Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T08:03:30.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship between nutrition knowledge, education and other determinants of food intake and lifestyle habits among adolescents from urban and rural secondary schools in Tyrol, Western Austria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2020

Sabrina Egg
Affiliation:
Department of Dietetics, Health University of Applied Sciences, Innsbruck6020, Austria Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna1090, Austria
Maria Wakolbinger*
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Centre for Public Health, Vienna1090, Austria Special Institute for Preventive Cardiology And Nutrition (SIPCAN), Elsbethen/Salzburg5061, Austria
Anna Reisser
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna1090, Austria
Manuel Schätzer
Affiliation:
Special Institute for Preventive Cardiology And Nutrition (SIPCAN), Elsbethen/Salzburg5061, Austria
Birgit Wild
Affiliation:
Institute of Sports Medicine, Alpine Medicine and Health Tourism, Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology GmbH (UMIT), Hall in Tirol6060, Austria Institute for Vocational Education, Pedagogical University Tyrol, Innsbruck6010, Austria
Petra Rust
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna1090, Austria
*
*Corresponding author: Email maria.wakolbinger@meduniwien.ac.at
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to investigate the association of the number of hours of nutrition education and teachers’ qualifications with nutrition knowledge and dietary behaviour in students.

Design:

In this representative cross-sectional study, socio-demographic data, anthropometric measurements, socio-economic status (SES), physical fitness, nutrition knowledge and eating habits were assessed. Differences between groups were tested by χ2 and t tests. Multiple linear and logistic regression modelling was used to examine the relationship between demographic characteristics, lifestyle and dietary behaviours, nutrition knowledge, nutrition-trained teachers and number of nutrition lessons.

Setting:

Sixteen secondary schools in urban (n 6) and rural regions (n 10) of Tyrol, Western Austria.

Participants:

Students (n 513) aged 14·2 (sd 0·7) years.

Results:

Higher nutrition knowledge was significantly associated with attending rural school (P = 0·001), having no migration background (P < 0·001), (very) good physical activity behaviour (P = 0·040), non-trained teacher (P = 0·006) but higher number of hours of nutrition education (P = 0·013). Regression models showed that higher nutrition knowledge was independently associated with lower intake of meat and iced tea and higher intake of vegetables and plant-based oils. A higher amount of nutrition education (h/week) was significantly associated with higher intake of dark (wholegrain) bread, lower intake of meat and of energy drinks sweetened with sweeteners.

Conclusions:

Our results suggest that more hours in nutrition education result in higher nutrition knowledge and greater nutrition literacy, which may lead to health-promoting dietary habits. School-based nutrition education can be seen as preventive measure to increase nutritional competences in adolescents independent of their SES.

Type
Research paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Authors 2020

Due to the rise of overweight and obesity, dietary intake, especially in children and adolescents, has been of great concern in previous years. Worldwide, the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents has risen from 4 to 18 % between 1975 and 2016. Consequently, the mean BMI has increased during these years(Reference Abarca-Gómez, Abdeen and Hamid1,2) . According to the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents, the number of overweight and obese children and adolescents aged 3–17 years has increased up to 50 % during the past 30 years(Reference Kurth and Schaffrath Rosario3). Also, in Austria, overweight and obesity have long been on the rise. A representative survey from 2017 has shown that 26 % of 8- to 9-year-old boys and 25 % of the girls are overweight or obese(4) compared with data from 2008 where the prevalence of overweight/obesity was 21 % in boys and 17 % in girls(Reference Elmadfa5). Due to associated comorbidities and the impact of obesity on the healthcare system, the WHO speaks of one of the greatest public health challenges of the 21st century(2). On the other hand, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) report 2018 found reverse tendencies regarding the obesity rate in 7- to 8-year-old children between the survey periods in 2007/2008 and 2015/2017(6). Still, on average, nearly one in eight children in EU countries is obese, and therefore, obesity is remaining one of the main health problems in many countries.

Numerous studies have found that the majority of children do not meet the recommendations of food-based dietary guidelines and energy and nutrient intake, mostly showing a lower fruit and vegetable intake but higher meat and sugar consumption, resulting in high intakes of SFA and salt, and low intakes of PUFA, vitamin D, folate and iodine(Reference Naeeni, Jafari and Fouladgar7,Reference Diethelm, Huybrechts and Moreno8) , especially in Western countries(Reference Banfield, Liu and Davis9Reference Richter, Vohmann and Stahl13). Dietary habits are established early in life and maintain into adulthood(Reference Wang, Bentley and Zhai14Reference Luque, Escribano and Closa-Monasterolo16). This represents an issue, especially with their potential lifelong effects on the development of chronic diseases such as obesity, hypertension, CHD, diabetes mellitus, certain types of cancer and thus, premature mortality and physical morbidity(Reference Baker, Olsen and Sørensen17Reference Juhola, Magnussen and Viikari22). Freedman et al.(Reference Freedman, Mei and Srinivasan23) found that nearly 70 % of obese adolescents have at least one risk factor for CVD. Therefore, childhood and adolescence are a period where good nutritional quality is important for the establishment of health-promoting eating habits that can prevent the development of nutrition-associated health disorders later in life.

Reasons for the rise of obesity in children and adolescents are diverse and include poor food choices, physical inactivity, sedentary lifestyle, peer groups, family structure and socio-economic status (SES) of the parents(Reference Sichert-Hellert, Beghin and Henauw24Reference Prentice-Dunn and Prentice-Dunn29). Furthermore, some literature suggests that nutrition knowledge in children and young adolescents may have an impact on dietary habits(Reference Grosso, Mistretta and Turconi30). In Europe(Reference Sichert-Hellert, Beghin and Henauw24), including Austria(Reference Elmadfa, Blachfelner and Freisling31), poor nutrition knowledge in adolescents was found and may be associated with overweight and obesity. On the other hand, studies have demonstrated that sufficient knowledge is not necessarily associated with health-promoting dietary behaviour due to several other psychological and environmental factors that might play a role(Reference Pérez-Rodrigo and Aranceta32,Reference Contento33) .

Therefore, with the rising number of overweight and obese children, the WHO included nutrition education in their European Core Curriculum(Reference Dixey, Heindl and Loureiro34). The aim was not only to communicate nutritional knowledge but also to develop skills and behaviours related to food preparation, preservation and storage, social and cultural aspects of food and nutrition, as well as improving self-esteem for the development of a positive body image, and thus, improve nutrition literacy. All these aspects are conducive to make healthy food choices and develop lifelong health-promoting eating patterns(Reference Dixey, Heindl and Loureiro34). According to several studies, dietary and physical interventions in combination with structural interventions can result in healthier dietary behaviour among schoolchildren(Reference Story, Neumark-Sztainer and French35Reference Brown and Summerbell39). However, few studies have examined the direct relationship between school nutrition education as a fixed part of the curriculum and dietary behaviour. Those studies suggest that holistic nutrition education, which takes into account the factors mentioned above, can lead to healthier dietary behaviour among schoolchildren(Reference Powers, Struempler and Guarino40,Reference Anderson, Porteous and Foster41) .

Nutrition education in Germany and Austria has found little room in the curricula and timetables so far. It is often included as part of other subjects or implemented in the context of temporary project days or weeks. Although being recommended on the European level, implementation is slow, if not even on hold, in terms of educational policy(Reference Bartsch, Büning-Fesel and Cremer42). In Austria with the exception of secondary schools with certain specialisations, only the so-called ‘New Middle Schools’ (NMS) include ‘Nutrition and Household’ as an independent subject within the curriculum, with each school autonomously deciding how many hours per week should be spent, with one lesson (50 min) per week being the minimum and four lessons the maximum(Reference Ladstätter43).

There is yet no literature regarding the association of teacher training and the number of hours of nutrition education and changes in dietary behaviour in children. However, a review investigating the association between teacher training and behaviour change regarding physical activity found that teachers are capable of making substantial improvements in student outcomes in physical activity. However, the findings of this review suggest that the impact of teacher training on school-based interventions is not only under-reported but also under-studied(Reference Lander, Eather and Morgan44).

Despite a well-elaborated curriculum(Reference Buchner and Schuh45), budget limitations, time constraints and the lack of trained teachers or rather the fair distribution of trained teachers to all schools represent current challenges regarding nutrition education. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the association of the number of hours of nutrition education offered in the curriculum and the qualification of the teachers who teach the subject ‘Nutrition and Household’ with nutrition knowledge and dietary behaviour in 14- and 15-year-old students in Tyrol, Western Austria.

Methods

Participants and procedure

This cross-sectional study was carried out in the eighth grade of sixteen randomly selected NMS in the federal state Tyrol, Western Austria. In order to obtain representative results for Tyrol, a minimum net sample of 500 subjects was required with a significance level of ±5 % (P < 0·05), within a 95 % CI for a population of 5231 students in the school year 2015/2016. Based on the information provided by the School Board, which included ninety-nine NMS in Tyrol, as well as information about the qualification of the teachers, the schools were stratified by teachers’ qualification, of which seven schools were selected with untrained nutrition teachers, and then stratified a second time by the location of the schools (seven urban and seven rural schools). Therefore, fourteen NMS were randomly sampled with the aim to reach approximately 500 schoolchildren from the eighth grade. As participation in the survey was rejected by one NMS because of time reasons, another three NMS were selected and contacted, of which all accepted to participate (Fig. 1). Appointments were organised in agreement with the schools’ principals. Since the survey was anonymous and no identifying data of the students were collected, consent of the parents was waived. The legal guardians of the students, however, had the opportunity to refuse their child’s participation in the survey by signing a declaration of non-consent.

Fig. 1 Flow chart of participant recruitment

The data collection took place in June 2016. The final random sample included sixteen NMS in Tyrol with a total of 628 students. Response rate was 81·7 % resulting in 115 (18·3 %) students who did not participate in the data collection with following reasons: eighty-nine students (77·4 %) did not participate because they or their parents did not want personal data collection, thirteen students (11·3 %) with migration background declined to participate because of lacking language skills and religious reasons and another thirteen students (11·3 %) refused to participate without naming any reasons.

Data collection and material

Data were collected during a pre-organised visit to each school. The students completed the questionnaire in class and in the presence of two trained dietitians and nutritional scientists who guided them through the questionnaire and explained every question in order to avoid misunderstandings and mistakes. The questionnaire was divided into six sections.

The first section comprised four questions about the subject ‘Nutrition and Household’. Two questions referred to the number of lessons per week and school year as well as the qualification of the teachers for the subject and were answered by the schools’ principals beforehand. Additionally, we assessed the number of sports lessons. The students completed the two remaining questions about their personal meaning of practical classes and possible personal benefits from the subject.

The second section covered socio-demographic data and included five questions regarding age, gender and migration background.

The third section included four questions regarding socio-economic data and was based on the validated Family Affluence Scale(Reference Boyce, Torsheim and Currie46). The scale comprises four items including the number of cars and computers within the household, own bedroom and the number of family vacations within the previous year. Family Affluence Scale indicates the SES of the students on a scale from 0 (very low SES) to 8 (very high SES). Following the example of Rey-López et al.(Reference Rey-López, Vicente-Rodríguez and Répásy47), we recoded the scores as low SES (0–2 points), medium SES (3–5 points) and high SES (6–8 points).

The fourth section aimed to measure the level of physical fitness with the validated International Fitness Scale(Reference Sánchez-López, Martínez-Vizcaíno and García-Hermoso48) which included five questions regarding general physical fitness, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, speed/agility and flexibility. Scores were built and classified as very good (21–25 points), good (16–20 points), sufficient (11–15 points), bad (6–10 points) and very bad (1–5 points)(Reference Sánchez-López, Martínez-Vizcaíno and García-Hermoso48).

Furthermore, the children self-reported the usual number of hours they spend per day in front of the TV, computer and mobile phone.

The fifth section comprised questions on nutrition knowledge based on the current Austrian guidelines(49) and on the curriculum for the subject ‘Nutrition and Household’, which defines the minimum goals for this subject. On the one hand, recommended consumption rates of individual foods or food groups were inquired; on the other hand, questions about correct and incorrect food and drink statements were asked. We calculated the percentage of correct answers for the age-specific nutrition knowledge questionnaire, based on previous studies(Reference Grosso, Mistretta and Turconi30,Reference Asakura, Todoriki and Sasaki50) .

The sixth and last section contained a semi-quantitative self-administered FFQ, which is based on the FFQ used for the Austrian Study on Nutritional Status(Reference Elmadfa51) to assess the children’s dietary behaviour. The FFQ comprised twenty-four food items including vegetables, salad, pulses, nuts and seeds, fruits, potatoes, cereals and cereal products, bread (white bread and wholegrain), dairy and dairy products (yogurt, cheese), meat and meat products, fish, eggs, animal fats (like butter), plant oils, fast food, salty snacks and sweets. Drinks were assessed including seventeen items: water, fruit juice, diluted fruit juice, smoothies, fruit nectar, beverages (separated in ice tea, sugar sweetened or light), energy drinks, tea and coffee (with and without sugar). One of the main inaccuracies in dietary intake estimation by using an FFQ is portion size, which is the reason why pictures were included to visualise portion sizes (hand or cup) for each item. The seven frequency response options, ranging from ‘never’ to ‘two times or more per day’, were transformed into daily frequency of consumption.

Anthropometry

Anthropometric measurements, such as body height, body weight and waist circumference, were determined for each student by two trained dietitians and nutritional scientists. Body height was assessed in centimetres with shoes off by means of a measuring tape with measuring accuracy of 0·1 cm. Body weight was measured in kilograms using a mobile calibrated digital scale (Marsden MS-4203®) with an accuracy of 0·1 kg with light clothing and shoes off. BMI was calculated by dividing the weight by square of height (kg/m2). To assess the prevalence of overweight and obesity, the gender- and age-specific limits of the WHO(52,53) were used. Waist circumference was measured in centimetres by means of an ergonomic, extendable measuring tape (Kleiber) with a measuring accuracy of 0·1 cm, which was applied at the midpoint of the lower rib border and the iliac crest, after expiration(Reference Schindler and Ludvik54).

Statistical analyses

Sample characteristics are presented as frequencies or mean and sd as appropriate. Differences between groups were tested by the χ 2 test for categorical variables, while for continuous variables, parametric (Student’s t) tests were used.

The internal consistency of the percentage of correct answers for the age-specific nutrition knowledge questionnaire was evaluated using Cronbach’s α (Reference Cronbach55). The closer α is to one, the higher is the reliability estimate of the instrument. Nutrition knowledge was first described in four levels (quartiles) of the adolescents’ nutrition knowledge groups (low, medium–low, medium–high and high) which were then categorised into two groups: low–medium and medium–high.

Multiple linear and logistic regression modelling was used to examine the relationship between selected demographic characteristics, lifestyle and dietary behaviours and nutrition knowledge, nutrition-trained teachers, nutrition and sports lessons, adjusted for covariates such as urban/rural region, age, gender, migration background and SES. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM® SPSS® Statistics for Windows, version 25 software (IBM Corp.). P values <0·05 were considered statistically significant, and all tests were two-sided.

Results

Characteristics of the study participants

A total of 513 schoolchildren at sixteen secondary schools were included in this cross-sectional study. This is a representative sample consisting of six urban and ten rural schools. Demographic characteristics and lifestyle behaviours are presented in Table 1. The mean age of participants was 14·2 (sd 0·7) years (range 13–18 years). Gender was approximately equal in representation, with boys accounting for slightly more of the participants (51 %). Boys were significantly more likely to be overweight or obese (P = 0·042) with higher waist circumference (P < 0·001) but a higher percentage of self-reported (very) good physical activity behaviour (P < 0·001) and were older (P = 0·050).

Table 1 Sample characteristics: adolescents (n 513) in secondary schools in Tyrol, Western Austria

* Independent samples t tests or χ 2 test, as appropriate. Significant findings are bold.

Nutrition knowledge

The mean percentage of correct answers of the nutrition knowledge questionnaire was 49·4 % (13·7), 45·5 % (14·1) among adolescents in urban schools, 50·5 % (13·5) among those in rural schools, 45·9 % (14·5) among those with migration background and 52·1 % (12·5) among those without migration background. Internal consistency measured by the Cronbach’s α for the nutrition knowledge questionnaire was 0·490 (in total), 0·505 (urban), 0·473 (rural), 0·537 (migration background) and 0·395 (no migration background). Findings regarding the association between demographic characteristics, lifestyle and dietary behaviours and nutrition knowledge are reported in Table 2. Means and sd of nutrition knowledge (in percentage of correct answers) are shown to highlight demographic and lifestyle differences. Higher nutrition knowledge scores were significantly associated with being in a rural region or school, respectively (P = 0·001), having no migration background (P < 0·001), having (very) good physical activity behaviour (P = 0·040), having a non-trained teacher (P = 0·006) but having a higher amount of nutrition education (h/week; P = 0·013).

Table 2 Distribution of nutrition knowledge in percentage of correct answers according to demographic characteristics and lifestyle behaviours of the study: adolescents (n 513) aged 13–14 years in urban and rural schools of Tyrol, Western Austria

* Independent samples t tests or χ 2 test, as appropriate. Significant findings are bold.

The relationship between the adolescent’s nutrition knowledge and their demographic characteristics, lifestyle and dietary behaviours is shown in Table 3. A higher knowledge level was significantly associated with higher body weight, higher intake of vegetables and plant-based oils (model 2, adjusted for urban/rural region, age, gender, migration background and SES). Media consumption, the intake of meat, salty snacks, fat-free milk, iced tea and energy drinks (sweetened with sweeteners) were negatively associated with nutrition knowledge (model 2, adjusted for urban/rural region, age, gender, migration background and SES).

Table 3 Relationship between selected demographic characteristics, lifestyle and dietary behaviours (frequency/d) and nutrition knowledge in percentage of correct answers, nutrition and sports lessons (h/week) by linear regression analysis: adolescents (n 513) aged 13–14 years in urban and rural schools of Tyrol, Western Austria

SES, socio-economic status. Significant findings are bold.

* Linear regression model was used to examine the relationship between demographic characteristics, lifestyle and dietary behaviours (frequency/d) and nutrition knowledge in percentage of correct answers, nutrition and sports lessons (h/week). Model 1: Univariate linear regression adjusted for urban/rural region, age, gender, migration background and SES.

Model 2: Multivariate linear regression with backward selection adjusted for urban/rural region, age, gender, migration background and SES.

Multiple logistic regression modelling was used to assess the association between nutrition knowledge and demographic characteristics, lifestyle and dietary behaviours. Regression analysis revealed that nutrition knowledge was independently associated with lower intake of meat and iced tea, and a higher intake of vegetables and plant-based oils (Table 4, adjusted for urban/rural region, age, gender, migration background and SES).

Table 4 Relationship between selected demographic characteristics, lifestyle and dietary behaviours (frequency/d) and nutrition knowledge (cut-off ≥55 %, medium/high), nutrition-trained teacher, and nutrition lessons (≥2·5 h/week) by logistic regression analysis: adolescents (n 513) aged 13–14 years in urban and rural schools of Tyrol, Western Austria, 2016

SES, socio-economic status. Significant findings are bold.

* Logistic regression model was used to examine the relationship between demographic characteristics, lifestyle and dietary behaviours (frequency/d) and nutrition knowledge (medium–high v. low–medium), nutrition-trained teacher (yes v. no), and nutrition lessons (≥2·5 v. <2·5 h/week). Model 1: Univariate logistic regression adjusted for urban/rural region, age, gender, migration background and SES.

Model 2: Multivariate logistic regression with backward selection adjusted for urban/rural region, age, gender, migration background and SES.

Nutrition education

The mean number of hours in nutrition education was 2·3 (0·7) h/week, 1·6 (0·4) h among adolescents in urban schools and 2·6 (0·7) h among those in rural schools (P < 0·001). A higher amount of nutrition education was significantly associated with higher intake of dark (wholegrain) bread, a lower intake of meat and of energy drinks sweetened with sweeteners (Table 3; model 2, adjusted for urban/rural region, age, gender, migration background and SES).

Logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds of consuming dark (wholegrain) bread (OR 1·7) increased while the odds of consuming fat-free milk (OR 0·4) decreased as the number of nutrition lessons increased (≥2·5 h/week; Table 4; model 2, adjusted for urban/rural region, age, gender, migration background and SES).

In terms of the nutrition training of the adolescent’s teachers, we found no significant associations with items regarding dietary behaviour by considering the cohort as a whole. Given the regional differences found, we divided the cohort into two subgroups: (i) adolescents in urban schools and (ii) those in rural schools. Applying such a division in the aforementioned logistic regression analysis revealed following results: In those adolescents with a trained teacher and living in an urban region, the odds of consuming vegetables (OR 3·78, 95 % CI 1·06, 13·46; P = 0·040) increased, while the odds of a higher waist circumference decreased (OR 0·87, 95 % CI 0·76, 0·99; P = 0·043, adjusted for age, gender, migration background and SES). We found no significant impact on dietary behaviour in adolescents living in a rural region.

Discussion

In the current study, with a cross-sectional design, we aimed to assess associations between nutritional knowledge, food intake and the amount of lessons in nutrition education as well as the presence of trained teachers for the subject ‘Nutrition and Household’ among children and young adolescents in secondary schools (NMS) in Tyrol with the consideration of demographic and socio-economic data. Our data show associations of higher nutrition knowledge with being in a rural school, having no migration background, having (very) good physical activity behaviour (self-reported), having a non-trained teacher but having a higher amount of nutrition education hours per week. Our results also show a tendency of a higher SES being associated with higher nutrition knowledge. To date and to our knowledge, the current study is the first one assessing these associations in a representative sample of adolescents living in rural and urban regions of Tyrol, Western Austria.

Studies found that children with a migration background are at higher risk for overweight(Reference Weber, Spörkel and Mertens56,Reference Winkler and Sigmaringen57) , one of them, being a German study, demonstrated a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity among children with a migration background(Reference Kurth and Schaffrath Rosario3). According to the authors, this might be due to the higher consumption of foods rich in sugar and fat(Reference Winkler and Sigmaringen57). However, in an experimental study, Weber et al.(Reference Weber, Eitner and Dauben58) could improve the children’s short-term nutrition knowledge and skills by providing practical nutrition lessons in primary schools with a high proportion of children with a migration background. Another similar study by Kaufmann-Shriqui et al.(Reference Kaufman-Shriqui, Fraser and Friger59) in school children with low SES (which often is associated with migration background and consuming poor diets(Reference Zarnowiecki, Dollman and Parletta60)) reached promising results with a school-based intervention not only on nutrition knowledge but also on dietary habits. The intervention included nutrition classes for children, mothers and teachers within a duration of 6 months. Eating habits and nutrition knowledge, as well as the quality of their packed lunches, improved significantly. This intervention highlights the impact of involving mothers and teachers in health promotion activities and that nutritional education programmes as part of the school curriculum can contribute to maintaining a healthy body weight of schoolchildren.

When adjusting a healthy lifestyle, good nutrition and regular physical activity are essential. Several studies exist where both aspects are considered as part of an intervention programme(Reference Weber, Spörkel and Mertens56,Reference Ha, Lee and Kim61) . Despite the knowledge about adequate nutrition and physical activity, the challenge is its application. Knowledge about nutrition and physical activity often improves but not the behaviour(Reference Villiers, Steyn and Draper62). Still, our study somewhat shows an association between higher nutrition knowledge and higher physical activity, although these results need to be carefully looked at since variables about physical activity rely on self-reported responses. However, these heterogenic results imply that numerous factors play a crucial role in the development of a healthy lifestyle, one of them is parental involvement in school interventions since they act as role models and schoolchildren are mostly dependent on the food and activity choices their parents make at home(Reference Grosso, Mistretta and Turconi30,Reference Sharma63,Reference Hagarty, Schmidt and Bernaix64) .

In addition, we found associations between higher nutrition knowledge and higher body weight but healthier food choices. However, the associations with BMI or waist circumference were not significant. Media consumption, the intake of meat, salty snacks, fat-free milk, iced tea and energy drinks (sweetened with sweeteners) were negatively associated with nutrition knowledge. In addition, we observed that a higher knowledge level was associated with higher vegetable and oil consumption. Results in comparable studies show a positive impact of knowledge on food consumption and nutritional behaviour in children and adolescents: Intake of foods considered to be healthy, such as vegetables, fruits and starchy foods, was often higher when nutrition knowledge was higher, while consumption of unhealthy foods such as sweets, snacks, fried foods and sugary drinks was negatively associated with nutrition knowledge(Reference Naeeni, Jafari and Fouladgar7,Reference Grosso, Mistretta and Turconi30) . Similar to our study, studies have also shown a significant difference between boys and girls, demonstrating boys having lower nutrition knowledge and lower consumption of vegetables and fruits but a higher consumption of meats, fats and soft drinks compared with girls(Reference Naeeni, Jafari and Fouladgar7,Reference Ridder, Koning and Visscher65,Reference Milosavljević, Mandić and Banjari66) . On the other hand, there are also several studies with no significant associations between nutrition knowledge and dietary behaviour, which confirms again that dietary behaviour and lifestyle are a multifactorial result of various influences of psychological, behavioural, genetic, environmental, socio-economic and socio-demographic origin(Reference Pérez-Rodrigo and Aranceta32,Reference Contento33) .

Although hypothesised contrarywise, we found that children having a trained teacher demonstrated lower nutrition knowledge compared with those with non-trained teachers. However, a higher amount of nutrition lessons per week was associated with higher nutrition knowledge. Consequently, the number of nutrition lessons per week in the curriculum seems to have a greater impact on nutrition knowledge than the qualification of teachers in nutrition. Moreover, our findings demonstrate a significant difference between urban and rural schools, with more hours of nutrition education in rural regions, which is probably the reason why nutrition knowledge is higher in rural schools than in urban ones. One study found opposite results, showing that in rural schools significantly less nutrition lessons were taught than in suburban schools(Reference Watts, Piñero and Alter67). But studies regarding nutrition knowledge of children and adolescents and the number of lessons in urban and/or rural areas are scarce. It is believed that differences between urban and rural areas can vary within the respective countries, and further studies are necessary in this research field.

Furthermore, our findings illustrate a positive association between nutrition education hours per week and healthier food choices, for example, a higher intake of whole grains and a lower intake of meat and energy drinks. Current studies investigating the association of nutrition education as part of the curriculum and dietary behaviour are rare but there are numerous studies showing that nutrition interventions at school, targeting the improvement of the consumption of healthy foodstuffs such as vegetables and fruits in children and adolescents, accompanied by adjustments of the school food environment, can be successful(Reference Ridder, Koning and Visscher65,Reference Prelip, Kinsler and Le Thai68Reference Kristjansdottir, Thorsdottir and de Bourdeaudhuij74) . Nonetheless, a review found that the lack of fidelity in peer-led interventions, lack of behaviour support for environmental interventions and too-short duration (under 5 months) were factors that contributed to the failing of some of the reviewed interventions(Reference Murimi, Kanyi and Mupfudze75).

Limitations

Some limitations of the current study need to be mentioned. First, the study design was cross-sectional. Consequently, conclusions cannot be attributed to plausible causes, but to valuable assumptions that could be used for further studies. As with any self-reported data, misreporting bias need to be taken into account. Also, it is possible that there is a tendency of respondents to answer questions in a way that will be viewed positively by others, which is called social acceptability bias. However, because of practical and budgetary reasons, this option was necessary.

Additionally, we could not provide individual assistance to the children when completing the FFQ, and therefore, we cannot exclude errors made by the children when indicating portion sizes and frequencies for each item. Thus, we refrained from drawing conclusions on the exact daily intake in grams since we think that specifications in this direction would be too vague. Therefore, for further analysis, we rather focused on consumption frequency per day and thus, more on nutrition quality than quantity. Despite their strengths of simply assessing usual dietary intake, saving time, being cost-effective and suitable for epidemiological studies, FFQ have several limitations that have to be considered. They are specific to study groups and research aims, use a closed-ended questionnaire, have low accuracy (recall bias) and require accurate evaluation(Reference Shim, Oh and Kim76). Some studies describe an overestimation of dietary intake using an FFQ due to a large number of food items asked, offering a wider range of options, for one thing. On the other hand, increasing the frequency of food items may lead to smaller intake amounts(Reference Bel-Serrat, Mouratidou and Pala77).

Data collection took place at the end of the school year within 4 weeks. Therefore, seasonal variations in dietary intake could not be considered. Additionally, even though the sample was representative of a typical rural and urban region in Tyrol, our sample consisted of children in a single Austrian area. Therefore, it does not permit the generalisation of the results. Lastly, the results of the Cronbach’s α test are low and thus considered to be insufficient. In terms of validity and reliability, the questionnaires to assess nutritional knowledge and other variables in this study need to be adjusted and tested accordingly for future investigations.

Conclusions

Mostly, studies focus on short-term nutritional interventions, but to our knowledge not on the impact of nutrition education as part of the curriculum. Our results and those of the current literature suggest that more hours in nutrition education are somehow linked with better nutrition knowledge. However, nutrition education should not only aim to improve nutrition knowledge but also overall nutrition literacy to improve dietary and lifestyle behaviours in children and adolescents. Current data regarding the association of nutrition knowledge and dietary behaviour are very heterogenic but some clearly show a positive association between knowledge and intake of different food groups such as higher consumption of fruits and vegetables(Reference Asakura, Todoriki and Sasaki50,Reference Kristjansdottir, Thorsdottir and de Bourdeaudhuij74,Reference Pirouznia78) . Children mention that education of themselves and their parents could improve awareness of the positive and negative health effects of diverse foods(Reference Battram, Piché and Beynon79). Nevertheless, there are other factors influencing food choices such as socio-demographic factors (e.g. age, gender, lower household income), peer-groups, advertising and availability. School as the primary environment of children plays a central role in education beside home and media and may compensate for social disadvantages.

Even though, with our study design, we could not consider all factors contributing to dietary behaviour, we observed the importance of regular and appropriate health education at school.

With regard to the increasing prevalence of nutrition-related diseases in children and adolescents, more hours for school-based nutrition education, nutrition-related projects and events can be seen as preventive measures to increase nutritional competences and thus, reduce disease incidence later in life. Also, schools are confronted with tremendous challenges in dealing with health and nutrition education since the role of the parents in this context has shifted due to changing rhythms of life, family structures and working conditions. Therefore, a closer look by politicians, the responsible state school councillors, municipalities and school leaders towards nutrition as an important factor in school-based health promotion is required.

Further studies are necessary to assess the quality of nutrition education to identify current problems and challenges, and in further consequence, contemporary requirements for high-quality nutrition education in Austria and other countries in order to secure the future of nutrition education in secondary schools and in other school types.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements: None. Financial support: The current research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Conflict of interest: There are no conflicts of interest. Authorship: M.S. and M.W. designed the research. M.W. and A.R. analysed the data and performed statistical analyses. M.W. supervised the statistical analysis. S.E. and M.W. drafted the manuscript. M.S., B.W. and P.R. provided critical input on all versions of the manuscript. P.R. had prime responsibility for the final manuscript content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: The current study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the ethics committee at the Medical University of Vienna (EC-No. 1168/2016). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

References

Abarca-Gómez, L, Abdeen, ZA, Hamid, ZA et al. (2017) Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 390, 26272642.10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (2018) Obesity and overweight. http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed September 2018).Google Scholar
Kurth, B-M & Schaffrath Rosario, A (2007) The prevalence of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents in Germany. Results of the nationwide child and youth health survey (KiGGS). Bundesgesundheitsbla 50, 736743.10.1007/s00103-007-0235-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Ministry of Health and Women (2017) Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI): Report Austria 2017. Vienna.Google Scholar
Elmadfa, I (editor) (2012) Austrian Nutrition Report 2012. Vienna: Federal Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2018) Health at a Glance: Europe 2018. Paris: State of Health in the EU Cycle. Health at a glance Europe 2018.Google Scholar
Naeeni, MM, Jafari, S, Fouladgar, M et al. (2014) Nutritional knowledge, practice, and dietary habits among school children and adolescents. Int J Prev Med 5, Suppl. 2, S171S178.10.4103/2008-7802.157687CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diethelm, K, Huybrechts, I, Moreno, L et al. (2014) Nutrient intake of European adolescents: results of the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) Study. Public Health Nutr 17, 486497.10.1017/S1368980013000463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banfield, EC, Liu, Y, Davis, JS et al. (2016) Poor adherence to US dietary guidelines for children and adolescents in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Population. J Acad Nutr Diet 116, 2127.10.1016/j.jand.2015.08.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doidge, JC & Segal, L (2012) Most Australians do not meet recommendations for dairy consumption: findings of a new technique to analyse nutrition surveys. Aust N Z J Public Health 36, 236240.Google Scholar
Serra-Majem, L, Ribas-Barba, L, Salvador, G et al. (2007) Compliance with dietary guidelines in the Catalan population: basis for a nutrition policy at the regional level (the PAAS strategy). Public Health Nutr 10, 14061414.10.1017/S1368980007001012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensink, GBM, Kleiser, C & Richter, A (2007) Food consumption by children and young people in Germany. Results of the Health Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS). Bundesgesundheitsbla 50, 609623.10.1007/s00103-007-0222-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, A, Vohmann, C, Stahl, A et al. (2008) The current food consumption of children and young people in Germany. Ernaehrungs Umschau 55, 2836.Google Scholar
Wang, Y, Bentley, ME, Zhai, F et al. (2002) Tracking of dietary intake patterns of Chinese from childhood to adolescence over a six-year follow-up period. J Nutr 132, 430438.10.1093/jn/132.3.430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkilä, V, Räsänen, L, Raitakari, OT et al. (2005) Consistent dietary patterns identified from childhood to adulthood: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. BJN 93, 923.10.1079/BJN20051418CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luque, V, Escribano, J, Closa-Monasterolo, R et al. (2018) Unhealthy dietary patterns established in infancy track to mid-childhood: the EU childhood obesity project. J Nutr 148, 752759.10.1093/jn/nxy025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, JL, Olsen, LW & Sørensen, TIA (2007) Childhood body-mass index and the risk of coronary heart disease in adulthood. N Engl J Med 357, 23292337.10.1056/NEJMoa072515CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camhi, SM, Katzmarzyk, PT, Broyles, S et al. (2010) Predicting adult body mass index-specific metabolic risk from childhood. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 8, 165172.Google ScholarPubMed
Reilly, JJ & Kelly, J (2011) Long-term impact of overweight and obesity in childhood and adolescence on morbidity and premature mortality in adulthood: systematic review. Int J Obes 35, 891898.Google ScholarPubMed
Funtikova, AN, Navarro, E, Bawaked, RA et al. (2015) Impact of diet on cardiometabolic health in children and adolescents. Nutr J 14, 118.10.1186/s12937-015-0107-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocha, NP, Milagres, LC, Longo, GZ et al. (2017) Association between dietary pattern and cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Pediatr 93, 214222.10.1016/j.jped.2017.01.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juhola, J, Magnussen, CG, Viikari, JSA et al. (2011) Tracking of serum lipid levels, blood pressure, and body mass index from childhood to adulthood: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. J Pediatr 159, 584590.Google ScholarPubMed
Freedman, DS, Mei, Z, Srinivasan, SR et al. (2007) Cardiovascular risk factors and excess adiposity among overweight children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Pediatr 150, 1217.e2.10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.08.042CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sichert-Hellert, W, Beghin, L, Henauw, S de et al. (2011) Nutritional knowledge in European adolescents: results from the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) study. Public Health Nutr 14, 20832091.10.1017/S1368980011001352CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elmesmari, R, Martin, A, Reilly, JJ et al. (2018) Comparison of accelerometer measured levels of physical activity and sedentary time between obese and non-obese children and adolescents: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 18, 106.10.1186/s12887-018-1031-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yelick, A (2017) The effects of family structure on consumption and exercise patterns for adolescent youth. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 34, 381395.10.1007/s10560-016-0468-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagherniya, M, Darani, FM, Keshavarz, SA et al. (2018) The impact of adolescent friendships on unhealthy eating behaviors of overweight and obese adolescents: a Qualitative Study. Int J Pediatr 6, 83858398.Google Scholar
Summerbell, CD, Douthwaite, W, Whittaker, V et al. (2009) The association between diet and physical activity and subsequent excess weight gain and obesity assessed at 5 years of age or older: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Int J Obes 33, Suppl. 3, S1S92.Google ScholarPubMed
Prentice-Dunn, H & Prentice-Dunn, S (2012) Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and childhood obesity: a review of cross-sectional studies. Psychol Health Med 17, 255273.Google ScholarPubMed
Grosso, G, Mistretta, A, Turconi, G et al. (2013) Nutrition knowledge and other determinants of food intake and lifestyle habits in children and young adolescents living in a rural area of Sicily, South Italy. Public Health Nutr 16, 18271836.Google Scholar
Elmadfa, I, Blachfelner, J, Freisling, H et al. (2005) 2. Viennese Nutrition Report. Vienna: Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Pérez-Rodrigo, C & Aranceta, J (2003) Nutrition education in schools: Experiences and challenges. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, Suppl. 1, S82S85.10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Contento, IR (2008) Nutrition education: linking research, theory, and practice. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 17, Suppl. 1, 176179.Google Scholar
Dixey, R, Heindl, I, Loureiro, I et al. (2000) Healthy Eating für Young People in Europe: A School-Based Nutrition Education Guide. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
Story, M, Neumark-Sztainer, D & French, S (2002) Individual and environmental influences on adolescent eating behaviors. J Am Diet Assoc 102, S40S51.10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90421-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silveira, JAC, Taddei, J, Gueraa, PH et al. (2011) Effectiveness of school-based nutrition education interventions to prevent and reduce excessive weight gain in children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Pediatr 87, 382392.10.2223/JPED.2123CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Story, M, Lytle, LA, Birnbaum, AS et al. (2002) Peer-led, school-based nutrition education for young adolescents: feasibility and process evaluation of the TEENS study. J Sch Health 72, 121127.10.1111/j.1746-1561.2002.tb06529.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerra, PH, da Silveira, JAC, Salvador, EP (2016) Physical activity and nutrition education at the school environment aimed at preventing childhood obesity: evidence from systematic reviews. J Pediatr 92, 1523.10.1016/j.jped.2015.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T & Summerbell, C (2009) Systematic review of school-based interventions that focus on changing dietary intake and physical activity levels to prevent childhood obesity: an update to the obesity guidance produced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Obes Rev 10, 110141.10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00515.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powers, AR, Struempler, BJ, Guarino, A et al. (2005) Effects of a nutrition education program on the dietary behavior and nutrition knowledge of second-grade and third-grade students. J Sch Health 75, 129133.10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb06657.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, AS, Porteous, LEG, Foster, E et al. (2005) The impact of a school-based nutrition education intervention on dietary intake and cognitive and attitudinal variables relating to fruits and vegetables. Public Health Nutr 8, 650656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartsch, S, Büning-Fesel, M, Cremer, M et al. (2013) Nutrition education – location and perspectives. Ernaehrungs Umschau 2, M84M95.Google Scholar
Ladstätter, A (2013) Handouts on Nutrition and Household in the New Secondary School. Innsbruck: Regional School Board for Tyrol. https://www.lsr-t.gv.at/sites/lsr.tsn.at/files/upload_hauswirtschaft/Handreichung%20EH%20NMS%202013.pdf (accessed May 2020).Google Scholar
Lander, N, Eather, N, Morgan, PJ et al. (2017) Characteristics of teacher training in school-based physical education interventions to improve fundamental movement skills and/or physical activity: a systematic review. Sports Medi 47, 135161.10.1007/s40279-016-0561-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchner, U & Schuh, M (2009) Reference Framework for Nutrition and Consumer Education in Austria. Salzburg: Thematic Network on Nutrition TNE e.V.Google Scholar
Boyce, W, Torsheim, T, Currie, C et al. (2006) The family affluence scale as a measure of national wealth: validation of an adolescent self-report measure. Soc Indic Res 78, 473487.10.1007/s11205-005-1607-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey-López, JP, Vicente-Rodríguez, G, Répásy, J et al. (2011) Food and drink intake during television viewing in adolescents: the Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence (HELENA) study. Public Health Nutr 14, 15631569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sánchez-López, M, Martínez-Vizcaíno, V, García-Hermoso, A et al. (2015) Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the International Fitness Scale (IFIS) in Spanish children aged 9–12 years. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25, 543551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Federal Ministry of Health and Women (2010) The Austrian food pyramid. https://broschuerenservice.sozialministerium.at/Home/Download?publicationId=617 (accessed May 2020).Google Scholar
Asakura, K, Todoriki, H & Sasaki, S (2017) Relationship between nutrition knowledge and dietary intake among primary school children in Japan: combined effect of children’s and their guardians’ knowledge. J Epidemiol 27, 483491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elmadfa, I (2008) Austrian Nutrition Report 2008. Vienna: Federal Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2007) BMI-for-age BOYS: 5 to 19 years (z-scores). https://www.who.int/growthref/bmifa_boys_5_19years_z.pdf?ua=1 (accessed November 2018).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2007) BMI-for-age GIRLS: 5 to 19 years (z-scores). https://www.who.int/growthref/bmifa_girls_5_19years_z.pdf?ua=1 (accessed November 2018).Google Scholar
Schindler, K & Ludvik, B (2004) Assessment of body composition – methods and practical aspects. Wien Med Wochenschr 154, 305312.10.1007/s10354-004-0079-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronbach, LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297334.10.1007/BF02310555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, KS, Spörkel, O, Mertens, M et al. (2017) Positive effects of promoting physical activity and balanced diets in a primary school setting with a high proportion of migrant school children. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 125, 554562.Google Scholar
Winkler, G & Sigmaringen, J (2008) Overweight and obesity in children with migration background: results of the school enrolment surveys in Stuttgart. Ernaehrungs Umschau 10, 592598.Google Scholar
Weber, KS, Eitner, J, Dauben, L et al. (2020) Positive effects of practical nutrition lessons in a primary school setting with a high proportion of migrant school children. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 128, 111118.Google Scholar
Kaufman-Shriqui, V, Fraser, D, Friger, M et al. (2016) Effect of a school-based intervention on nutritional knowledge and habits of low-socioeconomic school children in Israel: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Nutrients 8, 234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zarnowiecki, DM, Dollman, J & Parletta, N (2014) Associations between predictors of children’s dietary intake and socioeconomic position: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev 15, 375391.10.1111/obr.12139CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ha, SA, Lee, SY, Kim, KA et al. (2016) Eating habits, physical activity, nutrition knowledge, and self-efficacy by obesity status in upper-grade elementary school students. Nutr Res Pract 10, 597605.Google ScholarPubMed
Villiers, A de, Steyn, NP, Draper, CE et al. (2016) Primary school children’s nutrition knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior, after a three-year healthy lifestyle intervention (HealthKick). Ethn Dis 26, 171180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, M (2007) International school-based interventions for preventing obesity in children. Obes Rev 8, 155167.10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00268.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagarty, MA, Schmidt, C, Bernaix, L et al. (2004) Adolescent obesity: current trends in identification and management. J Amer Acad Nurse Practitioners 16, 481489.10.1111/j.1745-7599.2004.tb00427.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridder, MAM, Koning, M, Visscher, TLS et al. (2018) Energy balance-related behavior and anthropometric measures among adolescents across three educational levels: a cross-sectional study in Dutch schools. Health Educ Behav 45, 349358.10.1177/1090198117715666CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milosavljević, D, Mandić, ML & Banjari, I (2015) Nutritional knowledge and dietary habits survey in high school population. Coll Antropol 39, 101107.Google ScholarPubMed
Watts, SO, Piñero, DJ, Alter, MM et al. (2012) An assessment of nutrition education in selected counties in New York State elementary schools (kindergarten through fifth grade). J Nutr Educ Behav 44, 474480.Google Scholar
Prelip, M, Kinsler, J, Le Thai, C et al. (2012) Evaluation of a school-based multicomponent nutrition education program to improve young children’s fruit and vegetable consumption. J Nutr Educ Behav 44, 310318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blom-Hoffman, J, Kelleher, C, Power, TJ et al. (2004) Promoting healthy food consumption among young children: evaluation of a multi-component nutrition education program. J Sch Psychol 42, 4560.10.1016/j.jsp.2003.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, AM, Andrade, FC de & Finkelstein, B (2018) Assessing the effectiveness of nutrition interventions implemented among US college students to promote healthy behaviors: a systematic review. Nutr Health 24, 171181.Google ScholarPubMed
Plotnikoff, RC, Costigan, SA, Williams, RL et al. (2015) Effectiveness of interventions targeting physical activity, nutrition and healthy weight for university and college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12, 45.10.1186/s12966-015-0203-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno-Maldonado, C, Ramos, P, Moreno, C. et al. (2018) How family socioeconomic status, peer behaviors, and school-based intervention on healthy habits influence adolescent eating behaviors. Sch Psychol Int 39, 92118.Google Scholar
Lua, PL & Wan Putri Elena, WD (2012) The impact of nutrition education interventions on the dietary habits of college students in developed nations: a brief review. Malays J Med Sci 19, 414.Google ScholarPubMed
Kristjansdottir, AG, Thorsdottir, I, de Bourdeaudhuij, I et al. (2006) Determinants of fruit and vegetable intake among 11-year-old schoolchildren in a country of traditionally low fruit and vegetable consumption. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 3, 41.10.1186/1479-5868-3-41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murimi, MW, Kanyi, M, Mupfudze, T et al. (2017) Factors influencing efficacy of nutrition education interventions: a systematic review. J Nutr Educ Behav 49, 142165.e1.Google ScholarPubMed
Shim, J-S, Oh, K & Kim, HC (2014) Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol Health 36, e2014009.10.4178/epih/e2014009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bel-Serrat, S, Mouratidou, T, Pala, V et al. (2014) Relative validity of the children’s eating habits questionnaire-food frequency section among young European children: the IDEFICS Study. Public Health Nutr 17, 266276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pirouznia, M (2009) The association between nutrition knowledge and eating behavior in male and female adolescents in the US. Int J Food Sci Nutr 52, 127132.10.1080/09637480020027000-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battram, DS, Piché, L, Beynon, C et al. (2016) Sugar-sweetened beverages: children’s perceptions, factors of influence, and suggestions for reducing intake. J Nutr Educ Behav 48, 2734.e1.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Flow chart of participant recruitment

Figure 1

Table 1 Sample characteristics: adolescents (n 513) in secondary schools in Tyrol, Western Austria

Figure 2

Table 2 Distribution of nutrition knowledge in percentage of correct answers according to demographic characteristics and lifestyle behaviours of the study: adolescents (n 513) aged 13–14 years in urban and rural schools of Tyrol, Western Austria

Figure 3

Table 3 Relationship between selected demographic characteristics, lifestyle and dietary behaviours (frequency/d) and nutrition knowledge in percentage of correct answers, nutrition and sports lessons (h/week) by linear regression analysis: adolescents (n 513) aged 13–14 years in urban and rural schools of Tyrol, Western Austria

Figure 4

Table 4 Relationship between selected demographic characteristics, lifestyle and dietary behaviours (frequency/d) and nutrition knowledge (cut-off ≥55 %, medium/high), nutrition-trained teacher, and nutrition lessons (≥2·5 h/week) by logistic regression analysis: adolescents (n 513) aged 13–14 years in urban and rural schools of Tyrol, Western Austria, 2016