Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Phytotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

  • Timothy J Wilt (a1), Areef Ishani (a1), Indulis Rutks (a1) and Roderick MacDonald (a1)

To systematically review the existing evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of phytotherapeutic compounds used to treat men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).


Randomized trials were identified searching MEDLINE (1966–1997), EMBASE, Phytodok, the Cochrane Library, bibliographies of identified trials and review articles, and contact with relevant authors and drug companies. The studies were included if men had symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, the intervention was a phytotherapeutic preparation alone or combined, a control group received placebo or other pharmacologic therapies for BPH, and the treatment duration was at least 30 days. Key data were extracted independently by two investigators.


A total of 44 studies of six phytotherapeutic agents (Serenoa repens, Hypoxis rooperi, Secale cereale, Pygeum africanum, Urtica dioica, Curcubita pepo) met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Many studies did not report results in a method allowing meta-analysis. Serenoa repens, extracted from the saw palmetto, is the most widely used phytotherapeutic agent for BPH. A total of 18 trials involving 2939 men were reviewed. Compared with men receiving placebo, men taking Serenoa repens reported greater improvement of urinary tract symptoms and flow measures. Serenoa repens decreased nocturia (weighted mean difference (WMD)=−0.76 times per evening; 95% CI=−1.22 to −0.32; n=10 studies) and improved peak urine flow (WMD=1.93 ml s−1; 95% CI=0.72 to 3.14, n=8 studies). Men treated with Serenoa repens rated greater improvement of their urinary tract symptoms versus men taking placebo (risk ratio of improvement=1.72; 95% CI=1.21 to 2.44, n=8 studies). Improvement in symptoms of BPH was comparable to men receiving the finasteride. Hypoxis rooperi (n=4 studies, 519 men) was also demonstrated to be effective in improving symptom scores and flow measures compared with placebo. For the two studies reporting the International Prostate Symptom Score, the WMD was −4.9 IPSS points (95% CI=−6.3 to −3.5, n=2 studies) and the WMD for peak urine flow was 3.91 ml s−1 (95% CI=0.91 to 6.90, n=4 studies). Secale cereale (n=4 studies, 444 men) was found to modestly improve overall urological symptoms. Pygeum africanum (n=17 studies, 900 men) may be a useful treatment option for BPH. However, review of the literature has found inadequate reporting of outcomes which currently limit the ability to estimate its safety and efficacy. The studies involving Urtica dioica and Curcubita pepo are limited although these agents may be effective combined with other plant extracts such as Serenoa and Pygeum. Adverse events due to phytotherapies were reported to be generally mild and infrequent.


Randomized studies of Serenoa repens, alone or in combination with other plant extracts, have provided the strongest evidence for efficacy and tolerability in treatment of BPH in comparison with other phytotherapies. Serenoa repens appears to be a useful option for improving lower urinary tract symptoms and flow measures. Hypoxis rooperi and Secale cereale also appear to improve BPH symptoms although the evidence is less strong for these products. Pygeum africanum has been studied extensively but inadequate reporting of outcomes limits the ability to conclusively recommend it. There is no convincing evidence supporting the use of Urtica dioica or Curcubita pepo alone for treatment of BPH. Overall, phytotherapies are less costly, well tolerated and adverse events are generally mild and infrequent. Future randomized controlled trials using standardized preparations of phytotherapeutic agents with longer study durations are needed to determine their long-term effectiveness in the treatment of BPH.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Phytotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Phytotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Phytotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia
      Available formats
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1 FC Lowe , JC Ku . Phytotherapy in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a critical review. Urology 1996; 48: 1220.

3 E. Ernst Harmless herbs? A review of the recent literature. Am. J. Med. 1998; 104: 170–8.

5 G Bales , AP Christiano , E Kirsh , GS Gerber . Phytotherapeutic agents in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms: a demographic analysis of awareness and use at the University of Chicago. Urology 1999; 54: 8689.

6 FC Lowe , K Dreikorn , A Borkowski , J Braeckman , L Denis , P Ferrari Review of recent placebo-controlled trials utilizing phytotherapeutic agents for treatment of BPH. Prostate 1998; 37: 187–93.

8 CD Mulrow . Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994; 309: 597–9.

10 C. Marwick Growing use of medicinal botanicals forces assessment by drug regulators. JAMA 1995; 273: 607–9.

13 TJ Wilt , A Ishani , G Stark , R MacDonald , J Lau , C. Mulrow Saw palmetto extracts for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review. JAMA 1998; 280: 1604–9.

16 BE Carbin , B Larsson , O. Lindahl Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with phytosterols. Br. J. Urol. 1990; 66: 639–41.

17 JC Carraro , JP Raynaud , G Koch , GD Chisholm , F Di Silverio , P Teillac , . Comparison of phytotherapy (Permixon) with finasteride in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: a randomized international study of 1098 patients. Prostate 1996; 29: 231–40.

18 G Champault , JC Patel , AM Bonnard . A double-blind trial of an extract of the plant Serenoa repens in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1984; 18: 461–2.

26 H Metzker , M Kieser , U. Hölscher Wirksamkeit eines Sabal–Urtica-kombinationspräparats bei der behandlung der benignen prostatahyperplasie (BPH). Urologe B 1996; 36: 292300.

28 H Reece Smith , A Memon , CJ Smart , K. Dewbury The value of permixon in benign prostatic hypertrophy. Br. J. Urol. 1986; 58: 3640.

30 J Sokeland , J. Albrecht Kombination aus Sabal und Urticaestrakt vs. finasterid bei BPH (Stad. I bis II nach Alken); Vergleich der therapeutischen wirksamkeit in einer einjahrigen doppelblindstudie. Urologe A 1997; 36: 327–33.

32 P Boyle , AL Gould , CG Roehrborn . Prostate volume predicts outcome of treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with finasteride: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Urology 1996; 48: 398405.

33 JD McConnell , R Bruskewitz , P Walsh , G Andriole , M Lieber , L Holtgrewe The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998; 338: 557–63.

34 RR Berges , J Windeler , HJ Trampisch , TH Senge . Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of β-sitosterol in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Lancet 1995; 345: 1529–32.

37 KF Klippel , DM Hiltl , B. Schipp A multicentric, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of β-sitosterol (phytosterol) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br. J. Urol. 1997; 80: 427–32.

40 AC Buck . Phytotherapy for the prostate. Br. J. Urol. 1996; 78: 325–6.

43 S Nakase , K Takenaka , T Hamanaka , M. Kimura Effects of Cernilton pollen-extract on the urethral smooth muscle and diaphragmatic neuromuscular specimen. Folio Pharmacol. Jpn. 1988; 91: 385–92.

45 AC Buck , R Cox , RWM Rees , L Ebeling , A. John Treatment of outflow tract obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia with the pollen-extract, Cernilton: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Br. J. Urol. 1990; 66: 398404.

46 S. Dutkiewicz Usefulness of Cernilton in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 1984; 28: 4953.

48 MC Andro , JP Riffaud . Pygeum africanum for the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review of 25 years of published experience. Curr. Ther. Res. 1995; 56: 796817.

64 U Englemann , G Boos , H. Kres Therapie der benignen Prostatahyperplasie mit Bazoton liquidum. Urologe B 1996; 36: 287–91.

66 DE McKinney . Re: Saw palmetto for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. JAMA 1999; 281:1699.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 273 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 526 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.