Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Perceived and objective diet quality in US adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)

  • Tiffany M Powell-Wiley (a1) (a2), Paige E Miller (a2) (a3), Priscilla Agyemang (a1), Tanya Agurs-Collins (a4) and Jill Reedy (a2) (a3)...
Abstract
Abstract Objective

The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern has been shown to reduce cardiometabolic risk. Little is understood about the relationship between objective diet quality and perceived diet quality (PDQ), a potential psychosocial barrier to appropriate dietary intake. We compared PDQ and diet quality measured by a nutrient-based DASH index score in the USA.

Design

Cross-sectional study. Participants in the 2005–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) rated diet quality on a 5-point Likert scale and PDQ scores were generated (low, medium, high). A single 24 h dietary recall was used to estimate DASH index scores (range 0–9 points) by assigning 0, 0·5 or 1 point (optimal) for nine target nutrients: total fat, saturated fat, protein, cholesterol, fibre, Ca, Mg, K and Na.

Setting

Nationally representative sample of the US population.

Subjects

Adults aged ≥19 years in 2005–2006 NHANES (n 4419).

Results

Participants with high PDQ (33 %) had higher DASH index scores (mean 3·0 (sd 0·07)) than those with low PDQ (mean 2·5 (sd 0·06), P < 0·001), but average scores did not align with targets for intermediate or optimal DASH accordance. Adults with high PDQ reported higher total fat, saturated fat and Na intakes compared with optimal DASH nutrient goals. Differences between those with high v. low PDQ were similar for Whites and Blacks, but there was no difference between PDQ groups for Mexican Americans.

Conclusions

Among Whites and Blacks, but not Mexican Americans, high PDQ may be associated with higher diet quality, but not necessarily a diet meeting DASH nutrient goals. This disconnect between PDQ and actual diet quality may serve as a target in obesity prevention.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Perceived and objective diet quality in US adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Perceived and objective diet quality in US adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Perceived and objective diet quality in US adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email tiffany.powell@nih.gov
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1. KM Flegal , MD Carroll , BK Kit et al. (2012) Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA 307, 491497.

2. YC Wang , K McPherson , T Marsh et al. (2011) Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet 378, 815825.

3. S Sidney , WD Rosamond , VJ Howard et al. (2013) The ‘Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics–2013 Update’ and the need for a national cardiovascular surveillance system. Circulation 127, 2123.

4. KM Flegal , BK Kit , H Orpana et al. (2013) Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 309, 7182.

5. PM Guenther , KW Dodd , J Reedy et al. (2006) Most Americans eat much less than recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 13711379.

6. JL Bachman , J Reedy , AF Subar et al. (2008) Sources of food group intakes among the US population, 2001–2002. J Am Diet Assoc 108, 804814.

7. SM Krebs-Smith , PM Guenther , AF Subar et al. (2010) Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. J Nutr 140, 18321838.

11. SI Kirkpatrick , KW Dodd , J Reedy et al. (2012) Income and race/ethnicity are associated with adherence to food-based dietary guidance among US adults and children. J Acad Nutr Diet 112, 624635.e6.

12. JD Wright & CY Wang (2011) Awareness of federal dietary guidance in persons aged 16 years and older: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005–2006. J Am Diet Assoc 111, 295300.

13. GS Lovasi , MA Hutson , M Guerra et al. (2009) Built environments and obesity in disadvantaged populations. Epidemiol Rev 31, 720.

14. AV Diez Roux & C Mair (2010) Neighborhoods and health. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1186, 125145.

15. CD Rehm , P Monsivais & A Drewnowski (2011) The quality and monetary value of diets consumed by adults in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 94, 13331339.

16. AR Shaikh , AL Yaroch , L Nebeling et al. (2008) Psychosocial predictors of fruit and vegetable consumption in adults a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 34, 535543.

17. J Brug , P Van Assema , G Kok et al. (1994) Self rated dietary fat intake: association with objective assessement of fat psychosocial factors, and intention to change. J Nutr Educ 26, 218223.

18. JN Variyam , Y Shim & J Blaylock (2001) Consumer misperceptions of diet quality. J Nutr Educ 33, 314321.

19. L Lechner , J Brug & H De Vries (1997) Misconceptions of fruit and vegetable consumption: differences between objective and subjective estimation of intake. J Nutr Educ 29, 313320.

20. LJ Appel , TJ Moore , E Obarzanek et al. (1997) A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 336, 11171124.

21. NM Karanja , E Obarzanek , PH Lin et al. (1999) Descriptive characteristics of the dietary patterns used in the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Trial. DASH Collaborative Research Group. J Am Diet Assoc 99, 8 Suppl., S19S27.

22. FM Sacks , LP Svetkey , WM Vollmer et al. (2001) Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 344, 310.

23. LJ Appel , MW Brands , SR Daniels et al. (2006) Dietary approaches to prevent and treat hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension 47, 296308.

24. LP Svetkey , VJ Stevens , PJ Brantley et al. (2008) Comparison of strategies for sustaining weight loss: the weight loss maintenance randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299, 11391148.

25. AL Gunther , AD Liese , RA Bell et al. (2009) Association between the dietary approaches to hypertension diet and hypertension in youth with diabetes mellitus. Hypertension 53, 612.

27. TT Fung , SE Chiuve , ML McCullough et al. (2008) Adherence to a DASH-style diet and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in women. Arch Intern Med 168, 713720.

28. PB Mellen , SK Gao , MZ Vitolins et al. (2008) Deteriorating dietary habits among adults with hypertension: DASH dietary accordance, NHANES 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Arch Intern Med 168, 308314.

33. G Johansson , A Wikman , AM Ahren et al. (2001) Underreporting of energy intake in repeated 24-hour recalls related to gender, age, weight status, day of interview, educational level, reported food intake, smoking habits and area of living. Public Health Nutr 4, 919927.

36. AM Brownawell & MC Falk (2010) Cholesterol: where science and public health policy intersect. Nutr Rev 68, 355364.

37. LJ Appel , SY Angell , LK Cobb et al. (2012) Population-wide sodium reduction: the bumpy road from evidence to policy. Ann Epidemiol 22, 417425.

38. DM Lloyd-Jones , Y Hong , D Labarthe et al. (2010) Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association's strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation 121, 586613.

42. W Willett (1998) Nutritional Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.

43. MA Espeland , S Kumanyika , AC Wilson et al. (2001) Statistical issues in analyzing 24-hour dietary recall and 24-hour urine collection data for sodium and potassium intakes. Am J Epidemiol 153, 9961006.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 104 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 214 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.