Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

On the pitfalls of disclosure statements

  • Marilyn Tseng, Allison Hodge, Carl Lachat, Stefanie Vandevijvere and Eduardo Villamor...
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      On the pitfalls of disclosure statements
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      On the pitfalls of disclosure statements
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      On the pitfalls of disclosure statements
      Available formats
      ×
Abstract
Copyright
References
Hide All
1. Drazen, JM (2015) Revisiting the commercial–academic interface. N Engl J Med 372, 18531854.
2. Rosenbaum, L (2015) Understanding bias – the case for careful study. N Engl J Med 372, 19591963.
3. Rosenbaum, L (2015) Beyond moral outrage – weighing the trade-offs of COI regulation. N Engl J Med 372, 20642068.
4. Chew, M, Brizzell, C, Abbasi, K et al. (2014) Medical journals and industry ties. BMJ 349, g7197.
5. Godlee, F (2015) Authors’ reply to Smith, Forsyth, Coffey and Prendergast, and Soskolne. BMJ 350, h42.
6. Horton, R (2015) Offline: the BMJ vs NEJM – lessons for us all. Lancet 385, 2238.
7. Abbasi, K (2014) Why transparency isn’t an unassailable philosophical principle. J R Soc Med 107, 215.
8. Wilson, M (2014) Is transparency really a panacea? J R Soc Med 107, 216217.
9. Luiten, CM, Steenhuis, IHM, Eyles, H et al. (2016) Ultra-processed foods have the worst nutrient profile, yet they are the most available packaged products in a sample of New Zealand supermarkets. Public Health Nutr 19, 530538.
10. Fairfax New Zealand Limited (2015) NZ packaged food ultra-processed, unhealthy. Stuff, 30 July 2015. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/70642530/nz-packaged-food-ultraprocessed-unhealthy (accessed November 2015).
11. Scoop Media (2015) Majority of our packaged foods unhealthy. Scoop Independent News, 30 July 2015. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/GE1507/S00131/majority-of-our-packaged-foods-unhealthy.htm (accessed November 2015).
12. Xinhua, english.news.cn (2015) New Zealand supermarkets stocking ‘unhealthiest food available’: study. Xinhua News, 30 July 2015. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-07/30/c_134464084.htm (accessed November 2015).
13. Rich, K (2015) Comment on: ‘Ultra-processed foods have the worst nutrient profile, yet they are the most available packaged products in a sample of New Zealand supermarkets’ by Luiten et al. (Letter to the Editor). Public Health Nutr 19, 564569.
14. Waterlander, WE, Luiten, CM, Eyles, H et al. (2015) Response to two Letters to the Editor: we maintain that ultra-processed supermarket foods are less healthy than their minimally processed counterparts (Letter to the Editor). Public Health Nutr 19, 571573.
15. Mackerras, D (2015) Comment on Luiten et al.’s paper: ‘Ultra-processed foods have the worst nutrient profile, yet they are the most available packaged products in a sample of New Zealand supermarkets’ (Letter to the Editor). Public Health Nutr 19, 570.
16. Kesselheim, AS, Robertson, CT, Myers, JA et al. (2012) A randomized study of how physicians interpret research funding disclosures. N Engl J Med 367, 11191127.
17. Lesser, LI, Ebbeling, CB, Goozner, M et al. (2007) Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. PLoS Med 4, e5.
18. Bes-Rastrollo, M, Schulze, MB, Ruiz-Canela, M et al. (2013) Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. PLoS Med 10, e1001578.
19. Massougbodji, J, Le Bodo, Y, Fratu, R et al. (2014) Reviews examining sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight: correlates of their quality and conclusions. Am J Clin Nutr 99, 10961104.
20. Brandt, AM (2012) Inventing conflicts of interest: a history of tobacco industry tactics. Am J Public Health 102, 6371.
21. Oreskes, N & Conway, EM (2010) Merchants of Doubt. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
22. Gillis, J & Schwartz, J (2015) Deeper ties to corporate cash for doubtful climate researcher. The New York Times, 21 February 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html (accessed November 2015).
23. Brownell, KD & Warner, KE (2009) The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food? Milbank Q 87, 259294.
24. Kearns, CE, Glantz, SA & Schmidt, LA (2015) Sugar industry influence on the scientific agenda of the National Institute of Dental Research’s 1971 National Caries Program: a historical analysis of internal documents. PLoS Med 12, e1001798.
25. Nestle, M (2015) Soda Politics: Taking on Big Soda (and Winning). New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Hager, N (2014) Dirty Politics: How Attack Politics Is Poisoning New Zealand’s Political Environment. Nelson, NZ: Craig Potton Publishing.
27. New Zealand Food & Grocery Council (2015) More food activist research from Auckland University. http://www.fgc.org.nz/media/more-food-activist-research-from-auckland-university (accessed November 2015).
28. Gillie, O (2015) Controlled trials of vitamin D, causality and type 2 statistical error. Public Health Nutr 19, 409414.
29. Autier, PBM, Pizot, C & Mullie, P (2013) Vitamin D status and ill health: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2, 7689.
30. Bolland, MJ, Grey, A, Gamble, GD et al. (2014) The effect of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal, vascular, or cancer outcomes: a trial sequential meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2, 307320.
31. Gillie, O (2015) Vitamin D, causation, conflict of interest, and other issues – Corrigendum. Public Health Nutr 19, 415416.
32. Rothman, K (1993) Conflict of interest: the new McCarthyism in science. JAMA 269, 27822784.
33. Fletcher, R & Ferris, L, the WAME Publication Ethics and Editorial Policy Committees (2009) Conflict of interest in peer-reviewed medical journals. http://www.wame.org/about/conflict-of-interest-in-peer-reviewed-medical (accessed December 2015).
34. Committee on Publication Ethics (2015) COPE consultation/guidance document on handling competing interests. http://publicationethics.org/forum-discussion-topic-comments-please-5 (accessed December 2015).
35. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2015) Author responsibilities – conflicts of interest. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities--conflicts-of-interest.html (accessed December 2015).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed