual Report 2006 with data for 2004, pp. 6970. Rome: ICBDSR.
79. Orraca-Castillo M, Iglesias P, Hernández G et al. (2004) Los defectos del cierre del tubo neural, 1994–1998, Piñar del Rio. CIGET 6, 1519.
80. Oteiza M, Perez M, Alvarez R et al. (2005) Comportamiento clínico-epidemiologico de los defectos congénitos en la Ciudad de la Habana. Rev Cubana Pediatr 75, 7578.
81. Dominican Republic Ministry of Health (2008) CDC's Report to the World Bank on Neural Tube Defect Prevalence in the Dominican Republic. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Ministry of Health.
82. Jáquez M, Jáquez F, Soriano GM et al. (1990) Registro dominicano de malformaciones congénitas (REDOMALCO): resultados de 1989. Arch Domin Pediatr 26, 5158.
83. Milla G, Umaña E & Mayes I (2002) Reporte de la Prevalencia Hospitalaria de Malformaciones Congénitas en Honduras. San Pedro Sula, Honduras: Proyecto de Niños Saludables.
84. Hernández R & Alvarenga R (2001) Frecuencia de malformaciones congénitas externas en recién nacidos de la unidad materno infantil del Hospital Escuela. Factores de Riesgo. Rev Med Post INAH 6, 148153.
85. Mutchinick O (1995) Epidemiologia de malformaciones congénitas. Gac Med Mex 131, 15211560.
86. Mutchinick O, Orozco E, Lisker R et al. (1990) Factores de riesgo asociados a los defectos del tubo neural durante el primer trimestre de la gestación. Gac Med Mex 126, 227233.
87. International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (2006) Annual Report 2006 with data for 2004, pp. 198204. Rome: ICBDSR.
88. International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (2008) Annual Report 2008 with data for 2006, pp. 169174. Rome: ICBDSR.
89. Hernández-Arriaga JL, Cortes Gallo G, Aldana Valenzuela C et al. (1991) Incidencia de malformaciones congénitas externas en el Hospital de Gineco-Pediatría de lLeón, Guanajuato. Bol Med Hosp Infantil Mex 48, 717721.
90. Alfaro-Alfaro N, Prado Aguilar CLZ, López Zermeño MC et al. (1994) Malformaciones congénitas en 75,788 nacimientos consecutivos en cuatro hospitales de Guadalajara, México. Perinatol Reprod Hum 8, 91100.
91. Pérez-Molina JJ & Alfaro-Alfaro M (1998) Defectos del cierre del tubo neural: prevalencia y búsqueda de asociación con algunos factores de riesgo durante el primer trimestre del embarazo. Bol Med Hosp Infantil Mex 55, 435442.
92. Alfaro-Alfaro N, Perez-Molina J, Meza-Lopez V et al. (2001) Defectos del tubo neural altos y bajos al nacer en el Hospital Civil ‘Juan I. Menchaca’. Cir Ciruj 69, 232235.
93. Alfaro NA, Molina JP, Figueroa IV et al. (2004) Malformaciones congénitas externas en la zona metropolitana de Guadalajara. 10 años de estudio. Universidad de Guadalajara, Investigación en Salud 6, 180187.
94. Valdés M, Blanco A, Esther M, Kofman S et al. (1997) Defectos congénitos en el Hospital General de México. Frecuencia observada durante 10 años mediante el RYVEMCE. Rev Med Hosp Gen Mex 60, 181187.
95. Arredondo de Arreola G, Rodriguez-Bonito R, Treviño-Alanis MG et al. (1990) Malformaciones congénitas en recién nacidos vivos. Bol Med Hosp Infantil Mex 47, 822827.
96. Hernández Herrera R, Alcala-Galvan L & Flores-Santos R (2008) Prevalencia de defectos del tubo neural en 248352 nacimientos consecutivos. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 46, 201204.
97. Rodríguez García R, Urbina Gutiérrez A, Muñoz Delgado M et al. (1998) Prevalencia de defectos del tubo neural en el sur de Veracruz. Bol Med Hosp Infantil Mex 55, 257261.
98. Macías Flores MA & Cuevas ML (2000) Registro y vigilancia epidemiológica de malformaciones congénitas externas en Zacatecas durante veinte años. Genética y Biomedicina Molecular 2000, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México, 15–21 de Octubre 2000. Revista de Salud Pública y Nutrición issue 2; available at http://www.respyn.uanl.mx/especiales/genetica/epidemiologia_clinica.html
99. Tarqui-Mamani C, Sanabria H, Lam N et al. (2009) Incidencia de los defectos del tubo neural en el Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal de Lima. Rev Chil Salud Publica 12, 8289.
100. International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (2006) Annual Report 2006 with data for 2004, pp. 235241. Rome: ICBDSR.
101. International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (2008) Annual Report 2006 with data for 2006, pp. 207213. Rome: ICBDSR.
102. Castilla EE, López Camelo J, Dutra GP et al. (1991) Birth defects monitoring in developing countries: an example from Uruguay. Int J Risk Saf Med 2, 271288.
103. Pérez Y (2003) Factores epidemiológicos y defectos del tubo neural. http://bibmed.ucla.edu.ve/DB/bmucla/edocs/textocompleto/TWL101P472003.pdf (accessed May 2009).
104. Moreno-Fuenmayor H, Valera V, Socorro Candanonza L et al. (1996) Programa preventivo de defectos al nacimientos en Maracaibo, Maracaibo,Venezuela, periodo 1993–1996. Invest Clin 37, 271278.
105. Simoes-Campos M, Cedeño Rincón R, Romero-Tovar T et al. (2000) Incidencia de malformaciones congénitas en un Hospital Materno Infantil en Venezuela 5, Series III, 281–290.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 163 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 419 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.