Drazen, JM (2015) Revisiting the commercial–academic interface. N Engl J Med
Rosenbaum, L (2015) Understanding bias – the case for careful study. N Engl J Med
Rosenbaum, L (2015) Beyond moral outrage – weighing the trade-offs of COI regulation. N Engl J Med
Chew, M, Brizzell, C, Abbasi, K
et al. (2014) Medical journals and industry ties. BMJ
Godlee, F (2015) Authors’ reply to Smith, Forsyth, Coffey and Prendergast, and Soskolne. BMJ
Horton, R (2015) Offline: the BMJ vs NEJM – lessons for us all. Lancet
Abbasi, K (2014) Why transparency isn’t an unassailable philosophical principle. J R Soc Med
Wilson, M (2014) Is transparency really a panacea?
J R Soc Med
Luiten, CM, Steenhuis, IHM, Eyles, H
et al. (2016) Ultra-processed foods have the worst nutrient profile, yet they are the most available packaged products in a sample of New Zealand supermarkets. Public Health Nutr
Rich, K (2015) Comment on: ‘Ultra-processed foods have the worst nutrient profile, yet they are the most available packaged products in a sample of New Zealand supermarkets’ by Luiten et al. (Letter to the Editor). Public Health Nutr
Waterlander, WE, Luiten, CM, Eyles, H
et al. (2015) Response to two Letters to the Editor: we maintain that ultra-processed supermarket foods are less healthy than their minimally processed counterparts (Letter to the Editor). Public Health Nutr
Mackerras, D (2015) Comment on Luiten et al.’s paper: ‘Ultra-processed foods have the worst nutrient profile, yet they are the most available packaged products in a sample of New Zealand supermarkets’ (Letter to the Editor). Public Health Nutr
Kesselheim, AS, Robertson, CT, Myers, JA
et al. (2012) A randomized study of how physicians interpret research funding disclosures. N Engl J Med
Lesser, LI, Ebbeling, CB, Goozner, M
et al. (2007) Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. PLoS Med
Bes-Rastrollo, M, Schulze, MB, Ruiz-Canela, M
et al. (2013) Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. PLoS Med
Massougbodji, J, Le Bodo, Y, Fratu, R
et al. (2014) Reviews examining sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight: correlates of their quality and conclusions. Am J Clin Nutr
Brandt, AM (2012) Inventing conflicts of interest: a history of tobacco industry tactics. Am J Public Health
Oreskes, N & Conway, EM (2010) Merchants of Doubt. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
Brownell, KD & Warner, KE (2009) The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food?
Kearns, CE, Glantz, SA & Schmidt, LA (2015) Sugar industry influence on the scientific agenda of the National Institute of Dental Research’s 1971 National Caries Program: a historical analysis of internal documents. PLoS Med
Nestle, M (2015) Soda Politics: Taking on Big Soda (and Winning). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hager, N (2014) Dirty Politics: How Attack Politics Is Poisoning New Zealand’s Political Environment. Nelson, NZ: Craig Potton Publishing.
Gillie, O (2015) Controlled trials of vitamin D, causality and type 2 statistical error. Public Health Nutr
Autier, PBM, Pizot, C & Mullie, P (2013) Vitamin D status and ill health: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
Bolland, MJ, Grey, A, Gamble, GD
et al. (2014) The effect of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal, vascular, or cancer outcomes: a trial sequential meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
Gillie, O (2015) Vitamin D, causation, conflict of interest, and other issues – Corrigendum. Public Health Nutr
Rothman, K (1993) Conflict of interest: the new McCarthyism in science. JAMA