Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability

  • Angie Clonan (a1), Paul Wilson (a2), Judy A Swift (a3), Didier G Leibovici (a4) and Michelle Holdsworth (a1)...

Abstract

Objective

Higher intakes of red and processed meat are associated with poorer health outcomes and negative environmental impacts. Drawing upon a population survey the present paper investigates meat consumption behaviours, exploring perceived impacts for human health, animal welfare and the environment.

Design

Structured self-completion postal survey relating to red and processed meat, capturing data on attitudes, sustainable meat purchasing behaviour, red and processed meat intake, plus sociodemographic characteristics of respondents.

Setting

Urban and rural districts of Nottinghamshire, East Midlands, UK, drawn from the electoral register.

Subjects

UK adults (n 842) aged 18–91 years, 497 females and 345 males, representing a 35·6 % response rate from 2500 randomly selected residents.

Results

Women were significantly more likely (P<0·01) to consume≤1 portion of meat/d compared with men. Females and older respondents (>60 years) were more likely to hold positive attitudes towards animal welfare (P<0·01). Less than a fifth (18·4 %) of the sample agreed that the impact of climate change could be reduced by consuming less meat, dairy products and eggs. Positive attitudes towards animal welfare were associated with consuming less meat and a greater frequency of ‘higher welfare’ meat purchases.

Conclusions

Human health and animal welfare are more common motivations to avoid red and processed meat than environmental sustainability. Policy makers, nutritionists and health professionals need to increase the public’s awareness of the environmental impact of eating red and processed meat. A first step could be to ensure that dietary guidelines integrate the nutritional, animal welfare and environmental components of sustainable diets.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

* Corresponding author: Email paul.wilson@nottingham.ac.uk

References

Hide All
1. Keats, S & Wiggins, S (2014) Future Diets: Implications for Agriculture and Food Prices. London: Overseas Development Institute.
2. Schifferstein, HN & Oude Ophuis, PA (1998) Health-related determinants of organic food consumption in the Netherlands. Food Qual Prefer 9, 119133.
3. Hupkens, CL, Knibbe, RA & Drop, MJ (2000) Social class differences in food consumption: the explanatory value of permissiveness and health and cost considerations. Eur J Public Health 10, 108113.
4. Foster, C, Green, K & Bleda, M (2007) Environmental impacts of food production and consumption: final report to the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?f=2013/GB/GB2013202500025.xml;GB2013202568 (accessed November 2014).
5. Schröder, MJ & McEachern, MG (2004) Consumer value conflicts surrounding ethical food purchase decisions: a focus on animal welfare. Int J Consum Stud 28, 168177.
6. Vermeir, I & Verbeke, W (2006) Sustainable food consumption: exploring the consumer ‘attitude–behavioral intention’ gap. J Agric Environ Ethics 19, 169194.
7. Fiddes, N (1991) Meat: A Natural Symbol. London: Routledge.
8. Department of Health (2014) Meat in your diet. http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/Goodfood/Pages/meat.aspx#reddiet/nutritionessentials/meat/ (accessed December 2014).
9. Department for Health (1991) Dietary Reference Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom. Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 41. London: HMSO.
10. Millward, DJ & Garnett, T (2009) Food and the planet: nutritional dilemmas of greenhouse gas emission reductions through reduced intakes of meat and dairy foods. Proc Nutr Soc 69, 103118.
11. World Health Organization (2007) Protein and Amino Acid Requirements in Human Nutrition. WHO Technical Report Series no. 935. Geneva: WHO/FAO/UNU.
12. Food Standards Agency (2010) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Headline Results from Year 1 of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009). London: FSA.
13. NCHStats (2014) Adults’ daily protein intake much more than recommended. http://nchstats.com/2010/03/03/adults%E2%80%99-daily-protein-intake-much-more-than-recommended/ (accessed November 2014).
14. Halkjaer, J, Olsen, A, Bjerregaard, LJ et al. (2009) Intake of total, animal and plant proteins, and their food sources in 10 countries in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, Suppl. 4, S16S36.
15. Sinha, R, Cross, AJ, Graubard, BI et al. (2009) Meat intake and mortality. Arch Intern Med 169, 562571.
16. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2009) Policy and Action for Cancer Prevention: Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: AICR.
17. Aston, LM, Smith, JN & Powles, JW (2012) Impact of a reduced red and processed meat dietary pattern on disease risks and greenhouse gas emissions in the UK: a modelling study. BMJ Open 2, e001072.
18. Lupton, D (2000) The heart of the meal: food preferences and habits among rural Australian couples. Sociol Health Ill 22, 94109.
19. Povey, R, Wellens, B & Conner, M (2001) Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian and vegan diets: an examination of the role of ambivalence. Appetite 37, 1526.
20. MacMillan (2007) Meat Consumption: Trends and Environmental Implications. London: Food Ethics Council.
21. de Boer, J & Aiking, H (2011) On the merits of plant-based proteins for global food security: marrying macro and micro perspectives. Ecol Econ 70, 12591265.
22. Westhoek, H, Rood, T, van den Berg, et al. (2011) The Protein Puzzle; The Consumption and Production of Meat, Dairy and Fish in the European Union. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
23. Audsley, E, Chatterton, J, Graves, A et al. (2009) Food, Land and Greenhouse Gases: The Effect of Changes in UK Food Consumption on Land Requirements and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. London: The Committee on Climate Change.
24. Friel, S, Dangour, AD, Garnett, T et al. (2009) Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: food and agriculture. Lancet 374, 20162025.
25. Msangi, S & Mark, R (2009) World agriculture in a dynamically-changing environment: IFPRI’s long-term outlook for food and agriculture under additional demands and constraints. Paper presented at the FAO Expert Meeting on How to Feed the World in 2050, FAO Headquarters, Rome, 24–26 June 2009.
26. Langlois, E, Campbell, K, Prieur-Richard, AH et al. (2012) Towards a better integration of global health and biodiversity in the new sustainable development goals beyond Rio+20. EcoHealth 9, 381385.
27. Pelletier, N & Tyedmers, P (2010) Forecasting potential global environmental costs of livestock production 2000–2050. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 1837118374.
28. Rockström, J, Steffen, W, Noone, K et al. (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472475.
29. Frewer, LJ, Kole, A, van der Kroon, S et al. (2005) Consumer attitudes towards the development of animal-friendly husbandry systems. J Agric Environ Ethics 18, 345367.
30. Phan-Huy, SA & Fawaz, RB (2003) Swiss market for meat from animal-friendly production – responses of public and private actors in Switzerland. J Agric Environ Ethics 16, 119136.
31. Bennett, RM, Anderson, J & Blaney, RJ (2002) Moral intensity and willingness to pay concerning farm animal welfare issues and the implications for agricultural policy. J Agric Environ Ethics 15, 187202.
32. Hoogland, CT, de Boer, J & Boersema, JJ (2005) Transparency of the meat chain in the light of food culture and history. Appetite 45, 1523.
33. Marsden, T & Smith, E (2005) Ecological entrepreneurship: sustainable development in local communities through quality food production and local branding. Geoforum 36, 440451.
34. de Boer, J, Schösler, H & Boersema, JJ (2013) Climate change and meat eating: an inconvenient couple? J Environ Psychol 33, 18.
35. Schösler, H, de Boer, J & Boersema, JJ (2012) Can we cut out the meat of the dish? Constructing consumer-oriented pathways towards meat substitution. Appetite 58, 3947.
36. Burton, M, Dorsett, R & Young, T (2000) An investigation of the increasing prevalence of nonpurchase of meat by British households. Appl Econ 32, 19851991.
37. Verbeke, WA & Viaene, J (2000) Ethical challenges for livestock production: meeting consumer concerns about meat safety and animal welfare. J Agric Environ Ethics 12, 141151.
38. Beardsworth, A, Bryman, A, Keil, T et al. (2002) Women, men and food: the significance of gender for nutritional attitudes and choices. Br Food J 104, 470491.
39. Lockie, S, Lyons, K, Lawrence, G et al. (2004) Choosing organics: a path analysis of factors underlying the selection of organic food among Australian consumers. Appetite 43, 135146.
40. Grunert, KG (2006) Future trends and consumer lifestyes with regard to meat consumption. Meat Sci 74, 149160.
41. Bernués, A, Olaizola, A & Corcoran, K (2003) Labelling information demanded by European consumers and relationships with purchasing motives, quality and safety of meat. Meat Sci 65, 10951106.
42. de Boer, J, Boersema, JJ & Aiking, H (2009) Consumers’ motivational associations favoring free-range meat or less meat. Ecol Econ 68, 850860.
43. Office for National Statistics (2014) Regional Profiles: Key Statistics – East Midlands, August 2012. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/regional-trends/region-and-country-profiles/key-statistics-and-profiles---august-2012/key-statistics---east-midlands--august-2012.html (accessed December 2014).
44. Gracia, A & Albisu, LM (1998) The demand for meat and fish in Spain: urban and rural areas. Agric Econ 19, 359366.
45. Woodward, M (1999) Epidemiology: Study Design and Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
46. Pettinger, C, Holdsworth, M & Gerber, M (2006) Meal patterns and cooking practices in Southern France and Central England. Public Health Nutr 9, 10201026.
47. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (2012) Family Food Datasets. London: Defra.
48. Clonan, A (2011) Understanding consumer attitudes to sustainable food. PhD Thesis, Universtity of Nottingham.
49. Sustain (2009) Consumer Guide to Sustainable Food. http://www.sustainweb.org/pdf/SFG_Consumers_1pp.pdf (accessed January 2009).
50. Oppenheim, AN (1992) Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement. London: Pinter Publishers Ltd.
51. Oppenheim, AN (2005) Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Continuum.
52. Bowling, A (2002) Research Methods in Health; Investigating Health and Health Services. Buckingham: Open University Press.
53. Food Standards Agency (2008) The eatwell plate. http://www.eatwell.gov.uk/healthydiet/eatwellplate/ (accessed June 2008).
54. Day, S, Fayers, P & Harvey, D (1998) Double data entry: what value, what price? Control Clin Trials 19, 1524.
55. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (2008) Animal welfare: Consumer interest in animal welfare. http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/ahws/consumer/interest.htm (accessed June 2009).
56. Eastwood, P (1995) Farm animal welfare, Europe and the meat manufacturer. Br Food J 97, 411.
58. Jackson, T (2004) Motivating Sustainable Consumption: A Review of Evidence on Consumer Behaviour and Behavioural Change. A Report to the Sustainable Development Research Network. Guildford: University of Surrey.
59. Delormier, T, Frohlich, KL & Potvin, L (2009) Food and eating as social practice – understanding eating patterns as social phenomena and implications for public health. Sociol Health Ill 31, 215228.
60. Harper, GC & Makatouni, A (2002) Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. Br Food J 104, 287299.
61. Lea, E & Worsley, A (2008) Australian consumers’ food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours. Appetite 50, 207214.
62. Tobler, C, Visschers, VHM & Siegrist, M (2011) Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite 57, 674682.
63. Hoek, AC, Luning, PA, Stafleu, A et al. (2004) Food-related lifestyle and health attitudes of Dutch vegetarians, non-vegetarian consumers of meat substitutes, and meat consumers. Appetite 42, 265272.
64. De Silva, J & Webster, J (editors) (2010) The Meat Crisis: Developing More Sustainable Production and Consumption. London: Earthscan.
65. Pettinger, C, Holdsworth, M & Gerber, M (2004) Psycho-social influences on food choice in Southern France and Central England. Appetite 42, 307316.
66. Taylor, N (2012) Reversing Meat-Eating Culture to Combat Climate Change. Haslemere: World Preservation Foundation.
67. Lorinez, L (1946) Meat management in the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and Argentina. PhD Thesis, University of Ottawa.
68. BBC (2008) On This Day, 4 July 1954: Housewives celebrate end of rationing. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/4/newsid_3818000/3818563.stm (accessed September 2012).
69. Morven, GM & Joyce, W (2004) Producers and consumers of organic meat: a focus on attitudes and motivations. Br Food J 106, 534552.
70. Morven, GM & Claire, S (2005) Consumer perceptions of meat production: enhancing the competitiveness of British agriculture by understanding communication with the consumer. Brt Food J 107, 572593.
71. Stewart, K & Cole, M (2009) The conceptual separation of food and animals in childhood. Food Cult Soc 12, 457476.
72. Saba, A & Di Natale, R (1999) A study on the mediating role of intention in the impact of habit and attitude on meat consumption. Food Qual Prefer 10, 6977.
73. Sparks, P, Guthrie, CA & Shepherd, R (1997) The dimensional structure of the perceived behavioural control construct. J Appl Soc Psychol 27, 418438.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed